- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04021511
Early Prescription of Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules by a Nurse in the Management of Isolated Ankle Trauma (PARIAO)
Early Prescription of Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules by a Nurse in the Management of Isolated Ankle Trauma at the Emergency Department's Reception of the Hospital Center of Saint-Brieuc
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ankle sprain is an injury very frequently encountered during consultation in hospitals emergency departments. Its mechanism may at times leads to fracture. The Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) provide guidelines to clinicians concerning the need to perform radiographic test to verify whether patients with ankle injuries are suffering from fracture. If all clinical and anamnestic criteria are negative in accordance with the OAR, the probability of a fracture being present is about 0% (IC 95%). OAR are validated for adults.
Actually, a meta-analysis has suggested that it may be beneficial to introduce a nurse-initiated radiographic test protocol as a standard practice in emergency departments. However this early prescription is not a standard of care in most of emergency departments in France.
The implementation of OAR decreases irradiation levels of patients and reduces medical expenses. In addition, it allows to reduce patient's duration of stay in already encumbered emergency departments, thus reducing also overcrowding, which is known to be a major factor of non quality of care in such departments.
The study will be conducted in 2 phases of 4 weeks each :
- The first one (Phase A) will occur in the emergency department with the application of OAR only by the physicians (without changing the standard of care)
- The second one (Phase B) will occur after the Phase A, and nurses will apply OAR before physicians, according to the protocol.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Brieuc, France, 22027
- Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- With closed ankle injury less than 10 days old
- Affiliation to the national health insurance
- Written informed consent must be obtained
Exclusion Criteria:
- Trauma dating more than 10 days
- Patient not affiliated to the national health insurance
- X-ray performed before patient admission
- Other trauma than an isolated trauma of the ankle
- Injury other than ankle injury : calcaneus, toes, and Achilles' tendon
- Paraplegic or quadriplegic patient
- Previous admission to the Emergency Department for the same traumatic event
- Patient already included in the PARIAO study
- Isolated skin injury / isolated superficial injury
- Ankle fracture or obvious deformation
- Neuro-vascular deficit
- Mental disorder
- Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty
- Excessive alcoholization or intoxication by other psychoactive substances (physician's decision)
- Uncooperative patient
- Pregnancy in progress
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Phase A
The first one (Phase A) will occur in the emergency department with the application of OAR only by the physicians (without changing the standard of care) during 4 weeks
|
|
|
Experimental: Phase B
The second one (Phase B) will occur after the Phase A. Nurses will apply OAR according to the protocol.
This phase will also lasts 4 weeks.
|
As per protocol, in the Phase B, nurses will be allowed to apply OAR which can lead to an early radiography prescription.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time spent in emergency departement
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Difference of time spent in minutes in emergency department between Phase A group and Phase B group.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of x-rays
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Difference of the percentage of x-rays between Phase A group and Phase B group.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Time spent by nurse for patient care
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Difference of the time spent by nurse for patient care between Phase A group and Phase B group.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Comparaison of x-rays prescription between physicians and nurses
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Difference of percentage of x-rays prescribed by nurses and physicians in Phase B group.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Numbers of fractures identified by an x-ray requested by the physician in group B
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
For patients who have a fracture identified by an x-ray requested by the nurse or the physician : number of X-rays not requested by the nurse in the Phase B group.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Numbers of fractures identified by an x-ray requested by a nurse in group B
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
For patients who have a fracture identified by an x-ray requested by the nurse or the physician : number of X-rays not requested by the physician.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Other x-rays required
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
For patients whose x-ray was required, percentage of ankle x-ray performed while actually the trauma concerned the foot and not the ankle.
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
|
Satisfaction rate of nurses
Time Frame: through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Satisfaction rate of nurses evaluated through a questionnaire with 5 questions. Tittle : Nurse's satisfaction survey
|
through study completion, between 2 and 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3.
- Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Reardon M, Stewart JP, Maloney J. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1127-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127.
- Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, Naylor CD. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594.
- Fan J, Woolfrey K. The effect of triage-applied Ottawa Ankle Rules on the length of stay in a Canadian urgent care department: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):153-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.041. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
- Ho JK, Chau JP, Cheung NM. Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
- Allerston J, Justham D. Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Apr;8(2):110-5. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0103. Erratum In: Accid Emerg Nurs 2000 Oct;8(4):253.
- Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;35(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70105-3.
- Lau LH, Kerr D, Law I, Ritchie P. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2013 Aug;16(3):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHSB_201905_P1_PARIAO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergencies
-
Société Française d'Anesthésie et de RéanimationNot yet recruiting
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedPerformance in Simulated Emergencies | Stress During Simulator Scenario | Behaviour of Physicians in Simulated EmergenciesGermany
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRecruitingMedical EmergenciesFrance
-
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardRecruitingMedical EmergenciesUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad de AntioquiaCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...UnknownMedical EmergenciesChina
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyZentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in DeutschlandUnknownNon-urgent EmergenciesGermany
-
Peking University People's HospitalBeijing Emergency Medical Center; Beijing Red Cross Emergency CenterCompletedEmergencies [Disease/Finding]China
-
Chinese University of Hong KongUnknownEmergencies | Cancer | Oncologic Complications and EmergenciesChina
Clinical Trials on OAR application by a nurse
-
Universiteit AntwerpenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleCompletedHypertension | Diabetes Mellitus | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | Dyslipidemias | Airway Obstruction
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedBronchopulmonary Dysplasia | PrematurityUnited States
-
University Hospital, LilleCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilCompleted
-
Diakonhjemmet HospitalSt. Olavs HospitalCompleted
-
Ataturk UniversityRecruitingAnxiety | Surgery | Fear | Relaxation Exercise | Therapeutic ClownTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionNot yet recruitingFebrile Neutropenia | Oncopediatrics
-
CHU de ReimsRecruitingCatheter Related ComplicationFrance
-
University of JenaUnknown