Psychological Determinants of the Therapeutic Observance of Osteoporotic Patients (OSTEOPSY)

Psychological déterminants of the Therapeutic Observance of Osteoporotic Patients

Osteoporosis is a skeletal pathology characterized by decreased bone mass and deterioration of bone tissue. This pathology affects predominantly women, which is estimated that 40% of them will suffer an osteoporotic fracture. The incidence of osteoporosis, thus representing a major public health problem where osteoporotic fractures have a higher incidence than those combined with cardiovascular disease and breast cancer (INSERM, 2016; WHO 2008). It causes traumatic fractures that have the effect of dependence and loss of functional autonomy associated, in terms, with the risk of a reduction in life expectancy. The management of osteoporosis therefore becomes an issue for rheumatologists. The latter involves both compliance with hygienic-Dietetic measures (such as calcium intake, physical activities, prevention of falls...) and medicated treatments whose action is intended, for some, to block bone destruction or, for others to stimulate bone formation. The efficacy of drug treatments is now proven, these treatments are however profitable only if the therapeutic adherence of the patients is maximal. However, rheumatologists and researchers generally find an average rate of 70% enrolment after 6 months of treatment, most often lowered to 50% after 12 months of treatment, thus increasing fractures.

On the other hand, the literature informs the medical and educational aspects of the problem of non-observance in osteoporotic patients, but curiously, it does not say anything of the psychological aspects likely to be linked to these behaviors of non-adherence to therapy.

The objective of this thesis work is to take an interest in the underlying psychological determinants that may explain the behaviour of adherence and/or non-adherence of osteoporotic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Moselle
      • Metz, Moselle, France, 57085
        • CHR Metz Thionville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will focus on a sample of 200 post-menopausal osteoporotic patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be treated with an anti-osteoporotic drug for at least three months
  • Mastering the French language orally and in writing
  • Have obtained the patient's oral agreement to participate in the research
  • Present post-menopausal osteoporosis
  • Present a densitometric osteoporosis with a T-score (-2.5) treated medically per OS (example: biphosphonates) or by subcutaneous injection (example: prolia)
  • Present a history of severe osteoporotic fractures after falls of its height.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present a psychiatric history
  • Present an intellectual disability
  • Present major cognitive disorders related to neurodegenerative disease or other nervous system disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to therapy
Time Frame: Day 1
The influence of psychological emission on the therapeutic adherence is measured with an adherence scale (EGOMAC) which includes 3 items: drugs observance, hygiene compliance and dietary restrictions. The item are scored on a 4-point scale with 1-strongly disagree; 2-disagree, 3-agree and 4-fully agree.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to therapy
Time Frame: Year 1
The influence of psychological emission on the therapeutic adherence is measured with an adherence scale (EGOMAC) which includes 3 items: drugs observance, hygiene compliance and dietary restrictions. The item are scored on a 4-point scale with 1-strongly disagree; 2-disagree, 3-agree and 4-fully agree.
Year 1
Perception of disease
Time Frame: day 1
with the validated Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire.The Brief IPQ has nine items rated on a scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). The first five assess cognitive perceptions such as effect on life; duration of illness control over illness; beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment, and experience of symptoms. Items 6 and 8 assess emotional aspects to include concern about illness and a multifaceted question about mood. Item 7 assesses degree of understanding of the illness. The final item is open-ended asking respondent to rank the 3 most impotant factors causing their illness.
day 1
Perception of treatment
Time Frame: day 1
Wit the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire which comprises 18 items which assesses medication beliefs in general and in specific conditions allowing for the investigation of the overall perceptions of medication in general as well as perceptions of medication in their chronic disease. The item are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with scores ranging from 4 to 20.
day 1
Anxiety
Time Frame: day 1
Anxiety is measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale composed of 14 items, seven items for the anxiety subscale and seven for the depression subscale. Each item is scored on a response-scale with four alternatives ranging between 0 and 3. For both subscale, score of less than 7 indicates non-cases; between 8 and 10: mild; between 11 and 14: moderate and between 15 and 21: severe.
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Subscribe