Study of HEMAX PFS Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

January 26, 2021 updated by: Bio Sidus SA

A Randomized, Comparative Study of HEMAX PFS® Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in the Treatment of Anemia With Epoetin Alfa in Patients With Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. A study designed as phase III, in 120 patients with chronic renal failure in the pre-dialysis stage, evaluate efficacy and safety of Hemax PFS® (PFS: prefilled syringes) vs the innovator erythropoietin alfa product (Eprex®).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • CIMEL
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • CEMEDIC
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • CEREHA
      • Caba, Argentina
        • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
      • Caba, Argentina
        • CIPREC (Centro de Investigación y Prevención Cardiovascular)
      • Caba, Argentina
        • GEMA Consultorio
      • Caba, Argentina
        • Hospital Argerich
      • Caba, Argentina
        • Hospital Durand
      • Caba, Argentina
        • Hospital Fernandez
      • Caba, Argentina
        • Hospital Ramos Mejia
      • Asunción, Paraguay
        • IPHIC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years
  • Patients with pre-dialysis chronic renal failure (CRF) defined by a glomerular filtration rate (calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study formula) ≥15 ml/ min and <60 ml/ min, by 1.73 m2
  • Anemic patients that should be treated and levels of hemoglobin <10.5 g/dl and ≥ 7.5 g/dl.
  • Patients that have the will and capacity to sign a written inform consent.
  • Post-menopause women for at least 2 years, or sterile by surgery for at least 6 months. Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline and be willing to get an adequate method of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are planned to be on dialysis or have a renal transplant in the following 6 months.
  • Transferrin iron Saturation < 20%.
  • Etiology of renal failure (as secondary to autoimmune diseases) that, to the judge to the physician, can affect the normal development of the protocol.
  • Active bleeding or history of hemorrhage that have led to a significative decrease of hematocrit in the last 30 days.
  • Non-controlled hypertension (≥160 mm Hg of systolic pressure and/or ≥100 mm Hg of diastolic pressure with anti-hypertensive treatment).
  • Anemia caused by any other cause than renal disease.
  • Having a transfusion in the last 3 months before basal visit or during screening.
  • Treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulant in the last 3 months before basal visit or screening.
  • Increase risk of thromboembolic disease: history of arterial thromboembolia (stroke, transient ischemic attack, Acute coronary syndrome, etc.) in the last 6 months or venous in the last 12 months before screening; surgery in the last month before screening; prolong immobilization or orthopedic surgery programmed in the following 6 months or any other condition that to the judge of the investigator can increase the risk of thromboembolism.
  • Hematological disease or myelodysplastic syndrome or history of hematological neoplasm or solid tumor in the last 5 years.
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Refuse to participate in the protocol or any medical condition, that in the investigator opinion, is significant to prevent the participant from being included in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Eprex/Erypo

Receive EPREX/ ERYPO® subcutaneously with an initial dose of 29 IU/ kg twice a week (2000 IU twice a week for 70 kg of weight), to be titrated according to the scheme that is summarized below.

There will be a follow - up of patients with visits to the site every two weeks during the first 12 weeks of dose titration that will be followed by 12 additional weeks of dose maintenance with visits every 4 weeks.

Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin
EXPERIMENTAL: Hemax PFS

receive HEMAX® PFS subcutaneously with an initial dose of 29 IU/ kg twice a week (2000 IU twice a week for 70 kg of weight), to be titrated according to the scheme that is summarized below.

There will be a follow - up of patients with visits to the site every two weeks during the first 12 weeks of dose titration that will be followed by 12 additional weeks of dose maintenance with visits every 4 weeks.

Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy Evaluation through the increase of Hemoglobin levels
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through increased levels of hemoglobin from baseline value to the mean value of the 8 to 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus EPREX/ ERYPO®.
12 weeks of treatment
Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions (safety and tolerability) at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the safety through the incidence of adverse events and adverse reactions after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
12 weeks of treatment
Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions (safety and tolerability) at week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the safety through the incidence of adverse events and adverse reactions after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
24 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of responders patients
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the percentage of responder patients (increase of Hb ≥ 1g/ dl) after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX® PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
12 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients that required any Transfusion
Time Frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Evaluate the percentage of transfusional requirement after 12 weeks of treatment, comparing patients treated with HEMAX PFS versus those treated with EPREX/ ERYPO®.
12 weeks of treatment
Change of Hemoglobin level at week 12 of treatment
Time Frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 12
Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of treatment with erythropoietin alfa through the change in the level of hemoglobin from baseline in every visit until the week 12 visit.
Intragroup efficacy until week 12
Evaluate the efficacy between arms 24 weeks: week doses in the titration
Time Frame: Intragroup efficacy until week 24
Evaluate the efficacy between arms (HEMAX® PFS and EPREX/ ERYPO®) of the change from the twice - a - week doses in the titration phase to a weekly dose in the maintenance phase through the changes in the hemoglobin levels from week 12 to weeks 16, 20 and 24 of treatment
Intragroup efficacy until week 24
Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (immunogenicity)
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks of treatment
An anti-erythropoietin alfa antibody determination will be performed to evaluate treatment immunogenicity at week 12 and 24 visit
12 and 24 weeks of treatment
Concentration of Hepcidin
Time Frame: 24 weeks of treatment
Hepcidin will be analyzed by ELISA at baseline, week 12 and 24 in order to evaluate the treatment response.
24 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Erythropoietin alfa

3
Subscribe