Mindfulness-based Therapy Versus Relaxation in Prevention of Burnout in Medical Students (MUSTPrevent)

Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Therapy vs. Relaxation in Prevention of Burnout in Medical Students : A Multicenter, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study

A recent survey exploring mental health in a large cohort of French medical students and young graduates (N = 21.768), observed that 68.2% of participants showed pathologic anxiety. A high level of depressive symptomatology was found in 27.7% of participants, while suicidal ideation was reported by 23.7%. Mindfulness Based Interventions are beneficial for health with a positive impact on mood, anxiety, and well-being. It thus can be hypothesized that such interventions could help to prevent anxio-depressive symptomatology in medical students.

The implementation of prevention programs to promote resilience to stress and empathy among medical students is a priority, included in French National Strategy for Health. Efficacy of Mindfulness Based Interventions in French university must be studied to confirm and strengthen their development. The originality of this project consists in the collaboration of medical schools from different cities and the longitudinal follow-up.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a mindfulness-based therapy in burnout prevention in comparison to relaxation.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Depression; Burnout; Emotional Disturbances
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction; Other: Relaxation group

Detailed Description

Recent research highlights the positive impact of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on mental health outcomes and in the development of stress management skills and compassion. Moreover, it has been reported that Mindfulness-Based Interventions are well accepted among university students, mainly because these approaches are seen as emotional skill training rather than a mental health intervention. However, there is a lack of long-term follow-up studies testing the maintenance of benefits.

This study proposes Mindfulness-based interventions for preventive purposes in a large sample of fourth and fifth year medical students from different French cities (Montpellier, Angers, Clermont-Ferrand, Marseille, Nîmes, Paris, Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg, Tours, Lyon and Toulouse) and a one-year follow-up.

The main objective is to assess the efficacy of a Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) (intervention) vs. Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training (PMRT) (control) to prevent burnout (emotional exhaustion) of fourth- and fifth-year medical students after one-year follow-up.

The study also aims to :

1. assess efficacy of MBSR vs. PMRT in fourth- and fifth-year medical students to prevent burnout after six-months (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and professional achievement) and one year follow-up (depersonalization and professional achievement) ;
2. compare anxio-depressive symptomatology, suicidality, drug consumption, mindfulness skills, empathy, quality of life between pre- and post-intervention, at 6- and 12 months follow-up ;
3. investigate the adherence and acceptability of the protocol ;
4. investigate acceptability and outcomes according to personality traits.

The study is a single blind randomized clinical trial. Overall, 612 students from 11 French universities will be enrolled and assigned randomly to two groups:

1. the MBSR group, which will benefit from a structured 8-week group mindfulness-based stress reduction program;
2. the PMRT group, which will benefit from Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training based on a structured 8-week group program.

Participants will be evaluated at four times: before the intervention (within 8 weeks), within the month following the end of the program, at 6 months and 12 months (+/- 1 month) after the completion of the program. All of the follow-up visits may be carried out remotely. The raters will be blind to treatment allocation (single-blind).

An optional qualitative study will be conducted among 30 students, during the first follow-up visit to assess the subjective experience of participation in relaxation and meditation programs.

The benefits expected from MBSR vs PMRT are to increase mental resources to manage negative emotions and psychological distress, to reduce risk of depression, to increase empathy. The perspectives are to improve the state of the art about the efficacy of MBSR for student's mental health promotion and to help the development of life skills programs for young people and students as proposed by General Direction of Health at the national level. Such programs promote low-cost and safety non-pharmacologic evidence-based interventions for psychological distress.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 612
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Emilie OLIE, MD PhD; Phone Number: +33 4 67 33 85 81; Email: e-olie@chu-montpellier.fr
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Carolina BAEZA VELASCO, Psychology; Email: carolina.baeza-velasco@parisdescartes.fr

Study Locations

• France
  • Montpellier, France, 34295
    • Recruiting
    • CHU Montpellier
    • Contact: Myriam Benramdane; Phone Number: + 33 4 67 99 61 45 75; Email: m-benramdane@chu-montpellier.fr

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Being enrolled in fourth or fifth year medical study
• Having signed the informed consent
• Being able to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all trial procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

