Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU

September 25, 2025 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
The aim of this study is to reduce the suffering in intensive care through palliative care consultations.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This project investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of palliative care consultations in the Intensive care unit. Charité will implement the Working Package 2 "Europe-wide harmonized and recommended palliative care practice for ICU" of the approved HORIZON funding application EPIC, to which this ethics application refers.

An accompanying anonymous employee survey (doctors/nurses) is conducted once in the intervention phase and once in the control phase in all study centers (see secondary endpoints 57-68 and 71).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2040

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • ICU General Resuscitation (RES UP), General University hospital
      • Prague, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • ICU General Resuscitation (RES2)
      • Prague, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • ICU Metabolic, General University hospital
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • CARITAS Klinik Maria Heimsuchung
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hubertus
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CVK, Charité - University Berlin
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Charité - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Medical and Neurological Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Neurosurgical and Traumatological ICU ZI13, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Surgical Intensive Care Unit CIA1/CIB1, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
      • Halle, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale): Klinik für Innere Medizin III
      • Neuss, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Johanna-Etienne Hospital Neuss, Interdisciplinary ICU
      • Wittenberg, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Ev. Krankenhaus Paul-Gerhardt-Stift Wittenberg:Angiologie und Kardiologie
    • State of Berlin
      • Mitte, State of Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK),Charité - University Medicine Berlin
      • Wedding, State of Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK),Charité - University Medicine Berlin
      • Alexandroupoli, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis
      • Athens, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit of the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center
      • Athens, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital
      • Athens, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Evaggelismos General Hospital
      • Ioannina, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Ioannina
      • Larissa, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Larissa, Critical Care Department
    • Crete
      • Heraklion, Crete, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion
    • Rio
      • Pátrai, Rio, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • General Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Medical Organisation
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • The Coronary Care Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Hospital, Ein Kerem
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • The Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Hospital, Ein Kerem
      • Perugia, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • S.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 2 - Terapia Intensiva, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia
      • Perugia, Italy
        • Withdrawn
        • S.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 1 - Terapia Intensiva Cardiochirurgica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia
      • Salerno, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • UOC di Anestesia e Rianimazione Cardio Toraco Vascolare dell'AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Salerno University Hospital
      • Terni, Italy
        • Withdrawn
        • S.C. Anestesia - Rianimazione Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria - Terni

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in ICU who can give consent and those who can not (via their authorized representative or legal guardian, also possible with delayed consent)
  • From 18 years
  • The leading cause of critical illness is not cancer
  • New admission on the participating ICU > 72h
  • Assessment of the need for palliative care by the in-charge physi-cian of the ICU, because (1) there is a significant disagreement about ICU treatment or (2) because the physician considers ther-apy limitations for the patient or (3) the physician considers a benefit from specialized PC consultation for ICU physician, nurse, or patient or family.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient is moribund and is expected to die within the next 24h

Study cohort relatives:

Inclusion criteria:

- At least one relative(s) of a patient. This may or may not be the legal representative, depending on national legislation.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Refusal by the relative
  • Refusal of the patient to participate in the intervention study
  • <18 years of age

Cohort of employees:

Inclusion criteria

  • Employed on the ITS as a doctor/nurse
  • Employed in the clinical center as a member of the palliative care consultation service

Exclusion criterion Refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Intensive care unit patients in the intervention phase.

A complex intervention is carried out in the intensive care unit. This includes:

  • telemedical consultations by specialized palliative care experts from external institutions for the respective hospital staff
  • the training of hospital staff in the intensive care unit in basic palliative care and
  • the use of checklists for the early identification of eligible patients and the structured recording of palliative care needs.

The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the complex intervention will be investigated using a controlled clinical trial in a cluster-randomized controlled design. In addition, as part of the multicenter clinical study in WP 2 staff, patients and relatives will also be surveyed.

Active Comparator: Control
Intensive care unit patients with routine treatment in the control phase.
No complex intervention is established, just routine procedures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of intensive care stay
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days

The primary endpoint is the number of days the patient spent in each Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the index hospital during the first hospitalization.

