Achilles Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab

August 7, 2019 updated by: Toufic R. Jildeh, Henry Ford Health System

Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab Following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgically repaired tendon of a ruptured achilles tendon. We will investigate fixation slippage and tendon creep and correlate how these post-repair findings can contribute to outcomes of tendon repairs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

pture of the Achilles tendon is a relatively common injury among athletes involved in sports which require rapid direction changes and accelerations, such as soccer, sprinting, and basketball. Approximately 80% of ruptures occur during recreational sports, but it can also occur in sedentary individuals. An increase in recreational sport involvement has coincided with an increase in Achilles tendon ruptures. The most common age group for this injury is between 30 and 40 years old, and it is more likely to occur in males. It is thought that rupture in this age group is highest due to the co-occurrence of competitive sports and age- related degenerative changes.

Tendons changes occur as we age. There is decreased collagen density and fewer cross links, which alters the integrity of the tendon and its sheath. These changes, in addition to repetitive microtrauma, can cause the Achilles tendon to become calcified and thickened. Alteration in the elasticity of the tendon can set the stage for a rupture during abrupt increases in training intensity or during competitions.

The Achilles tendon is the largest tendon in the body, and it receives its blood supply from the gastroc- soleus complex. The blood supply is weakest between 2cm and 6cm from the tendon's insertion on the calcaneus, which is also the region where it is most likely to rupture.

The current recommendation for acute Achilles rupture is surgical repair, but there is no consensus regarding surgical versus nonsurgical treatment (immobilization, rehab, etc.). Surgical repair is thought to reduce the rates of re-rupture but also cause an increased risk of complications. There does not appear to be a difference in pre-injury activity levels between the two methods.

Tendons have excellent healing potential when the torn ends are reasonably approximated. Optimal tendon healing depends on surgical apposition and mechanical stabilization of the tendon ends. Once a tendon has been repaired, the suture material holds the tendon ends together, allowing fibroblasts to produce sufficient amounts of collagen to form a tendon callus.

In contrast with approximated tears, neglected ruptures with retraction of the proximal portion of the tendon heal with scar tissue, resulting in a lengthened, weakened musculotendinous unit. Poor muscle function will result without restoration of normal tendon length. Studies of tendon healing have indicated that early controlled motion and tensile stress applied to a repaired tendon promote earlier organization and remodeling of collagen fibers, decreased scar tissue, and increased strength compared with tendon immobilization.

Previous studies involving Rotator cuff repairs and ACL ligament reconstructions have employed the use of Tantalum Beads and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis to evaluate the creep or stretch of repaired soft tissue. These studies show that there appears to be soft tissue stretch/creep that occurs as tendon and ligament repairs/reconstructions heal. A surgeon's knowledge of how a repaired soft tissue will deform or stretch will be an undoubted asset to patient care and management. This knowledge will be invaluable for the surgeon in regards to appropriately preparing a tendon for repair, directly repairing the tendon and appropriately tensioning of the repair. It will also give valuable information for rehabilitation protocols and activity limitations post-operatively.

The safety of tantalum material has well been described in the orthopaedic literature. It is currently used in implants ranging from cervical spinal fusions to femoral rods without side effects.

Recently a prospective study looking at creep in rupture biceps tendons has been completed our institution. This study will use stereophotogrammetric analysis to expand our investigations to include Achilles tendon.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Health Ford Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with an acute tendon rupture less than 6 weeks were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Underwent any additional concomitant procedures or tendon transfers, sustained prior ruptures, or had a chronic rupture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Early Rehabiliation
6 weeks of non-weight bearing in addition to basic stretching exercises.
Patients will be undergoing achilles tendon repair
Active Comparator: Accelerated Rehabilitation
Patients will be non-weight bearing for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks patients were transitioned to a boot with two heel wedges and were weight bearing as tolerated. At 4 weeks, patients were transitioned to one wedge, and at 6 weeks patients were weight bearing as tolerated in a flat shoe. Each heel wedge was ¾ inch tall. After 6 weeks, patient's in both groups underwent identical rehab regimens per protocol
Patients will be undergoing achilles tendon repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repair site lengthening
Time Frame: 2 years
Intratendinous and repair site lengthening were determined
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score
Time Frame: 2 years
measure symptoms and physical activity levels after being treated for a complete Achilles tendon rupture
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 37283847

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Achilles Tendon Rupture

Clinical Trials on Achilles tendon repair

3
Subscribe