A Follow-up Study of Rotigotine Patch in Adolescent Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome

October 5, 2023 updated by: UCB Biopharma SRL

A Remote, Open-Label, Long-Term, Follow-up Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rotigotine Transdermal System as Monotherapy in Adolescents With Restless Legs Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety, tolerability and the long-term efficacy of rotigotine treatment in adolescents with idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Culver City, California, United States, 90230
        • Rl0007 101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject weighs >=40 kg
  • Subject has completed at least one dose step in SP1006, a previous study of rotigotine in adolescents with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), without meeting withdrawal criteria
  • Female subjects must be surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, or barrier and spermicide). Abstinence is an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 4 weeks after their final dose of study drug
  • Subject is expected to benefit from participation, in the opinion of the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is experiencing an ongoing serious Adverse Event (SAE) that is assessed to be related to rotigotine by the investigator or Sponsor
  • Subject has active suicidal ideation as indicated by a positive response ("Yes") to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the "Since Last Visit" version of the electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS) at the final evaluation visit of the previous rotigotine study (ie, Visit 10 of SP1006)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rotigotine
Subjects will be initiated on 1 mg/24 h rotigotine and up-titrated to a maximum of 3 mg/24 h rotigotine, with the aim of achieving the individually optimized dosage. Dose adjustment of rotigotine is allowed at any time during the following Maintenance Period up to a maximum dose of 3 mg/24 h. At the end of the Maintenance Period, subjects will be down-titrated.
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 1 mg/24 h (5 cm^2 patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 2 mg/24 h (10 cm^2 patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 3 mg/24 h (15 cm^2 patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline until the Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to 14 Months)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as events that started during the Treatment Period or within 30 days following the end of the Treatment Period (ie, on or after the date of first patch application and within 30 days following the date of last patch removal + 1 day), or those events where the intensity worsened within this time frame.
From Baseline until the Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to 14 Months)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal of Study Medication
Time Frame: From Baseline until the Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to 14 Months)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as events that started during the Treatment Period or within 30 days following the end of the Treatment Period (ie, on or after the date of first patch application and within 30 days following the date of last patch removal + 1 day), or those events where the intensity worsened within this time frame.
From Baseline until the Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to 14 Months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in International Restless Legs Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score at Visit 9
Time Frame: Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)
The IRLS consisted of 10 questions, each scored using a 5-point scale ranging from 0=not present to 4=very severe. The IRLS sum score was calculated by summing up the single scores of all applicable questions, i.e., the total sum score ranged from 0 (no RLS symptoms present) to 40 (maximum severity in all symptoms). A score between 31 and 40, indicates very severe RLS. A score between 21 and 30 indicates severe RLS. A score between 11 and 20 indicates moderate RLS. A score between 1 and 10 indicates mild RLS and a score of 0 means no RLS. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 at Visit 9
Time Frame: Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)
The Clinical Global Impressions Item 1 (Severity of Illness) score ranges from 0 to 7 as follows: 0=not assessed, 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill. The CGI Item 1 was completed during an interview between the participant and the investigator or designee. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)
Changes From Baseline in Restless Legs-6 Rating Scales (RLS-6) at Visit 9
Time Frame: Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)
The RLS-6 Rating Scales was designed to assess the severity of RLS and consisted of 6 subscales. The subscales assessed severity of symptoms at the following times of the day/evening: falling asleep, during the night, during the day at rest, and during the day when engaged in daytime activities (not at rest). In addition, the subscales assessed satisfaction with sleep and severity of daytime tiredness/sleepiness. Scores for each of the 6 subscales ranged from 0 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely dissatisfied). The change from baseline was derived for each of the subscales and reported in this outcome measure. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Visit 9 (Month 12), compared to Baseline (in SP1006)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if a determination is made that the data cannot be adequately anonymized.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Restless Legs Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Rotigotine 1 mg/24 h

3
Subscribe