For example, if the patient was transferred from the first ICU participating in the EPIC study to another, second ICU within the same hospital, or if the patient was transferred back from a ward to the first ICU, the duration of the secondary ICU is included in the calculation of the primary endpoint.

During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Costs
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Hospital cost and billing data, data on medical resource consumption combined with data on costs per unit of consumption at hospital level and from external sources, data on intervention costs including staff time for palliative care and related activities, hospital data or national data on salaries of individual professional groups.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Hospital data on salaries per occupational group
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Readmissions to intensive care unit
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
The readmission rate of patients transferred out of the Intensive care unit
During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Maximum Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score (SOFA Score) in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
To evaluate the performance of total maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and a derived measure, delta SOFA (total maximum SOFA score minus admission total SOFA) as a descriptor of multiple organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Palliative Care assessment
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of palliative care assessment performed during study period. The answer to the question: Has the palliative care assessment taken place? Yes/No
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms I
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Presence of refractory symptoms I is measured by physical symptoms.
During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Presence of refractory symptoms II
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms II is measured by distress of the patient.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms III
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms III is measured by distress of the family.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms IV
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence of refractory symptoms IV is measured by social problems of the patient.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Incidence of delirium
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Delirium is measured with validated delirium scores.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Presence and nature of treatment limitations
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Treatment limitation includes limits on the frequency of treatment, number of visits, days of coverage, or other similar limits on the scope or duration of treatment.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Length of hospital stay is measured from ICU admission to discharge from hospital in days.
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Informations on discharge
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Where the patient is discharged to.
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Specialized palliative care expert
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Presence of specialized palliative care expert consultation. Answer to the question: Was a specialized palliative care expert consulted? Yes/No Duration of measurement: Until hospital discharge
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to three months
Intensive care unit, inhouse, until 30 days and until 3 months
Up to three months
Social Status of the patient
Time Frame: Up to three months
The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status (MacArthur SSS Scale) is a single-item measure that assesses a person's perceived rank relative to others in their group: To score this measure, researchers simply note the number of the rung (1-10) on which the respondent placed their "X."
Up to three months
Place of stay after hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to three months
Place of stay after hospitalization is measured in questionnaire.
Up to three months
Home care after hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to three months
Home care after hospitalization is measured in days.
Up to three months
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care from the perspective of patients.
Up to three months
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care from the perspective of relatives.
Up to three months
Symptom management by intensive care staff I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Symptom management I by intensive care staff from the patient's perspective is measured with a questionnaire.
Up to three months
Symptom management by intensive care staff II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Symptom management II by intensive care staff from the relative's perspective is measured with a questionnaire.
Up to three months
Treatment evaluation II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Treatment evaluation II is measured from the relatives' (proxy's) perspective with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment I from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Satisfaction with regard to communication I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Satisfaction with regard to communication I from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Satisfaction with regard to communication II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Satisfaction with regard to communication II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Rating of the quality of information regarding the treatment II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Suitability of care from the patient's perspective
Time Frame: Up to three months
Suitability of care from the patient's perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Outpatient resource utilization
Time Frame: Up to three months
Outpatient resource utilization is measured by the number of outpatient visits.
Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources I is measured in days of mechanical ventilation.
Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources II is measured by Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Yes/No.
Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources III
Time Frame: Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources III is measured by dialysis Yes/No.
Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
Utilization of medical resources IV is measured by other organ replacement therapies. Yes/No.
Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital I
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital I is measured by number and days of re-hospitalizations in days.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital II is measured by days in care institutions in days.
Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital III
Time Frame: Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital III is measured by outpatient healthcare encounters in days.
Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital IV is measured by use of outpatient nursing services in days.
Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital V
Time Frame: Up to three months
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital V is measured by specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in days.
Up to three months
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 I
