Health Status and Its Socio-economic Covariates of the Older Population in Poland - the Nationwide PolSenior2 Survey. (PolSenior2)

July 17, 2019 updated by: Tomasz Zdrojewski, Medical University of Gdansk

Health Status and Its Socio-economic Covariates of the Older Population in Poland - the Nationwide, Cross-sectional PolSenior2 Survey.

The PolSenior2 survey is aimed to characterise health status of old and very-old adults in Poland.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One of the goals is assessing the prevalence and control of age-related diseases and of the "geriatric giants" (immobility, instability, incontinence, sensory deficiency, cognition and mood disorders) which lead to frailty, disability and dependence. Monitoring of health status, health behaviors and identifying socio-economic factors favoring successful aging will be significant. As the polypragmasy and adverse drug reactions remain a significant issue in the geriatric care, pharmacotherapy and medical adherence will also be examined.

The additional purpose of the study is to evaluate the utilization and access to health care and social services in respect to needs for assistance and long-term care, as well as the level and different forms of these needs.

The project is planned as a cross-sectional survey of representative sample of 6000 people aged 60 years and over. The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests. The data are collected by well-trained nurses during three visits at respondents homes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

6000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gdańsk, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of Gdansk
        • Contact:
          • Tomasz R. Zdrojewski, MD, Prof
          • Phone Number: +48 58 3491975
          • Email: tz@gumed.edu.pl
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The research population is assumed to include 6000 individuals in seven equivalent age cohorts (60-64 years, 65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years, 80-84 years, 85-89 years, 90+ years old) with equal representation of males and females in each of them.

Research participants were randomly recruited in a stratified, proportional draw. The pattern for respondent selection was designed to obtain a population representative for Polish old citizens.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 60 years of age,
  • randomly selected from database of all Polish citizens,
  • consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 60 years of age,
  • no consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
60 - 65 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
65 - 69 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
70 - 74 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
75 - 79 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
80 - 84 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
85 - 89 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
≥90 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status as assessed by Vulnerable Elders Survey-13
Time Frame: baseline
The Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) is a simple function-based tool for screening community-dwelling populations to identify older persons at risk for health deterioration. The VES-13 considers age, self-related health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating increased disability.
baseline
Functional status as assessed by Instrumental Activity of Daily Living
Time Frame: baseline
This will be assessed using the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton) instrument. IADL evaluates independent living skills. Each activity has specific level of participation that can be selected. Scores range from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 points (high function, independent).
baseline
Functional status as assessed by Activity of Daily Living Index
Time Frame: baseline
This will be assessed using the Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index) instrument. ADL evaluates functional status as a measurement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living. Each activity is rated as being completed independently or not. Scores range is 0-6 points, higher score is better.
baseline
Mood deterioration incidence
Time Frame: baseline
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a 15-item self-report assessment designed specifically to identify symptoms of depression in the elderly. Participants are asked to respond by answering yes or no in reference to how they felt over the past 2 weeks. The score 5 and more suggests the suspicion of depression, higher scores indicate more severe depressive syndrome. The final diagnosis of depression needs clinical assessment.
baseline
Cognitive functions as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: baseline
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) investigates specific cognitive functions. Scale range: 0-30. The score 23 and below indicates significant deterioration of cognitive functions and dementia. Score between 24-27 indicates mild cognitive impairment. Normal score ranges between 28-30.
baseline
Cognitive functions as assessed by Clock Drawing Test
Time Frame: baseline
The Clock Drawing Test is a test used for the assessment of cognitive impairment based on sketches of a clock completed by a patient. The assessment is based on identifying abnormalities in the drawings, which may include poor number positioning, omission of numbers, incorrect sequencing, missing clock hands and the presence of irrelevant writing. According to Sunderland the score is: 0-10. Higher score indicates normal cognitive functions.
baseline
Comorbidities incidence
Time Frame: baseline
the prevalence of comorbidities
baseline
Nutritional status assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire (MNA)
Time Frame: baseline
The MNA is a validated nutrition screening and assessment tool that can identify geriatric patients age 65 and above who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. The Screening score(max. 14 points) is 12-14 points indicates "Normal nutritional status", 8-11 points indicates "At risk of malnutrition", 0-7 points indicates "Malnourished". For the full assessment there are proposed scores: 24 pts and more "Normal nutritional status"; 23,5-17 "At risk of malnutrition"; below 17 - malnourished"
baseline
Sarkopenia incidence
Time Frame: baseline
The prevalence of sarcopenia will be assessed by analysis of grip strength (use of dynamometer).
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of drugs taken
Time Frame: baseline
assessement of pharmacotherapy and polypragmasy
baseline
Medical care availability
Time Frame: five years back from baseline
number of hospitalizations and of outpatients visits in last five years
five years back from baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Age (WHOQOL-AGE)
Time Frame: baseline
The WHOQOL-AGE has been designed and validated to measure quality of life older adults. It provides a single score that ranges on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
baseline
Quality and patterns of sleep assessmed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: baseline
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index has been designed and validated to assess the presence of sleep disorders. It includes 19 questions that combine to evaluate 7 components of sleep, each evaluated from 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulty, 3 = severe difficulty). A total score greater than 5 indicates a sleep disorder.
baseline
Alcohol abuse assessment
Time Frame: baseline
Alcohol abuse will be assessed using the Short Michigan Alcohol Screening (SMASM). This 10 item inventory characterizes behavior associated with alcoholism, the higher the score, the greater the severity of alcoholism in a respondent.
baseline
Physical activity assessmed by the Seven-Day Recall Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAR)
Time Frame: baseline
Minutes of physical activity measured by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (7-Day PAR), which is an interviewer-administered self-report physical activity measure of minutes spent in moderate and vigorous intensity leisure and non-leisure activities over the preceding 7 days. Low time span (low number of minutes) spent on physical activity suggest low level of it and is one of significant symptoms of frailty syndrome.
baseline
Presence and severity of chronic pain assessmed by the Pain Assessment Scale (PAS)
Time Frame: baseline
measurement by the Pain Assessment Scale (PAS)
baseline
Presence and severity of chronic pain assessmed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline
VAS is a self-assessed maximum pain reported using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale, where 100 signifies maximum pain.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6/5/4.2/NPZ/2017/1203/1257

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Aging

Clinical Trials on medical history, blood and urine tests

Subscribe