- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04043286
The Effects of Dis/Reconnection of Implant Abutments on Peri-implant Bone Levels
April 3, 2024 updated by: Loma Linda University
The Effects of Disconnection and Reconnection of Implant Abutments on Peri-implant Bone Levels: a 1-year Prospective Study
The aim of this prospective study is to assess the effects of definitive abutment connection at the time of implant placement on bone level changes in the areas of the posterior maxilla and mandible.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A total of 38 implants will be placed in 19 patients with at least 2 missing posterior teeth in the maxilla and the mandible for this study.
Definitive prefabricated abutments will be connected at implant placement.
The abutment (control group) on one of the two implants will be randomly selected to go through one complete cycle of complete disconnection and reconnection by hand at 16- (DR1), 19- (DR2), 22- (DR3), and 24- (DR4) weeks after implant surgery.
The abutment (test group) on the other implant will be left undisturbed throughout the duration of the study.
All implants will remain unrestored within the study period (12 months).
Peri-implant bone level changes will be assessed using standardized periapical radiographs immediately after implant placement (T0), at 3-(T3), 6-(T6) and 12-(T12) month follow-up examinations and during each disconnection of the abutments.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Sasiya Bhumpattarachai, DDS
- Phone Number: 909-328-9742
- Email: sbhumpattarachai@llu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
- Loma Linda University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimum age 18
- Good oral hygiene
- Healed site that possess two or more missing teeth in the maxillary or mandibular posterior region (excluding third molars)
- Adequate bone to accommodate at least a 4.3 mm diameter and 8mm length implant at each site
- Have at least 8mm interocclusal restorative space
- Willing to participate and attend the planned follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of alcohol/drug dependency, or any medical, physical, or psychological factor that might affect the surgical or prosthodontic procedures and follow-up examinations
- History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region
- History or current habit of smoking
- History or current habit of bruxism
- No opposing occluding dentition or prostheses
- Need for bone augmentation during implant placement
- Implant insertion torque value <35 Ncm
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control group
Healing abutments are connected on the implants on the day of surgery, which will be subjected to multiple disconnection and reconnection during the prosthetic phase
|
|
Experimental: Test group
Definitive abutments connected to the implants on the day of surgery.
No disconnection or reconnection during the prosthetic phase
|
With two height options available, On1 Base are selected depending on the thickness of the soft tissue.
It remains in position from implant placement to finalization, which leaves the soft tissue undisturbed for optimized healing, moved the restorative platform of Nobel Biocare conical connection implants from bone level to tissue level, thereby simplifying the restorative procedures
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in bone level between baseline surgery and 12 months
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to surgical implantation), and 12 months after surgical implantation
|
Bone level will be measured by periapical radiograph to assess for bone loss after dental implant
|
At baseline (prior to surgical implantation), and 12 months after surgical implantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Level of radiolucency after implant
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to surgical implantation), and 12 months after surgical implantation
|
A successful implant will be determined by the degree of radiolucency around the implant 12 months after surgery.
Radiolucency will be measured by periapical radiograph at baseline prior to surgery and at 12 months after dental implant surgery.
Normal degrees of radiolucency are within 2mm at the crestal region and no radiolucency around the body of the implant
|
At baseline (prior to surgical implantation), and 12 months after surgical implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joseph Kan, DDS, MS, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available.
- Berberi AN, Sabbagh JM, Aboushelib MN, Noujeim ZF, Salameh ZA. A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla. Front Physiol. 2014 Jan 31;5:29. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00029. eCollection 2014.
- Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Nov;62(5):567-72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90081-4.
- Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina RU, Oates TW, Schenk RK, Buser D, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2003 Mar;82(3):232-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200316.
- Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Sep;7(3):212-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070303.x.
- Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991 Apr-Jun;2(2):81-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x.
- Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Oct;23(10):971-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00520.x.
- Squier CA, Collins P. The relationship between soft tissue attachment, epithelial downgrowth and surface porosity. J Periodontal Res. 1981 Jul;16(4):434-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1981.tb00994.x. No abstract available.
- Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. The role of connective tissue in inhibiting epithelial downgrowth on titanium-coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992 Apr;26(4):493-515. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820260407.
- Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Mar;22(3):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00143.x.
- Rompen E. The impact of the type and configuration of abutments and their (repeated) removal on the attachment level and marginal bone. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5 Suppl:S83-90. Erratum In: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;5(4):379.
- Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Aug;24(8):568-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00230.x.
- Becker K, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Schwarz F. Impact of abutment material and dis-/re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01911.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Rodriguez X, Vela X, Mendez V, Segala M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Tarnow DP. The effect of abutment dis/reconnections on peri-implant bone resorption: a radiologic study of platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants placed in animals. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Mar;24(3):305-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02317.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
- Alves CC, Munoz F, Cantalapiedra A, Ramos I, Neves M, Blanco J. Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection--a dog model study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):983-91. doi: 10.1111/clr.12385. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
- Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1303-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02111.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
- Degidi M, Nardi D, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):794-805. doi: 10.1111/cid.12051. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
- Canullo L, Bignozzi I, Cocchetto R, Cristalli MP, Iannello G. Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Winter;3(4):285-96.
- Grandi T, Guazzi P, Samarani R, Garuti G. Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Spring;5(1):9-16.
- Grandi T, Guazzi P, Samarani R, Maghaireh H, Grandi G. One abutment-one time versus a provisional abutment in immediately loaded post-extractive single implants: a 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7(2):141-9.
- Molina A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Martin C, Blanco J, Sanz M. The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):443-452. doi: 10.1111/clr.12818. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
- Koutouzis T, Koutouzis G, Gadalla H, Neiva R. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):807-14. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3022.
- Luongo G, Bressan E, Grusovin MG, d'Avenia F, Neumann K, Sbricoli L, Esposito M. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):129-40.
- Iglhaut G, Schwarz F, Winter RR, Mihatovic I, Stimmelmayr M, Schliephake H. Epithelial attachment and downgrowth on dental implant abutments--a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Sep-Oct;26(5):324-31. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12097. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
- Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):712-9.
- Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Mar;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050101.x.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 30, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 16, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
September 16, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 31, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
August 2, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 5, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5190024
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bone Loss
-
Alexandria UniversityLehigh UniversityCompletedBone Loss | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone LossEgypt
-
Neva Electromagnetics, LLCMassachusetts General HospitalUnknownBone Loss, Age Related | Age-Related Bone Loss
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsEnrolling by invitationStability, Marginal Bone Loss and Occlusal Load Analysis of PEEK Abutment Supported on Short ImplantMarginal Bone Loss and Loss of Osteointegration of Short ImplantEgypt
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaMozo Grau Ticare ImplantsRecruitingPeri-implant Marginal Bone Loss | Peri-implant Bone Level | Transmucosal Abutment Design | Peri-implant Bone LossSpain
-
Dr. Soetomo General HospitalDr. Ramelan Naval Hospital; Airlangga University Hospital; Sidoarjo General Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
University of ValenciaJuan Carlos Bernabeu Mira; Miguel Peñarrocha DiagoCompleted
-
Worcester Polytechnic InstituteNorthwestern UniversityCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal HospitalUnknown
Clinical Trials on Definitive abutment
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridOral Reconstruction FoundationActive, not recruitingDental Implant | Prosthetic AbutmentSpain
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaActive, not recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Contamac LtdHartwig Research CenterCompleted
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaUniversidad de Murcia; University of Valencia; University of Salamanca; Health...Active, not recruitingDental Implant | Tooth Extraction | Tooth-loss | Teeth AbsentSpain
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMissing TeethSyrian Arab Republic
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoBioHorizons, Inc.Active, not recruitingDental Implant Failure NosUnited States
-
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to...RecruitingPartial-edentulismChina
-
Chiang Mai UniversityEnrolling by invitationPeri-implant Tissue Response With Use of Customized Healing AbutmentsThailand