Optimal Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in TIA (ODEA-TIA)

February 19, 2020 updated by: Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus

Optimal Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Transient Ischemic Attack

Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a common neurologic emergency. Although the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) has identical consequences for preventive therapy in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA, the management setting and diagnostic pathways frequently differ substantially between both manifestations. Despite these differences between stroke and TIA patients, previous studies have investigated diagnostic work-up for AF primarily in stroke patients. Thus, there is no common practice or "gold standard" of rhythm monitoring for TIA patients in most healthcare systems and the optimal method and duration of cardiac monitoring for TIA patients is currently unknown. This is likely to result in a substantial under-diagnosis of AF in TIA patients, failure to initiate appropriate secondary preventive medication (i.e. anticoagulation) and ultimately the occurrence of many otherwise preventable strokes.

The primary research question of the trial is whether prolonged ECG recording (intervention) significantly increases the rate of detection of paroxysmal AF compared to 24 h electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring (control) 6 months after start of monitoring in patients with recent TIA. The co-primary question of the trial is whether 28 d non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring is non-inferior to ECG recording using an implanted event recorder for AF detection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) are a common neurologic emergency. Clinical management guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for TIA patients suffering from atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, a diagnosis of AF in TIA patients has a major impact on the choice of adequate secondary stroke prevention. However, detection of paroxysmal AF in patients with TIA can be challenging. AF remains undetected in a relevant proportion of stroke and TIA patients using current routine diagnostic procedures. The actual prevalence of AF in TIA patients is unknown.

Although the detection of AF has identical consequences for preventive therapy in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA, the management setting and diagnostic pathways frequently differ substantially between both manifestations. So far, only limited data exist on AF detection after TIA specifically, and the best method for diagnosis of AF has not been established. The usefulness of prolonged rhythm monitoring using event recorders or non-invasive continuous ECG in TIA patients has not been determined. While the use of an AF detection tool in TIA patients is desirable, an adequate use of resources of AF detection technologies in unselected TIA patients may be needed for this large scale health care problem. Identifying TIA patients that are at increased risk of suffering from AF using clinical and blood-based biomarkers and therefore most likely to benefit from such diagnostic procedures would be useful.

The primary research question of the trial is whether prolonged ECG recording (intervention) significantly increases the rate of detection of pAF compared to 24 h ECG monitoring (control) 6 months after start of monitoring in patients with recent TIA. The co-primary question of the trial is whether 28 d non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring is non-inferior to ECG recording using an implanted event recorder for AF detection.

The ODEA-TIA trial is an investigator initiated prospective, multicentre, randomized, open study with blinded outcome assessment comparing different diagnostic methods for detection of paroxysmal AF in patients with recent TIA. The primary endpoint is the rate of AF detection during the 6 months after randomization. Approximately 40 centers in Europe (e.g. UK, Germany, and Spain) will participate in this trial. Patients with a recent TIA fulfilling the eligibility criteria (see below) will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion between 24 h arrhythmia monitoring (control arm) and the two procedures for prolonged ECG monitoring (interventional arms). That means we have two interventional arms, patients receiving either continuous 28d non-invasive ECG monitoring or ECG event recording using a subcutaneously implanted event recorder.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1434

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Neurologie
        • Contact:
          • Johannes Schiefer, MD
          • Phone Number: +49-241-8089630
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Johannes Schiefer, MD
      • Bad Neustadt An Der Saale, Germany, 97616
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Rhön Klinikum Campus Bad Neustadt
        • Contact:
          • Hassan Soda, MD
          • Phone Number: +49-9771-90800-9771
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hassan Soda, MD
      • Berlin, Germany, 12351
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
        • Contact:
          • Darius Nabawi, MD
          • Phone Number: +49-30-130-142023
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Darius Nabawi, MD
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44137
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Dortmund, Klinikzentrum Mitte / Neurologie
        • Contact:
          • Gernot Reimann, MD
          • Phone Number: +49-231-953-0
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gernot Reimann, MD
      • Essen, Germany, 45131
        • Recruiting
        • Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roland Veltkamp, MD
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Neurologie
        • Contact:
          • Jan Purrucker, MD
          • Phone Number: +46-6221-567504
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jan Purrucker, MD
      • Lübeck, Germany, 23538
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
        • Contact:
          • Georg Royl, MD
          • Phone Number: +49-451-5000
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Georg Royl, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Eligibility Criteria:

Study Population Patients with a recent TIA will be enrolled during a period of approximately 24 months at participating European stroke centres. TIA patients may be enrolled after initial management as inpatients or outpatients. Consecutive screening and enrolment will be strongly encouraged and a screening log will be implemented at each site.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written informed consent by patient.
  • Age ≥ 50 years.
  • TIA diagnosed by a stroke physician defined as rapidly developing clinical signs of focal or global disturbances of cerebral function, lasting less than 24 hours with no apparent non-vascular cause and without evidence of recent brain infarction on available neuroimaging.
  • 12-channel ECG available before enrolment
  • Brain imaging without acute infarct available before enrolment (CCT or cranial MRI)
  • Vascular imaging of cervical vessels performed
  • Enrolment within 28 days after index episode. Exclusion Criteria
  • Previously documented history of AF
  • Ischemic stroke within the last 6 months before enrolment
  • Evidence of recent infarction on neuroimaging corresponding to symptoms at time of enrolment (e.g. DWI positive lesion on MRI scan)
  • Pre-screening monitoring for cardiac arrhythmias lasting ≥72 hours
  • AF lasting > 30 s on a 12 channel ECG or other ECG recording technique prior to enrolment
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year.
  • Significant stenosis > 50% in intracranial or extracranial vessels which, in the opinion of the investigator, is the likely cause of the patients TIA.
  • Severely disabled patients (i.e. modified Rankin Score >3)
  • Lack of therapeutic consequence in case of diagnosis of AF (e.g. other indication for long term anticoagulation
  • Pacemaker or Implanted Cardiac Defibrillator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Arm 1
Control arm, 24-h Holter monitoring
Other: Arm 2
Interventional arms, prolonged cardiac monitoring
Patients will be randomized to either receive 24-h Holter monitoring or receive one of the two modes for prolonged ECG recording (interventional arms). There are two interventional arms. Patients will either undergo 28-day ECG recording using a commercially available Holter recorder that can function as a non-invasive ECG patch or receive an implantable cardiac device (REVEAL LINQ).
Other Names:
  • Prolonged cardiac monitoring 28-day ECG
  • Prolonged cardiac monitoring implantable cardiac device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of newly detected AF at 6 month after study enrolment in patients with recent TIA
Time Frame: 6 month
Self reported or by other means detected newly AF
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of AF in TIA patients as determined by prolongend ECG Monitoring techniques
Time Frame: 24 month
Self reported or by other means detected newly AF
24 month
Rate of newly detected AF at 12 and 24 month after study enrolment in patients with recent TIA
Time Frame: 12 and 24 month
Self reported or by other means detected newly AF in longterm ECG Monitoring
12 and 24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roland Veltkamp, MD, Initiator of study, leader PI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on 24-h Holter monitoring

3
Subscribe