vNOTES for Salpingo-oophorectomy

November 12, 2024 updated by: Dr. Aya Mohr-Sasson, Sheba Medical Center

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery- A New Approach to Salpingo-oophorectomy

The aim of this study is to compare the common approach of laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy to a new approach via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is an emerging field in minimally invasive surgery. NOTES can be performed via a variety of approaches, including through the stomach, esophagus, bladder, and rectum, but the majority of cases have been performed transvaginally (vNOTES).

The vNOTES technique includes conventional, laparoscopic instruments that are inserted through a single-port device that enables the insertion of 1 10-mm trocar, and 4 5-mm trocars. The operation in carried out placing the patient in the lithotomy position. After completing general anaesthesia, a 2.5-cm posterior colpotomy is made. The pouch of Douglas is opened and the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) port is inserted transvaginally. A pneumoperitoneum is created, and the pelvic cavity, including the uterus and the adnexa is demonstrated. Only then, the conventional laparoscopic instruments are inserted.

By incorporating the advantages of endoscopic surgery, the vNOTES approach avoids abdominal wall wounds and trocar-related complications, including reducing post operation pain. Moreover, recent studies report, shorter hospital stay, improved visibility, and the possibility to circumvent extensive lysis of adhesion to reach the pelvic cavity. It should be mentioned that operative risks such as : anesthesia complications, excessive blood loss, damage to near organs ( intestines or bladder), and vasculature damage exists in both conventional laparoscopy and vNOTES approach.

vNOTES technique has been used for hysterectomy and was proven to be just as good as laparoscopy with the advantage of daycare surgery. The use of vNOTES for salpingo-oophorectomy without concomitant hysterectomy has been questioned due to challenging accessibility. To the best of our knowledge, data concerning the experience using this technique for salpingo-oophorectomy is scarce and based on few published case-reports.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the common approach of laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy to a new approach via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Material and methods

This is a randomized prospective study including women admitted electively to a single care center for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to benign indication. Women that will be found to fit inclusion criteria will get by the research team explanation on both techniques. After giving informed consent, all women will be allocated to one of two operative techniques by en-block randomization:

  1. Laparoscopy
  2. vNOTES

Both operations will be done by a single highly skilled operator. All women will sign informed consent before admitted to operation room. Patient's demographics, characteristics, perioperative, operative and post-operative data will be collected from medical records. Data will be coded in order to save confidentiality ( each serial number will identify a patient. The list of serial numbers that fits each identification number will be available only for the principle investigator ).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Please Select
      • Ramat -Gan, Please Select, Israel, 52621
        • Aya Mohr Sasson
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective surgery
  • Benign indication for surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe endometriosis
  • Past pelvic operations
  • Suspected malignancy
  • Combined planned hysterectomy
  • Recurrent Pelvic Inflammatory disease (PID)
  • Vaginal anomaly

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laparoscopy
Abdominal conventional laparoscopy for salpingo-oophorectomy
Conventional abdominal laparoscopy
Active Comparator: vNOTES
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for salpingo-oophorectomy
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for salpingo-oophorectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra - Operative complication rate
Time Frame: Intra - Operative
Complications during operation as a compound outcome including - bleeding. damage to neer organs and vasculature damage
Intra - Operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Woman satisfaction rate post operation
Time Frame: Estimated on post operation day -1- through study completion, an average of 1 year
Satisfaction rate estimated by VAS -Visual Analogue Scale - A numeric satisfactory rating scale scoring 0 to 10, while 0 is not satisfied at all and 10 is highly satisfied .
Estimated on post operation day -1- through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aya Mohr-Sasson, Assuta Medical Center, Israel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopy

Subscribe