Local Anesthetic Response in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) and Healthy Volunteers

October 8, 2025 updated by: Satish R. Raj, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Local anesthetic resistance is commonly reported by patients with EDS. However, there are no objective data on the occurrence of local anesthetic resistance in EDS patients and in healthy volunteers. We propose to collect such objective data on the frequency of drug resistance and whether any problems with local anesthesia are due to initial ineffectiveness or due to its effects dissipating too soon.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There was a prior large online questionnaire to better understand the issues around local anesthetic resistance. By November 2018, 933 EDS patients (total 1059 respondents) completed the survey, 99.2% of which had previously received local anesthetics. Among these patients, 88% reported that they have "had a problem with local anesthetic injection not working adequately or properly," while only 54% of respondents without EDS reported a similar problem. These data suggests that local anesthetic resistance might be more prevalent in patients with EDS than in the general population. If these findings are true, then this might have significant implications for the appropriate management of these patients during minor surgery and dental procedures.

This study aims to assess the frequency and related issues around local anesthetic resistance in EDS patients, including whether the problem is a lack of analgesia or a timing effect (short duration of action or delayed onset of action), and whether the problem relates only to some local anesthetics or whether there is a problem with the whole class of local anesthetics.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

EDS patients and non-EDS participants

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • EDS patients, clinically diagnosed hypermobile EDS based on 2017 criteria
  • EDS patients with genetically proven non-hypermobile EDS
  • Healthy participants, no EDS
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to Lidocaine or Bupivacaine
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
EDS Patients
Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria (2017) for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • Saline
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
  • lignocaine
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • marcaine
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy control volunteers who do not meet the criteria for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • Saline
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
  • lignocaine
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • marcaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta Pain Scores Lidocaine at 5 min
Time Frame: 5 minutes post-injection
Difference between the pain score at the Lidocaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).
5 minutes post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta Pain Scores Lidocaine at 30 min
Time Frame: 30 min
Difference between the pain score at the Lidocaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).
30 min
Delta Pain Scores Bupivacaine at 5 min
Time Frame: 5 min
Difference between the pain score at the bupivacaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).
5 min
Delta Pain Scores Bupivacaine at 30 min
Time Frame: 30 min
Difference between the pain score at the bupivacaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).
30 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Satish R Raj, MD MSCI, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection

Subscribe