- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03714074
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Trial design:
Randomized Controlled Trial., Parallel Design., Allocation ratio 1:1
This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient clinic in the Fixed Prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
First Visit: ( Diagnosis and records Making)
Patients will be recalled to the outpatient clinic, treatment will be discussed with the patient in details with the expected timeline and full duration of the treatment and a signed consent will be obtained from the patient.
Thorough medical history will be taken from the patient to identify any causes preventing the patient from undergoing the surgery and to eliminate any risk factors. Primary alginate impressions and bite registration will be made to obtain mounted study casts for case study, intra-oral photographs will be taken and the patient will be asked for a CBCT for the area of interest to be studied and discussed .
Second visit: (Implant insertion)
The patient will be locally anaesthetized using Articaine 4% (Septanest, France) , and patient will be left for 5 -10 minutes after which he/she will be examined for objective/subjective signs. If the patient shows any signs of pain or discomfort during examination, another carpule will be administrated.
A full thickness flap will be opened at the surgical site using #15 blade with a sub-crestal incision to expose the crest of the bone and two vertical releasing incisions. The flap will be reflected using a mucoperiosteal elevator. Sequential drilling will be performed according to the desired implant diameter using the drills provided by the surgical kit and the implant will be inserted manually into the osteotomy using the ratchet wrench and driver. The initial stability of the implant will be tested with the torque wrench and the implant opening will be closed using a cover screw. A peri-apical radiograph will be taken to confirm the implant position and assure it is away from vital structures by 2mm.
Flap will be repositioned using a tissue forceps and suturing will be done to secure the flap in position using a 4-0 silk suture material.
Patient will be given the post-operative instructions and hygiene measures and Augmentin 1gm / 12 hours for 7 days and analgesics ( Brufen 400 mg when needed)
Third visit: (Re-entry)
After three to four months, the patient will be recalled for the 2nd stage surgery and implant exposure. Peri-apical radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be taken. The patient will be anaesthetized and the implant will be exposed by a crestal incision using a #15 blade. The cover screw will be replaced with a healing collar which will be left for 2 weeks.
Fourth visit: (Impression making):
After 2 weeks the healing collar will be removed and the transfer copings will be placed for impression making, after setting the impression will be disinfected and send to the laboratory along with the implant replicas for fabrication of the abutments and the prosthesis. The healing collar is replaced till the next visit.
Fifth visit: ( Delivery of the final restoration)
The healing collar will be removed and the abutment and final restoration will be placed over the implant, a peri-apical radiographs will be taken to ensure tightening of the abutment screw and absence of any gaps. Patient will be given oral hygiene instructions
Relevant care/interventions that will be permitted or prohibited during the trial:
- Patients will receive antibiotics and pain killers after the implant insertion
- Patients will be educated with proper hygiene measures and motivated to keep good oral hygiene
- Patients will be advised to stop/ decrease the frequency of smoking to maximum one pack per day and will be prohibited from drinking alcohol.
Primary outcome:
Patients' satisfaction will be measured used the Visual analogue scale; a numerical scale from 0-10 with 0 being the lowest value (dis-satisfied) and 10 being the highest (highly satisfied). The patient will be asked to fill the VAS at time of crown delivery (0) , 3months, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcome: will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months
- Bleeding on Probing Visual Inspection combined with Plastic Periodontal Probe 2 Binary (Yes or No)
- Probing Depth Graduated periodontal probe 2 Millimeters (m.m)
- Plaque accumulation Visually 2 Binary (Yes & No)
Tertiary outcome:
Will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months using the standardized peri-apical radiographs and image super-imposition on the software to measure the difference in bony crest height.
Where 0= time of prosthesis delievery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients above 18 years old
- Patients able to read and sign the informed consent.
- Medically free patients or with controlled systemic condition.
- Missing tooth/teeth in the esthetic zone
- Minimum bucco-lingual bone width of 6mm, evaluated using CBCT.
- Good oral hygiene and favourable occlusion
- Cooperative and motivated Patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old
- Illiterate, unable of comprehending or signing the informed consent form
- Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. Diabetes or hypertension) or debilitated health condition
- Pregnancy
- Poor oral hygiene or unfavorable occlusion
- Uncooperative, not willing to return for follow up visits
- Insufficient bone quantity or quality for implant placement
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PEEK abutment
PEEK abutment restored with PEEK superstructure
|
Implants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Zirconia abutment
zirconia abutment restored with PEEK superstructure
|
Imolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change in Patients satisfaction: VAS
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) a numerical scale from 0 - 10 , 0 = not satisfied and 10 = highly satisfied
|
baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in bleeding in probing
Time Frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
inserting periodontal probe in gingival sulcus to detect bleeding (yes or no)depth (millimeters)
|
baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
|
Change in periodontal probing depth
Time Frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
inserting a graduated periodontal probe to detect presence or absence of pockets (yes or No)
|
baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
|
Change in Plaque accumilation
Time Frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
visual inspection for plaque accumilation (yes or No)
|
baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change in crestal bone resorption
Time Frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
in millimeters by superimposition of standerdized radiographs
|
baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Amina Zaki, Professor, Cairo university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD-CU-2018-09-27
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patients Satisfaction
-
University of VigoNot yet recruitingPatients | Cancer Survivors | NeoplamsSpain
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityCompletedPartially Edentulous PatientsSaudi Arabia
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownHigh Caries Risk Patients | Antimicrobial Effect | Salivary pH | Patient Satisfaction to Taste
-
University of BaselEnrolling by invitationClasp-retained Partial Dentures | Extracoronal Adhesive Attachment | Patients Satisfaction With Removable Dental ProsthesesSwitzerland
-
Akdeniz UniversityNot yet recruitingPostoperative Care | Pediatric Surgical PatientsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Università degli Studi dell'InsubriaCompletedPostoperative Complications | Postoperative Pain | Intraoperative Complications | Patients SatisfactionItaly
-
Hospital Sirio-LibanesNot yet recruitingHospitalized Patients | Intensive Care Unit-acquired Weakness | ICU HospitalizationBrazil
-
University Hospital of North NorwayActive, not recruitingSurvival of the Implants With Revision as Endpoint | Clinical Performance With HHS | Patients Satisfaction With the Hip ImplantNorway
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes; URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker CochinCompletedProfessionals and Patients in the Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationFrance
-
Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanWithdrawnCoronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
Clinical Trials on PEEK implant abutment
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
DR NUR HAFIZAH KAMAR AFFENDIRecruitingSoft Tissue Augmentation at Dental Implants | Peri-Implant Health | Peri-Implant TissuesMalaysia
-
NeodentActive, not recruitingJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyBrazil
-
University of ValenciaUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaActive, not recruitingPeri-implant Tissue Healing Assessed by Proteomic AnalysisSpain
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedImplant Therapy | Class II Extraction SocketsEgypt
-
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali...CompletedEdentulous Alveolar RidgeItaly
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Yi ZhouActive, not recruitingImplant Site ReactionChina
-
Misr International UniversityRecruiting