Digital Design for Maxillofacial Prosthetics

May 31, 2022 updated by: David Zopf, University of Michigan

Pilot Study on High Resolution 3D Digital Scanning for Maxillofacial Prosthetics for Feasibility and Efficacy

This study will use a 3D scanner to print a 3D model or mold for each patient's prosthesis. The goal of this study to provide patients with a new, faster method of imaging and creating prostheses that preserves the quality of the current method while reducing time spent by both the patient and providers. Patients that are eligible will have a non-invasive 3D scanner (Artec Space Spider) to image the indicated areas of their head and face to help create their new prosthesis. Patients will come in for visits as needed to fit and adjust their prosthetic. Additionally, patients will be asked to complete questionnaires and have follow-up visits at certain time -points pre and post prosthetic completion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48170
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Maxillofacial anatomic defect or anomaly that limits function or cosmesis (including facial and/or intraoral)
  • Stable defect (no clinically active tumor or plans for major reconstructive surgery)
  • The patient (or family) have elected to pursue a prosthetic reconstruction of a craniofacial anomaly
  • The patient is amenable to 3D surface scanning rather than facial molding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to silicone
  • Poor candidate for prosthetic reconstruction
  • Developmental concerns regarding aspiration risk

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D digital scanning for maxillofacial prosthetics
The non-invasive Artec Space Spider 3D scanner will be used to image the indicated areas of the patients head and face. In the case of an intraoral defect, the noninvasive TRIOS intraoral 3D scanner will be used. The study may also use nasometry or nasal endoscopy to measure the amount of airflow through the patient's fistula to help guide the design. The software that will be used will create a 3D image of the prosthesis during the patient's clinic appointment. Once a model of the prosthesis is fully designed and manufactured, the patient will return to clinic for a second appointment which may involve fitting and coloring. A subsequent appointment will involve delivery of a successfully fitted and colored prosthesis that the patient will take home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number or weeks to create the final prosthesis
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Time the participants spend in the clinic
Time Frame: up to 6 months
This includes time spent with participant to design the prosthetic
up to 6 months
Number of hours spent to create the prosthetic
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The number of hours will be calculated by using the design software, scanners, printing, and modifying the mold and prosthesis.
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction measured by modified Toronto Outcome Measure of Craniofacial Prosthetics (TOMCP) for intraoral prosthesis.
Time Frame: up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Survey questions are all created using a 7-point Likert scale for assessment. Questions 10-17 from the survey will be used to measure the patients prosthesis level of satisfaction (the higher the score the more satisfied). These will be completed pre-prosthesis and at 1 month and 6 months post prosthesis for patients with intraoral prosthesis.
up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Satisfaction measured by modified Toronto Outcome Measure of Craniofacial Prosthetics (TOMCP) for extraoral prosthesis.
Time Frame: up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Survey questions are all created using a 7-point Likert scale for assessment. Questions 8-19 from the survey will be used to measure the patients level of satisfaction (the higher the score the more satisfied). These will be completed pre-prosthesis and at 1 month and 6 months post prosthesis for patients with extraoral prosthesis.
up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Quality of life measures by modified Toronto Outcome Measure of Craniofacial Prosthetics (TOMCP) for intraoral prosthesis.
Time Frame: up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Survey questions are all created using a 7-point Likert scale for assessment. Questions 1-9 from the survey will be used to measure the patients level of quality of life (the higher score indicates better quality). These will be completed pre-prosthesis and at 1 month and 6 months post prosthesis for patients with intraoral prosthesis.
up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Quality of life measures by modified Toronto Outcome Measure of Craniofacial Prosthetics (TOMCP) for extraoral prosthesis.
Time Frame: up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Survey questions are all created using a 7-point Likert scale for assessment. Questions 1-7 from the survey will be used to measure the patients quality of life (the higher score indicates be better quality). These will be completed pre-prosthesis and at 1 month and 6 months post prosthesis for patients with extraoral prosthesis.
up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
Number of adverse events related to the prosthetic
Time Frame: up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used
This study will collect and report adverse events (serious and non-serious) at least possibly related to the prosthetic.
up to 6 months after the prosthetic is completed and being used

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Zopf, MD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maxillofacial Abnormalities

Clinical Trials on 3D digital scanning for maxillofacial prosthetics

3
Subscribe