- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06605079
Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This project investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of palliative care consultations in the Intensive care unit. Charité will implement the Working Package 2 "Europe-wide harmonized and recommended palliative care practice for ICU" of the approved HORIZON funding application EPIC, to which this ethics application refers.
An accompanying anonymous employee survey (doctors/nurses) is conducted once in the intervention phase and once in the control phase in all study centers (see secondary endpoints 57-68 and 71).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Claudia Spies, MD, Prof.
- Phone Number: +4930450551102
- Email: claudia.spies@charite.de
Study Locations
-
-
-
Prague, Czechia
- Recruiting
- ICU General Resuscitation (RES UP), General University hospital
-
Prague, Czechia
- Recruiting
- ICU General Resuscitation (RES2)
-
Prague, Czechia
- Recruiting
- ICU Metabolic, General University hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- CARITAS Klinik Maria Heimsuchung
-
Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hubertus
-
Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CVK, Charité - University Berlin
-
Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Charité - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF
-
Berlin, Germany
- Withdrawn
- Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
-
Düsseldorf, Germany
- Recruiting
- Medical and Neurological Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
-
Düsseldorf, Germany
- Recruiting
- Neurosurgical and Traumatological ICU ZI13, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
-
Düsseldorf, Germany
- Recruiting
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit CIA1/CIB1, University Hospital of Düsseldorf
-
Halle, Germany
- Recruiting
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale): Klinik für Innere Medizin III
-
Neuss, Germany
- Recruiting
- Johanna-Etienne Hospital Neuss, Interdisciplinary ICU
-
Wittenberg, Germany
- Withdrawn
- Ev. Krankenhaus Paul-Gerhardt-Stift Wittenberg:Angiologie und Kardiologie
-
-
State of Berlin
-
Mitte, State of Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK),Charité - University Medicine Berlin
-
Wedding, State of Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK),Charité - University Medicine Berlin
-
-
-
-
-
Alexandroupoli, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis
-
Athens, Greece
- Recruiting
- Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit of the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center
-
Athens, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital
-
Athens, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Evaggelismos General Hospital
-
Ioannina, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Ioannina
-
Larissa, Greece
- Recruiting
- University Hospital of Larissa, Critical Care Department
-
-
Crete
-
Heraklion, Crete, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion
-
-
Rio
-
Pátrai, Rio, Greece
- Recruiting
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras
-
-
-
-
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Recruiting
- General Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Medical Organisation
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Recruiting
- The Coronary Care Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Hospital, Ein Kerem
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Recruiting
- The Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Hospital, Ein Kerem
-
-
-
-
-
Perugia, Italy
- Recruiting
- S.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 2 - Terapia Intensiva, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia
-
Perugia, Italy
- Withdrawn
- S.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 1 - Terapia Intensiva Cardiochirurgica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia
-
Salerno, Italy
- Recruiting
- UOC di Anestesia e Rianimazione Cardio Toraco Vascolare dell'AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Salerno University Hospital
-
Terni, Italy
- Withdrawn
- S.C. Anestesia - Rianimazione Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria - Terni
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Patients:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients in ICU who can give consent and those who can not (via their authorized representative or legal guardian, also possible with delayed consent)
- From 18 years
- The leading cause of critical illness is not cancer
- New admission on the participating ICU > 72h
- Assessment of the need for palliative care by the in-charge physi-cian of the ICU, because (1) there is a significant disagreement about ICU treatment or (2) because the physician considers ther-apy limitations for the patient or (3) the physician considers a benefit from specialized PC consultation for ICU physician, nurse, or patient or family.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is moribund and is expected to die within the next 24h
Study cohort relatives:
Inclusion criteria:
- At least one relative(s) of a patient. This may or may not be the legal representative, depending on national legislation.
Exclusion criteria:
- Refusal by the relative
- Refusal of the patient to participate in the intervention study
- <18 years of age
Cohort of employees:
Inclusion criteria
- Employed on the ITS as a doctor/nurse
- Employed in the clinical center as a member of the palliative care consultation service
Exclusion criterion Refusal to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Intensive care unit patients in the intervention phase.
|
A complex intervention is carried out in the intensive care unit. This includes:
The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the complex intervention will be investigated using a controlled clinical trial in a cluster-randomized controlled design. In addition, as part of the multicenter clinical study in WP 2 staff, patients and relatives will also be surveyed. |
|
Active Comparator: Control
Intensive care unit patients with routine treatment in the control phase.
|
No complex intervention is established, just routine procedures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of intensive care stay
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
The primary endpoint is the number of days the patient spent in each Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the index hospital during the first hospitalization. For example, if the patient was transferred from the first ICU participating in the EPIC study to another, second ICU within the same hospital, or if the patient was transferred back from a ward to the first ICU, the duration of the secondary ICU is included in the calculation of the primary endpoint. |
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Costs
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Hospital cost and billing data, data on medical resource consumption combined with data on costs per unit of consumption at hospital level and from external sources, data on intervention costs including staff time for palliative care and related activities, hospital data or national data on salaries of individual professional groups.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Hospital data on salaries per occupational group
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Readmissions to intensive care unit
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
|
The readmission rate of patients transferred out of the Intensive care unit
|
During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
|
|
Maximum Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score (SOFA Score) in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
To evaluate the performance of total maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and a derived measure, delta SOFA (total maximum SOFA score minus admission total SOFA) as a descriptor of multiple organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Palliative Care assessment
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Presence of palliative care assessment performed during study period.