• Suffering from a current depressive episode according to DSM-5 criteria
• Suffering from a current panic disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
• Pregnancy
• Exclusion period in relation to another protocol
• Not being affiliated to the French National Social Security System
• Having reached 4500 € annual compensation for participation in clinical trials
• Protection by law (guardianship or curatorship)
• Deprivation of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision)
• Planned longer stay outside the region that prevents compliance with the visit plan
• For Paris students : participation in the optional teaching "Pleine conscience et médecine" (organized by Cloé Brami)
• For Tours students : participation in the optional teaching on meditation organized by the faculty of medicine
• For Strasbourg students : participation in the optional teaching on meditation (organized by Pr Bloch)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR); 306 participants will be randomized in the MBSR program, consisting of 8 weekly sessions lasting 2 and half hours each. In addition to this, they will be asked to complete 30 minutes of home practice each day. In order to avoid forgetting techniques and to reinforce motivation, a MBSR recall session will be offered six month after intervention. All the sessions may be carried out remotely, by videoconference. In this case, both programs should be conducted in this way in order to ensure comparability..	Other: Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction; MBSR teaches mindfulness meditation and mindful yoga exercises to develop non-judgmental awareness of moment-to-moment experience. The intervention duration is 8 weeks, with weekly two and half hours sessions. It will be delivered according to the fundamental concepts and specific techniques provided in the MBSR manualized protocol by Kabat-Zinn. The program also includes 30-min daily homework exercises. MBSR teaches four main mindfulness practices: (1) body scan, a process of moving attention through the body; (2) mindful movement, consisting of gentle yoga stretches to develop awareness of body in movement; (3) sitting meditation; and (4) walking meditation. Inquiry and didactic teaching is also a part of MBSR and allows for some detailed exploration of participants' experiences.
Active Comparator: Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training (PMRT); 306 participants will be randomized in a relaxation program, consisting of 8 weekly sessions lasting 2 and half hours each. In addition to this, they will be asked to complete 30 minutes of home practice each day. In order to avoid forgetting techniques and to reinforce motivation, a relaxation recall session will be offered six month after intervention. All the sessions may be carried out remotely, by videoconference. In this case, both programs should be conducted in this way in order to ensure comparability	Other: Relaxation group; control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Emotional exhaustion assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses emotional exhaustion through 9 items. A score below 17 indicates a low degree of emotional exhaustion, a score between 18 and 29 indicates a moderate degree of emotional exhaustion and a score above 30 indicates a high degree of emotional exhaustion. Higher scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Emotional exhaustion assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Description: Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses emotional exhaustion through 9 items. A score below 17 indicates a low degree of emotional exhaustion, a score between 18 and 29 indicates a moderate degree of emotional exhaustion and a score above 30 indicates a high degree of emotional exhaustion. Higher scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 6 months
Depersonalization assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses depersonalization through 5 items. A score below 5 indicates a low degree of depersonalization, a score between 6 and 11 indicates a moderate degree of depersonalization and a score above 12 indicates a high degree of depersonalization. Higher scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 6 months
Depersonalization assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses depersonalization through 5 items. A score below 5 indicates a low degree of depersonalization, a score between 6 and 11 indicates a moderate degree of depersonalization and a score above 12 indicates a high degree of depersonalization. Higher scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 12 months
Professional achievement assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses personal accomplishment through 8 items. A score below 33 indicates a low degree of personal accomplishment, a score between 34 and 39 indicates a moderate degree of personal accomplishment and a score above 40 indicates a high degree of personal accomplishment. Lower scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 6 months
Professional achievement assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)	Evaluation of the emotional exhaustion based on the MBI score. The MBI contains three subscales, one of which assesses personal accomplishment through 8 items. A score below 33 indicates a low degree of personal accomplishment, a score between 34 and 39 indicates a moderate degree of personal accomplishment and a score above 40 indicates a high degree of personal accomplishment. Lower scores reflect greater experienced burnout.	at 12 months
Psychotropic and analgesic consumption	Collection of the name and dosage per month for each molecule	at 6 months
Psychotropic and analgesic consumption	Collection of the name and dosage per month for each molecule	at 12 months
Tobacco consumption	Number of cigarettes per day within the month	at 6 months
Tobacco consumption	Number of cigarettes per day within the month	at 12 months
Alcohol consumption	Frequency of the alcohol consumption within the month	at 6 months
Alcohol consumption	Quantity of the alcohol consumption within the month	at 6 months
Alcohol consumption	Frequency of the alcohol consumption within the month	at 12 months
Alcohol consumption	Quantity of the alcohol consumption within the month	at 12 months
Alcohol consumption assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)	Quantity of alcohol consumed within the month as assessed with the AUDIT. Higher scores reflect high risk drinking	at 12 months
Alcohol consumption assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)	Frequency of alcohol consumed within the month as assessed with the AUDIT. Higher scores reflect high risk drinking	at 12 months
Drug consumption	Collection of the name of consumed substances, frequency of the consumption within the month	at 6 months
Drug consumption	Collection of the name of consumed substances, quantity of the consumption within the month	at 6 months
Drug consumption	Collection of the name of consumed substances, frequency of the consumption within the month	at 12 months
Drug consumption	Collection of the name of consumed substances, quantity of the consumption within the month	at 12 months
Drug consumption assessed with the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)	Drug consumption based on the DAST score. The total score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the score the greater the problem related to drug consumption.	at 12 months
Cannabis consumption	Frequency of the cannabis consumption within the month	at 6 months
Cannabis consumption	Quantity of the cannabis consumption within the month	at 6 months
Cannabis consumption	Frequency of the cannabis consumption within the month	at 12 months
Cannabis consumption	Quantity of the cannabis consumption within the month	at 12 months
