Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin

August 9, 2019 updated by: Amr Khaled Mostafa, Cairo University

The Efficacy Of A Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant As Compared To A Conventional Resin Regarding Its Retention, Marginal Integrity And Prevention Of Lesion Progression. A Randomized Clinical Study

The aim of this study is to investigate the retention, marginal integrity and potential to prevent lesion progression of a bioactive resin material compared to a conventional resin-based flowable composite during management of initial carious lesion in adult population over an 18 months period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bio-active resin materials aim to possess the mechanical properties of resin materials in terms of higher wear resistance and dimensional stability over time. They also aim to mimic the biological activity of glass ionomers in terms of ion recharge and release. These new bio-active resin materials, with their lower particle size and better adaptability and polishability, might offer a substantial addition as fissure sealants if they fulfil the requisities satisfactory mechanical properties of resins and of ion recharge and release of glass ionomers.

The study will be conducted on demineralized fissures of permanent molars by application of a newly introduced giomer in one group while the other group will recieve a conventional resin material where they will be assessed for retention, marginal integrity and caries progression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with good oral hygiene
  • Co-operative patients with initially demineralized fissures in permanent molars of the maxilla or mandible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical Problems or Pregnancy
  • Lack of patient's approval and compliance
  • Presence of abnormal oral, medical, or mental condition
  • Known allergy of resin-based materials
  • Previous placements of sealants or restorations
  • Bruxism or mal-occlusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bioactive resin (Giomer)
This group of patients will receive a bioactive resin "Beautifil flow plus X (Shofu Dental)" for treatment of their demineralized fissures
The materials will be applied to the demineralized fissures as stated in manufacturer's instructions
Experimental: Conventional resin
This group of patients will receive a conventional resin "Filtek Z350xt Flowable composite (3M ESPE)" for treatment of their demineralized fissures
The materials will be applied to the demineralized fissures as stated in manufacturer's instructions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: 18 months
The sealing materials will be assessed for complete, partial or no retention. The assessment will be carried out by visual and tactile assessments and calculated as a percentage of the total sample.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal integrity
Time Frame: 18 months
The materials margins will be assessed for their marginal seal using FDI criteria using a WHO probe. Scoring will be made from 1-5 by FDI criteria then statistically analyzed
18 months
Caries progression
Time Frame: 18 months
The demineralized fissures will be monitored for caries arrest or progression. The assessment will be made by ICDAS II criteria comparing the scores from baseline.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 812014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The data will be assessed collectively for ll participants and statistically analyzed and published with the results. Other data can be provided apon request if ethically approved.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Demineralization, Tooth

Clinical Trials on Fissure sealing

3
Subscribe