The answer to the question: Has the palliative care assessment taken place?
Yes/No
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Presence of refractory symptoms I
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
|
Presence of refractory symptoms I is measured by physical symptoms.
|
During hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
|
|
Presence of refractory symptoms II
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Presence of refractory symptoms II is measured by distress of the patient.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Presence of refractory symptoms III
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Presence of refractory symptoms III is measured by distress of the family.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Presence of refractory symptoms IV
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Presence of refractory symptoms IV is measured by social problems of the patient.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Incidence of delirium
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Delirium is measured with validated delirium scores.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Presence and nature of treatment limitations
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Treatment limitation includes limits on the frequency of treatment, number of visits, days of coverage, or other similar limits on the scope or duration of treatment.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
Length of hospital stay is measured from ICU admission to discharge from hospital in days.
|
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
|
Informations on discharge
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
Where the patient is discharged to.
|
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
|
Specialized palliative care expert
Time Frame: During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
Presence of specialized palliative care expert consultation.
Answer to the question: Was a specialized palliative care expert consulted?
Yes/No Duration of measurement: Until hospital discharge
|
During hospital stay, an average of 8 days
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Intensive care unit, inhouse, until 30 days and until 3 months
|
Up to three months
|
|
Social Status of the patient
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status (MacArthur SSS Scale) is a single-item measure that assesses a person's perceived rank relative to others in their group: To score this measure, researchers simply note the number of the rung (1-10) on which the respondent placed their "X."
|
Up to three months
|
|
Place of stay after hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Place of stay after hospitalization is measured in questionnaire.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Home care after hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Home care after hospitalization is measured in days.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care from the perspective of patients.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Facilitators and barriers to high quality palliative care from the perspective of relatives.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Symptom management by intensive care staff I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Symptom management I by intensive care staff from the patient's perspective is measured with a questionnaire.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Symptom management by intensive care staff II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Symptom management II by intensive care staff from the relative's perspective is measured with a questionnaire.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Treatment evaluation II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Treatment evaluation II is measured from the relatives' (proxy's) perspective with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment I from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Evaluation of the provider's question about goals for treatment II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Satisfaction with regard to communication I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Satisfaction with regard to communication I from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Satisfaction with regard to communication II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Satisfaction with regard to communication II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment from the patients' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Evaluation of the quality of information regarding the treatment II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Rating of the quality of information regarding the treatment II from the relatives' perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Suitability of care from the patient's perspective
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Suitability of care from the patient's perspective is measured with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Outpatient resource utilization
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Outpatient resource utilization is measured by the number of outpatient visits.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Utilization of medical resources I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Utilization of medical resources I is measured in days of mechanical ventilation.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Utilization of medical resources II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Utilization of medical resources II is measured by Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Yes/No.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Utilization of medical resources III
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Utilization of medical resources III is measured by dialysis Yes/No.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Utilization of medical resources IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Utilization of medical resources IV is measured by other organ replacement therapies.
Yes/No.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital I
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital I is measured by number and days of re-hospitalizations in days.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital II is measured by days in care institutions in days.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital III
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital III is measured by outpatient healthcare encounters in days.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital IV is measured by use of outpatient nursing services in days.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital V
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Medical utilization after discharge from hospital V is measured by specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in days.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) I measures anxiety and depression in patients.
The PHQ-4 is a four questionnaire answered on a four point Likert-type scale.
A score of 3 or more on the depression/anxiety subscale is positive.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-4 II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) II measures anxiety and depression in relatives.
The PHQ-4 is a four questionnaire answered on a four point Likert-type scale.
A score of 3 or more on the depression/anxiety subscale is positive.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Health related quality of life I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Health related quality of life I of the patient is measured with the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) from the EuroQol Group.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Question about the opinion of relatives on the unnecessary prolongation of life
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Question about the opinion of relatives on the unnecessary prolongation of life is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Question about opinion of relatives on discomfort during the final hours before death
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Question about opinion of relatives on discomfort during the final hours before death is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Question about opinion of relatives on loneliness during dying process.