Cannabis consumption assessed with the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST)	Cannabis consumption based on the CAST score. The total score ranges from 0 to 24. The higher the score the greater the problem related to cannabis consumption.	at 12 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the MADRS score. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores between 0 and 6 indicates no depression, scores between 7 and 19 indicates mild depression, scores between 20 and 34 indicates moderate depression and scores above 34 reflects severe depression.	at 6 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the MADRS score. The total score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores between 0 and 6 indicates no depression, scores between 7 and 19 indicates mild depression, scores between 20 and 34 indicates moderate depression and scores above 34 reflects severe depression.	at 12 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the HADS score. The questionnaire is divided in two subscales, one for anxiety and one for depression. Each subscore ranges from 0 to 21. Scores greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate anxious or depressive symptomatology.	at 6 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the HADS score. The questionnaire is divided in two subscales, one for anxiety and one for depression. Each subscore ranges from 0 to 21. Scores greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate anxious or depressive symptomatology.	at 12 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the PSS score. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores reflect greater stress level.	at 6 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the PSS score. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores reflect greater stress level.	at 12 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Numerical Scale for psychological pain	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the Numerical Scale for psychological pain. The questionnaire is divided in three subscales, one for current psychological pain, one for usual psychological pain within the 15 last days and one for maximal psychological pain within the 15 last days. Each scale ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater psychological pain.	at 6 months
Anxio-depressive symptomatology assessed with the Numerical Scale for psychological pain	Anxio-depressive symptomatology based on the Numerical Scale for psychological pain. The questionnaire is divided in three subscales, one for current psychological pain, one for usual psychological pain within the 15 last days and one for maximal psychological pain within the 15 last days. Each scale ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater psychological pain.	at 12 months
Suicidality assessed with the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)	Evaluation of suicidality through the C-SSRS. The suicidal ideation severity subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more severe ideation). The intensity of ideation subscale includes 5 questions each one ranging from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more intense ideation). The suicidal behavior subscale includes 4 yes/no questions. The suicidal behavior lethality subscale inquires about the level of actual or potential medical damage.	at 6 months
Suicidality assessed with the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)	Evaluation of suicidality through the C-SSRS. The suicidal ideation severity subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more severe ideation). The intensity of ideation subscale includes 5 questions each one ranging from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more intense ideation). The suicidal behavior subscale includes 4 yes/no questions. The suicidal behavior lethality subscale inquires about the level of actual or potential medical damage.	at 12 months
Empathy assessed with the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for students	Evaluation of empathy based on the Jefferson Scale Empathy score. The total score ranges from 20 to 140. Higher scores reflect higher empathy.	at 6 months
Empathy assessed with the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for students	Evaluation of empathy based on the Jefferson Scale Empathy score. The total score ranges from 20 to 140. Higher scores reflect higher empathy.	at 12 months
Quality of life assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)	Quality of life based on the WHOQOL score. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect better health.	at 6 months
Quality of life assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)	Quality of life based on the WHOQOL score. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect better health.	at 12 months
Mindfulness assessed with the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)	Evaluation of mindfulness skills based on the FFMQ score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness ability.	at 6 months
Mindfulness assessed with the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)	Evaluation of mindfulness skills based on the FFMQ score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of mindfulness ability.	at 12 months
Self- compassion assessed with the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS)	Evaluation of self-compassion skills based on the SCS score. The total score ranges from 26 to 130. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-compassion.	at 6 months
Self- compassion assessed with the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS)	Evaluation of self-compassion skills based on the SCS score. The total score ranges from 26 to 130. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-compassion.	at 12 months
Program adherence	Program adherence assessed with the number of attended sessions and the rates of dropout.	at 12 months
Program acceptability	Program acceptability assessed with frequency of formal & informal practice of mindfulness, numerical rating scale for satisfaction and time spent doing exercises per week.	at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University Hospital, Montpellier
• Collaborators: Hospices Civils de Lyon; University Hospital, Angers; University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes; University Hospital, Toulouse; University Hospital, Tours; University Hospital, Marseille; University Hospital, Paris; University Hospital, Strasbourg; University Hospital of Saint-Etienne; INSERM U1061 Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Baeza-Velasco C, Genty C, Jaussent I, Benramdane M, Courtet P, Olie E. Study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based intervention versus relaxation to reduce emotional exhaustion in medical students in France: the "Must prevent" study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 11;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02529-9.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 4, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): March 4, 2024
• Study Completion (Anticipated): September 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 9, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 18, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 22, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 21, 2021
• Last Verified: December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: mindfulness; medical students; empathy; burnout prevention; emotional exhaustion
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Behavioral Symptoms; Stress, Psychological; Burnout, Psychological; Affective Symptoms
• Other Study ID Numbers: RECHMPL19_0063; 2019-A01050-57 (Registry Identifier: ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No