Time Frame: Up to three months
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) I measures anxiety and depression in patients. The PHQ-4 is a four questionnaire answered on a four point Likert-type scale. A score of 3 or more on the depression/anxiety subscale is positive.
Up to three months
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 II
Time Frame: Up to three months
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) II measures anxiety and depression in relatives. The PHQ-4 is a four questionnaire answered on a four point Likert-type scale. A score of 3 or more on the depression/anxiety subscale is positive.
Up to three months
Health related quality of life I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Health related quality of life I of the patient is measured with the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) from the EuroQol Group.
Up to three months
Question about the opinion of relatives on the unnecessary prolongation of life
Time Frame: Up to three months
Question about the opinion of relatives on the unnecessary prolongation of life is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
Up to three months
Question about opinion of relatives on discomfort during the final hours before death
Time Frame: Up to three months
Question about opinion of relatives on discomfort during the final hours before death is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
Up to three months
Question about opinion of relatives on loneliness during dying process.
Time Frame: Up to three months
Question about opinion of relatives on loneliness during dying process is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
Up to three months
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care I assessed by patients, measured with Likert scale/NRS 0-10).
Up to three months
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care II assessed by relatives, measured by by Likert scale (too little, just right, too much)/NRS (0-10).
Up to three months
Informal care by relatives I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Informal care by relatives I is measured by time spent with the patient.
Up to three months
Informal care by relatives II
Time Frame: Up to three months
Informal care by relatives II is measured by impact on relative's income.
Up to three months
Informal care by relatives III
Time Frame: Up to three months
Informal care by relatives III is measured by giving up relative´s professional activity.
Up to three months
Informal care by relatives IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
Informal care by relatives IV is measured by reducing relative's professional activity.
Up to three months
Inappropriate therapy
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Perception of inappropriate therapy per employee based on 5 questions to employees is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Ethical decision-making climate in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Ethical decision-making climate in the intensive care unit per employee is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Stress thermometer
Time Frame: Up to three months
To measure psychological distress the German version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer is used. The scale ranges from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress) with a cutoff score of 5, indicating a clinically significant level of distress.
Up to three months
Treatment evaluation I
Time Frame: Up to three months
Treatment evaluation I is measured from patients' perspective with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
Up to three months
Informations on discharge
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Where the patient is discharged to.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12)
Time Frame: Up to 34 months.
Twelve questions from the BAT-12 per employee based on 5 questions is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months.
Moral distress
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Moral distress per employee is measured with numeric rating scale once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Implementation of the end-of-life practice
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Questions on the current implementation of the end-of-life practice based on 12 questions that are still being developed is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Questions on the existence of Standard Operating Procedures
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Existence of Standard Operating Procedures per employee is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Questions about using the ABCDEF bundle
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Questions about using the ABCDEF bundle is measured with 11 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Questions about supporting measures
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Questions about supporting measures is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Perception of palliative care and law
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Perception of palliative care and law is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Question about hurdles to palliative care
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Question about hurdles to palliative care in the intensive care medicine is measured with 1 question with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Question about supporting factors
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Question about supporting factors to palliative care in the intensive care medicine is measured with 1 question with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months
Comments after beginning of the intervention phase
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Comments can be made via free text in an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic data of the patients
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Demographic data of the patient (age, gender, main diagnosis and reasons for intensive care, insurance status, religion yes/no, highest level of education, employment status, existence of living will, patient power of attorney, chronic conditions) are measured with a questionnaire.
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
Demographic data of the relatives
Time Frame: Up to three months
Demographic data of the relative (age, gender, relationship to the patient, representative/guardian, religion yes/no) are measured with a questionnaire.
Up to three months
Employee demographics
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
Employee demographics (age group, gender, profession, years of professional experience, years and experience in palliative care and/or ethical training, type of intensive care unit) are measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
Up to 34 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Claudia Spies, MD, Prof., Charité-University Medicine (Berlin, Germany)
  • Study Director: Martin Neukirchen, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Study Director: Jochen Dutzmann, MD, University Medicine Halle, Germany
  • Study Director: Spyros Mentzelopoulos, MD, Prof., National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
  • Study Director: Katerina Rusinova, MD, Charles University in Prague, Italy
  • Study Director: Edoardo de Robertis, MD, Prof., University Of Perugia
  • Study Director: Akiva Nachshon, MD, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EPIC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Palliative Care

Clinical Trials on Complex intervention

Subscribe