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Question about opinion of relatives on loneliness during dying process is measured by bipolar Likert scale.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care I assessed by patients, measured with Likert scale/NRS 0-10).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Patient and family friendliness of intensive care unit care II assessed by relatives, measured by by Likert scale (too little, just right, too much)/NRS (0-10).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Informal care by relatives I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Informal care by relatives I is measured by time spent with the patient.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Informal care by relatives II
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Informal care by relatives II is measured by impact on relative's income.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Informal care by relatives III
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Informal care by relatives III is measured by giving up relative´s professional activity.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Informal care by relatives IV
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Informal care by relatives IV is measured by reducing relative's professional activity.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Inappropriate therapy
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Perception of inappropriate therapy per employee based on 5 questions to employees is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Ethical decision-making climate in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Ethical decision-making climate in the intensive care unit per employee is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Stress thermometer
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
To measure psychological distress the German version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer is used.
The scale ranges from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress) with a cutoff score of 5, indicating a clinically significant level of distress.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Treatment evaluation I
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Treatment evaluation I is measured from patients' perspective with a 5-point Likert scale (The choices range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
|
Up to three months
|
|
Informations on discharge
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Where the patient is discharged to.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12)
Time Frame: Up to 34 months.
|
Twelve questions from the BAT-12 per employee based on 5 questions is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months.
|
|
Moral distress
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Moral distress per employee is measured with numeric rating scale once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Implementation of the end-of-life practice
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Questions on the current implementation of the end-of-life practice based on 12 questions that are still being developed is measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Questions on the existence of Standard Operating Procedures
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Existence of Standard Operating Procedures per employee is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Questions about using the ABCDEF bundle
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Questions about using the ABCDEF bundle is measured with 11 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Questions about supporting measures
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Questions about supporting measures is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Perception of palliative care and law
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Perception of palliative care and law is measured with 4 questions with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Question about hurdles to palliative care
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Question about hurdles to palliative care in the intensive care medicine is measured with 1 question with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Question about supporting factors
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Question about supporting factors to palliative care in the intensive care medicine is measured with 1 question with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
|
Comments after beginning of the intervention phase
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Comments can be made via free text in an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Demographic data of the patients
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
Demographic data of the patient (age, gender, main diagnosis and reasons for intensive care, insurance status, religion yes/no, highest level of education, employment status, existence of living will, patient power of attorney, chronic conditions) are measured with a questionnaire.
|
During intensive care unit stay, an average of 5 days
|
|
Demographic data of the relatives
Time Frame: Up to three months
|
Demographic data of the relative (age, gender, relationship to the patient, representative/guardian, religion yes/no) are measured with a questionnaire.
|
Up to three months
|
|
Employee demographics
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
|
Employee demographics (age group, gender, profession, years of professional experience, years and experience in palliative care and/or ethical training, type of intensive care unit) are measured with an electronic questionnaire once per intervention and once per control period.
|
Up to 34 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Claudia Spies, MD, Prof., Charité-University Medicine (Berlin, Germany)
- Study Director: Martin Neukirchen, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
- Study Director: Jochen Dutzmann, MD, University Medicine Halle, Germany
- Study Director: Spyros Mentzelopoulos, MD, Prof., National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
- Study Director: Katerina Rusinova, MD, Charles University in Prague, Italy
- Study Director: Edoardo de Robertis, MD, Prof., University Of Perugia
- Study Director: Akiva Nachshon, MD, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- EPIC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Palliative Care
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedPalliative Care | Palliative Medicine | Hospice and Palliative Care NursingItaly
-
University Medical Center GoettingenRecruitingPalliative Care | Palliative Care, Patient Care | Oral Health Care | Oral Health-Related Quality of LifeGermany
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPalliative Care | Transitional CareUnited States
-
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation...Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine - St. Mary's Hospital University of...Enrolling by invitationPalliative Care | Supportive CareUnited Kingdom
-
McMaster UniversityUnknownPalliative Care | Satisfaction | Primary CareCanada
-
Bandırma Onyedi Eylül UniversityEge UniversityRecruitingPalliative CareTurkey
-
Cudeca Hospice FoundationLa Caixa FoundationRecruiting
-
Fordham UniversityCalvary Hospital, Bronx, NYNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation...University Hospitals, LeicesterCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier William Morey - Chalon sur SaôneCompleted
Clinical Trials on Complex intervention
-
Anne Estrup OlesenAalborg University; University College of Northern Denmark; Aalborg KommuneCompletedPatient Safety | Medication SafetyDenmark
-
Pakistan Institute of Living and LearningUniversity of Manchester; Dow University of Health SciencesCompletedDepression, Postpartum | Postnatal DepressionPakistan
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; University... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery HospitalNot yet recruitingA Trial of Behavioral Intervention on Prognostic Survival of Patients With Unresectable Liver CancerPrimary Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Unresectable Liver CancerChina
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityCompleted
-
Goethe UniversityMaastricht University Medical Center; German Federal Ministry of Education... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Seton Healthcare FamilyUniversity of Texas at AustinCompletedQuality of Life | Chronic Disease | Chronic IllnessUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHypertension | Cardiovascular Disease RiskUnited States
-
Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteLa Trobe UniversityCompleted
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfUniversity Hospital, Essen; University Hospital Muenster; University of Cologne; University Hospital, Bonn and other collaboratorsRecruiting