Non-invasive Current Stimulation for Restoration of Vision

November 6, 2020 updated by: Bernhard A. Sabel, University of Magdeburg

Non-invasive Current Stimulation for Restoration of Vision (REVIS) After Unilateral Occipital Stroke

The aim of the study is to evaluate effects of current stimulation of the brain on vision parameters, vision-related quality of life, and physiological parameters to uncover mechanisms of vision restoration. These include EEG-spectra and coherence measures, and visual evoked potentials. The design of stimulation protocols involves an appropriate sham-stimulation condition and sufficient follow-up periods to test whether the effects are stable. This is the first application of non-invasive current stimulation for vision rehabilitation in stroke-related visual field deficits.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39120
        • Institute of Medical Psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HH due to ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • age between 18 and 75 years
  • lesion age at least 6 months
  • stable visual field defect across baseline measurement (subjects with spontaneous fluctuations and recovery of vision excluded)
  • presence of residual vision and detectable gradual transition between the intact and the absolutely blind part of the visual field according to evaluation of the clinician
  • best corrected visual acuity at least 0.4 (20/50 Snellen) or better

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known active malignancy
  • eye or central nervous system diseases that interfere with the study (including poorly controlled glaucoma)
  • electric or electronic implants (e.g. heart pacemaker)
  • metal artifacts in the eyes or head (with the exception of dental prosthesis or shunts)
  • expected low compliance (e.g. in case of known psychiatric disease, known drug abuse, and dementing syndromes)
  • epileptic seizure within the last 10 years
  • use of antiepileptic or sedative drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Repetitive transorbital ACS with max 30 Hz, 1,5 mA for 10 days, 20 min/day
Sequential tDCS (anodal occipital stimulation with 2 mA for 20 min/day for 10 days) and rtACS
Experimental: rtACS
repetitive transorbital ACS
Repetitive transorbital ACS with max 30 Hz, 1,5 mA for 10 days, 20 min/day
Sequential tDCS (anodal occipital stimulation with 2 mA for 20 min/day for 10 days) and rtACS
Experimental: tDCS/rtACS
Sequential tDCS - tACS
Repetitive transorbital ACS with max 30 Hz, 1,5 mA for 10 days, 20 min/day
Sequential tDCS (anodal occipital stimulation with 2 mA for 20 min/day for 10 days) and rtACS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size of the visual field
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Mean threshold in standard static perimetry and and detection accuracy in HRP
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting EEG power spectra
Time Frame: 2 weeks
EEG measurement using 128 channel
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Research data will be avalaible without restriction

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the publication of the data

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact to the PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on repetitive transorbital AC Stimulation

3
Subscribe