A Study of Rotigotine Patch in Adolescent Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome of Unknown Cause

October 5, 2023 updated by: UCB Biopharma SRL

A Remote, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Rotigotine Transdermal System in Adolescent Subjects With Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of rotigotine against placebo in adolescent subjects with idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) over a 12-week maintenance period and to investigate the safety and tolerability of rotigotine in adolescent subjects with idiopathic RLS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Culver City, California, United States, 90230
        • Sp1006 101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is male or female, and is >=13 and <18 years of age at Baseline
  • Subject's Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) symptoms cause significant daytime symptoms or significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, educational, or other important areas of functioning by the impact on sleep, energy/vitality, daily activities, behavior, cognition or mood
  • At Baseline, subject has a score of >=15 on the International Restless Legs Rating Scale (IRLS) (indicating moderate-to-severe RLS)
  • At Baseline, subject scores >=4 points on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 assessment (indicating at least moderately ill)
  • Subjects who are receiving supplemental iron have been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to Screening
  • Female subjects must be surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, or barrier and spermicide). Abstinence is an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 4 weeks after their final dose of study medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a serum ferritin level below the lower limit of normal at Visit 1/Screening
  • Subject has a hemoglobin level below the lower limit of normal at Visit 1/Screening
  • Subject has had previous treatment with dopamine agonists or L-dopa within 7 days prior to Visit 2/Baseline
  • Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize or compromise the subject's well-being or ability to participate in this study
  • Subject is pregnant or nursing
  • Subject is not willing to abstain from caffeine after 4 pm each evening within 7 days prior to Visit 2/Baseline and for the duration of the study
  • At Visit 1/Screening, subject has symptomatic orthostatic hypotension with a decrease of blood pressure (BP) from supine to standing position of >=20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or of >=10 mmHg in diastolic
  • Subject has secondary Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) (eg, due to renal insufficiency [uremia], iron deficiency, or rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Subject has a lifetime history of suicide attempts (including actual attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or had suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ("Yes") to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening (Visit 1)
  • Subject is taking a prohibited concomitant medication. Prohibited concomitant medication must have been discontinued at least 2 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2 milligram/24 hours rotigotine
Subjects randomized to this arm will be initiated on 1 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) rotigotine and up-titrated to a maximum of 2 mg/24 h rotigotine, which is the assigned dose level throughout the 12-week Maintenance Period.
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 1 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) (5 square centimeter (cm^2) patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 2 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) (10 square centimeter (cm^2) patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive matching placebo patches to maintain the blinding.
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: not applicable
Experimental: 3 milligram/24 hours rotigotine
Subjects randomized to this arm will be initiated on 1 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) rotigotine and up-titrated to a maximum of 3 mg/24 h rotigotine (1 mg/24 h patch + 2 mg/24 patch at the same time), which is the assigned dose level throughout the 12-week Maintenance Period.
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 1 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) (5 square centimeter (cm^2) patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Pharmaceutical Form: transdermal patch Route of administration: transdermal use Concentration: Application of rotigotine transdermal patch with 2 milligram (mg)/24 hours (h) (10 square centimeter (cm^2) patch size).
Other Names:
  • Neupro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in International Restless Legs Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)
The IRLS consisted of 10 questions, each scored using a 5-point scale ranging from 0=not present to 4=very severe. The IRLS sum score was calculated by summing up the single scores of all applicable questions, i.e., the total sum score ranged from 0 (no RLS symptoms present) to 40 (maximum severity in all symptoms). A score between 31 and 40, indicates very severe RLS. A score between 21 and 30 indicates severe RLS. A score between 11 and 20 indicates moderate RLS. A score between 1 and 10 indicates mild RLS and a score of 0 means no RLS. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 to the End of the Maintenance Period
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)
The Clinical Global Impressions Item 1 (Severity of Illness) score ranges from 0 to 7 as follows: 0=not assessed, 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill. The CGI Item 1 was completed during an interview between the participant and the investigator or designee. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 20)
TEAEs were defined as events that started during the Treatment Period or within 30 days following the end of the Treatment Period (i.e., on or after the date of first patch application and within 30 days following the date of last patch removal + 1 day), or those events where the intensity worsened within this time frame.
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 20)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawals
Time Frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 20)
TEAEs were defined as events that started during the Treatment Period or within 30 days following the end of the Treatment Period (i.e., on or after the date of first patch application and within 30 days following the date of last patch removal + 1 day), or those events where the intensity worsened within this time frame.
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 20)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Restless Legs-6 Rating Scales (RLS-6) to the End of the Maintenance Period
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)
The RLS-6 Rating Scales was designed to assess the severity of RLS and consisted of 6 subscales. The subscales assessed severity of symptoms at the following times of the day/evening: falling asleep, during the night, during the day at rest, and during the day when engaged in daytime activities. In addition, the subscales assessed satisfaction with sleep and severity of daytime tiredness/sleepiness. Scores for each of the 6 subscales ranged from 0 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely dissatisfied). The change from baseline was derived for each of the subscales and reported in this outcome measure. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
From Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period (Day 106)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed.All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Restless Legs Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Rotigotine 1 milligram/24 hours

3
Subscribe