Effectiveness and Cost-utility of a Complex Intervention for Fibromyalgia Patients

Primary Care as a Promoter of the Quality of Life of Fibromyalgia Patients. Effectiveness and Cost-utility of a Complex Intervention Through a Randomized Clinical Trial

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disease characterized by chronic pain, fatigue and loss of function that leads to a significant deterioration in the quality of life. Despite controversies about the most appropriate treatment, studies indicate that a multidisciplinary treatment would be effective. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and cost-utility of a complex intervention in the quality of life (main variable), the functional impact, the mood and the pain of people with FM treated in the Primary Care Teams (PCTs) of the Catalan Institute of Health (CIH).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Methods and analysis: Mixed methodology study following the recommendations of the Medical Research Council, with two phases. Phase 1: Randomized pragmatic clinical trial with patients diagnosed with FM and assigned to one of the 11 PCTs of the CIH (Territorial management of "Terras del Ebro"). A total sample of 336 patients is estimated.

The usual clinical practice will be carried out in the control group and the usual practice and the complex treatment, in the intervention group. The complex treatment will be based on health education, aerobic physical exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy, during 12 weeks in sessions of 2 hours/week. Statistical analysis: Assessment of the standardized mean response and of the size of the standardized effect and multivariate logistic regression analysis will be performed. The economic analysis will be based on useful measures. Phase 2: Qualitative socio-constructivist study to identify the improvement aspects of the intervention according to the results obtained and the opinions and experiences of the participants (patients and professionals). The sampling will be theoretical with 2 discussion groups composed of participants in the intervention and 2 discussion groups of professionals from different PCTs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tarragona
      • Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain, 43500
        • Institut Català de la Salut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (all criteria must be met):

  • Have a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Have a fixed or mobile telephone
  • Voluntarily accept participation in the project

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active psychotic outbreak;
  • Intellectual deficiency;
  • Severe depression and personality disorder;
  • Self and hetero-aggressive behaviors;
  • Individual assessment of active consumption of psychoactive substances;
  • Incompatibility with the group's schedule.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: complex-treatment benefiting group
Participants in the intervention group will receive the complex treatment and the usual clinical practice.
The complex treatment will be based on health education, aerobic physical exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy, during 12 weeks in sessions of 2 hours/week. The sessions will be conducted in the primary health care by trained professionals.
No Intervention: complex-treatment no benefiting group
Participants in the control group will receive the care from the usual clinical practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in life quality
Time Frame: change from life quality at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study
to be evaluated with the health questionnaire (SF-36v2). It will be measured by a scale Likert: 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
change from life quality at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study
Change in functional impact of fibromyalgia
Time Frame: Change from functional impact of fibromyalgia at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
to be evaluated with the Revised Questionnaire on the Impact of Fibromyalgia (FIQR) It will be measured by a scale Likert: 0 (best) to 100 (worst).
Change from functional impact of fibromyalgia at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
Change in tender points
Time Frame: Change from tender points at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
Tender points evaluate the presence of pain in 18 areas of the body and will be measured by a scale Likert: 0 (best) to 18 (worst).
Change from tender points at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
Change in Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from VAS at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
The VAS evaluates the self-perceived intensity of pain by a scale Likert: 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Change from VAS at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
Change in mood indicator (anxiety)
Time Frame: Change from mood indicator (anxiety) at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
To be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. The scale likert punctuates from 0 to 21 (8 to 10 indicates a doubtful case of anxiety; more than 11 indicates a probable case of anxiety).
Change from mood indicator (anxiety) at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
Change in mood indicator (depression)
Time Frame: Change from mood indicator (depression) at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.
To be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. The scale likert punctuates from 0 to 21 (8 to 10 indicates a doubtful case of anxiety; more than 11 indicates a probable case of anxiety).
Change from mood indicator (depression) at 3, 9 and 15 months after the beginning of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
age, sex, level of education, work disability and family coexistence
baseline (pre intervention period)
Presence/absence of physical manifestations
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Physical manifestations to be evaluated: non-repairing sleep, excessive fatigue, dryness of mucous membranes, Raynaud's phenomenon, Intolerance to olfactory and auditory stimuli, cephalgia lumbar, increased sensitivity to the side effects of drugs and paresthesia of hands and feet. To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Presence/absence of physical or psychic trigger factor of fibromyalgia
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Presence/absence of physical, psychic or psychological factor responsible for fibromyalgia maintenance
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Presence/absence of family history of fibromyalgia
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
presence/absence of cognitive psychological symptoms: Difficulty for concentration, alteration of memory
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
presence/absence of comorbidities: Chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, irritable bladder syndrome, myofascial pain
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Diagnosis date
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
diagnosis date of fibromyalgia
baseline (pre intervention period)
Years of evolution
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
years of evolution of fibromyalgia
baseline (pre intervention period)
presence/absence of pathological history: arthrosis, arthritis and mental health problems
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
To be evaluated with a questionnaire (yes/no type)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Test of the thyroid stimulating hormone
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results in milliunits per litre (mUI/L)
baseline (pre intervention period)
Hemogram
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results of hemogram
baseline (pre intervention period)
Glucose, creatinine and C-reactive protein tests
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results of each test in mg/dl
baseline (pre intervention period)
Liver Function Tests
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results of each test
baseline (pre intervention period)
Globular sedimentation rate
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results in mm
baseline (pre intervention period)
Rheumatoid factor
Time Frame: baseline (pre intervention period)
Analytic results in IU/mL
baseline (pre intervention period)
Pharmacy billing cost
Time Frame: one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
antidepressants, analgesics and others
one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
Cost of visits
Time Frame: one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
cost of visits to family doctor or nurse and cost of urgency visits
one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
Cost of referrals
Time Frame: one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
cost of referrals to external consultations
one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
Cost of lost productivity
Time Frame: one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention
cost of lost productivity due to sick leave
one year before the beginning of the intervention in comparison with one year after the beginning of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Some individual participant data collected during the qualitative phase of the study, after deidentification, will be published in articles. Some articles were already published.

Grouped (not individual) participant data that underlie the quantitative results of the trial (and also qualitative results) will be published in text, tables, or figures. The quantitative results were not yet published.

Study protocols and patients' qualitative data of this project were already published.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available in the scientific publications derived from the project.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Through scientific publications in open access journals

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on complex treatment

3
Subscribe