Five-Plus Year Follow-Up of SMART Randomized Controlled Trial (SMART)

December 21, 2020 updated by: Relievant Medsystems, Inc.

Five-Plus Year Follow-Up of SMART (Surgical Multicenter Assessment of RF Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Back Pain) Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate long-term ongoing effectiveness of the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a prospective multi-center, nonintervention, observational, single arm post market data collection of the 5+ year effectiveness and satisfaction outcome for the SMART trial population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85020
        • Desert Institute for Spine Care
    • California
      • Daly City, California, United States, 94015
        • SpineCare Medical Group
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Memorial Orthopedic Surgical Group
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars Sinai Spine Center
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Drug Studies of America
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Indiana Spine Group
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, United States, 04074
        • Maine Medical Partners
    • Michigan
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48033
        • Michigan Orthopedics Instititute
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • OrthoCarolina
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Pacific Sports and Spine
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States, 19020
        • Rothman Orthopedic Institute
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Seton Spine and Scoliosis Center
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23235
        • Virginia iSpine Physicians

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

117 U.S. subjects treated per protocol in the treatment arm of the original SMART trial in the U.S.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LBP at least 6 months from original SMART Trial
  • RF Ablation Arm from SMART Trial

Exclusion Criteria:

-Control Arm Subjects from SMART Trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LS Mean Reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) From Baseline
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements
Validated questionnaire of low back pain related disability. Comprised of 10 questions evaluating the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living. The ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). Difference in mean ODI at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.
Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LS Mean Reduction in VAS From Baseline
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements
Numeric pain scale with minimum of 0 to maximum of 10; with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. Difference in mean VAS at baseline and at 5 years post treatment.
Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements
Responder Rates
Time Frame: At 5 year post treatment
Proportion of participants that achieve a threshold of > 15 point reduction in ODI and > 2 point reduction in VAS calculated as the difference between the baseline measurements and the 5 year post treatment measurements.
At 5 year post treatment
Narcotics Use
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and 5 years post treatment.
Proportion of participants using a narcotic more than once per week in the 30 days prior to the study visit. Difference in baseline to 5 year post treatment percentage measurements.
Difference between baseline and 5 years post treatment.
Injections
Time Frame: Difference from baseline percentage measurement to 5 years post treatment measurement
Proportion of participants receiving an injection for low back pain (adjudicated as same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) compared to baseline. Difference in percentage of participants at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.
Difference from baseline percentage measurement to 5 years post treatment measurement
Interventions
Time Frame: Measured form treatment data to 5 years post treatment visit date
Proportion of participants receiving a pain intervention or surgery for low back pain (adjudicated as the same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) from procedure date to 5 year visit date.
Measured form treatment data to 5 years post treatment visit date

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeff Fischgrund, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIP 0011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Basivertebral Nerve (BVN) Ablation

3
Subscribe