Could Conservative Treatment Become the New Gold Standard in Achilles Tendon Ruptures?

December 16, 2025 updated by: Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Could Conservative Treatment Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to compare conservative and surgical treatments for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to either a conservative rehabilitation protocol or open surgical repair. Functional outcomes were evaluated using isokinetic muscle strength testing and clinical scoring systems such as the ATRS, AOFAS, FADI, VAS, and Leppilahti scores.

The results showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of strength, tendon length, or clinical outcomes. Rerupture rates were similar, while wound complications occurred only in the surgical group.

The findings suggest that conservative treatment combined with early functional rehabilitation can provide outcomes comparable to surgery, with fewer complications. Conservative treatment may be a safe and effective alternative for managing acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Achilles tendon rupture is a common sports-related injury, and the optimal treatment approach remains controversial. Surgical repair has traditionally been considered the gold standard due to lower rerupture rates and better restoration of tendon continuity. However, surgery carries risks such as wound infection, nerve injury, and postoperative complications.

Recent advances in rehabilitation techniques have led to renewed interest in conservative management, which allows for early mobilization and functional recovery without surgical risks. This study was designed as a prospective, randomized clinical trial to objectively compare conservative and surgical treatments for acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Forty-four patients were randomly allocated to either a conservative treatment protocol based on the GAPNOT early functional rehabilitation model or open surgical repair using the Krackow suture technique. Functional recovery was assessed using isokinetic muscle testing for plantar flexion and dorsiflexion strength, as well as validated clinical scoring systems (ATRS, AOFAS, FADI, VAS, and Leppilahti).

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether conservative treatment can achieve comparable functional and biomechanical outcomes to surgical repair while minimizing complications. The results are expected to contribute to establishing evidence-based treatment guidelines and may support conservative management as a new gold standard in selected patient populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Haseki Training and Research Hospital
      • Istanbul, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Turkey (Türkiye), 34265
        • Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-50 years
  • Acute complete Achilles tendon rupture (tendon-to-tendon)
  • Injury occurred within 3 weeks prior to presentation
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the functional rehabilitation program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injury occurred more than 3 weeks prior to presentation
  • Open Achilles tendon rupture
  • History of preexisting foot or ankle pathology
  • Musculotendinous, insertional, or calcaneal avulsion-type Achilles tendon injuries
  • Presence of additional risk factors increasing Achilles tendon injury risk (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive therapy, fluoroquinolone use, or systemic corticosteroid use)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conservative Treatment
Participants follow the GAPNOT functional rehabilitation protocol, including initial immobilization in plantar flexion, gradual partial to full weight-bearing, and supervised physiotherapy to improve plantar flexion strength and ankle range of motion.
Participants follow the GAPNOT functional rehabilitation protocol. Initially immobilized in maximum plantar flexion with non-weight-bearing. At 2 weeks partial weight-bearing is allowed with an Achilles boot and heel lifts; by weeks 4-6 weight-bearing is increased and supervised physiotherapy is initiated focusing on plantar flexion strength, calf strengthening and ankle range of motion. Outcomes assessed at 12-18 months by isokinetic testing and clinical scores.
Active Comparator: Surgical Repair
Open end-to-end Achilles tendon repair using the locked Krackow suture technique, followed by epitendinous augmentation and standardized early functional rehabilitation including gradual weight-bearing and physiotherapy.
Participants undergo open end-to-end Achilles tendon repair using the locked Krackow suture technique with 2-0 FiberWire and epitendinous augmentation. Postoperatively, standardized early functional rehabilitation is applied including gradual weight-bearing, ankle mobilization and physiotherapy focused on plantar flexion strength and ROM. Outcomes assessed at 12-18 months by isokinetic testing and clinical scores.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Plantar Flexion Torque
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Peak plantar flexion torque (Newton-meters, Nm) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity.
12-18 months post-injury
Total Work During Plantar Flexion
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Total work during plantar flexion (Joules) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity.
12-18 months post-injury
Initial Plantar Flexion Torque
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Initial plantar flexion torque (Newton-meters, Nm) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity
12-18 months post-injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA)
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Achilles tendon resting angle (degrees) measured using a standardized clinical goniometric method.
12-18 months post-injury
Pain Intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), reported on a 0-10 scale
12-18 months post-injury
Leppilahti Achilles tendon rupture score
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Leppilahti Achilles tendon rupture score (points) measured using the standardized Leppilahti scoring system.
12-18 months post-injury
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score (points) measured using the standardized AOFAS scoring system
12-18 months post-injury
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Foot and ankle function measured using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), reported as a numerical score (points)
12-18 months post-injury
Rerupture Rate
Time Frame: 12-18 months post-injury
Achilles tendon rerupture determined by clinical examination and/or imaging confirmation and recorded as the number of participants experiencing rerupture.
12-18 months post-injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The decision is based on patient confidentiality, ethical considerations, and the study's informed consent process, which did not include provisions for data sharing with external researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

Clinical Trials on Conservative treatment

Subscribe