Assessment of a Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) in Advanced Gastro-Intestinal Cancers

January 25, 2023 updated by: Stanford University

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Examining the Use of The "Serious Illness Conversation Guide" (SICG) in Patients With Advanced Gastro-Intestinal Cancers

The purpose of the study is to determine whether standardized implementation of a scripted template for discussing important issues that arise near the end of life improves the care of those who have advanced cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective: To determine whether the Serious Illness Conversation Guide will improve the consistency with which providers have and document conversations regarding patients' goals and priorities as they near the end of life.

Secondary Objectives: 1. To assess whether having conversations as per this model will improve the quality of care near the end of life as determined by appropriate care in concordance with their goals of care.

2. To assess whether having conversations as per this model will improve patient Quality of Life (QOL) as per a validated scale.

3. To assess in patients with concordant care whether this model will improve patient QOL as per a validated scale 4. To assess provider opinions about end-of-life conversations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumor has progressed on both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI.
  • Exception: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors demonstrate a BRAF V600E mutation may be enrolled regardless of prior chemotherapy.
  • Exception: Patients whose tumors are MSI-H must have experience progression through immunotherapy in addition to the therapies mentioned above.
  • Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
  • Patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer whose tumor has progressed through first-line chemotherapy of any type.
  • Patients with metastatic cholangiocarcinoma whose tumor has progressed through first-line chemotherapy of any type.
  • Patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma whose tumor has progressed through PD1 blockade.
  • Patients with metastatic high-grade neuroendocrine tumor.
  • A patient with a metastatic GIST that has progressed through first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
  • Expected life expectancy of at least one month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient not meeting the above criteria
  • Non-English speaking patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Serious illness conversation guide (SICG)
Patients have "serious illness conversation" within 3 wks of randomization and every 3 months thereafter.
The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) is a structured communication template designed to provide effective tool in initiating advanced care planning discussion with patients.
Quality of life survey by questionnaire (FACT-G) given every three months
Active Comparator: Conversations by treating team
Patients have conversations as determined by treating team (but not using SICG tool).
Quality of life survey by questionnaire (FACT-G) given every three months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in proportions of patients with documented goals of care
Time Frame: 1 year
Difference in proportions of patients who have documented goals of care in medical records, assessed after death, for both arms
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in proportions of patients with appropriate care toward end of life
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients receiving appropriate care in line with their goals of care toward the end of life, by arm will be assessed.
1 year
Comparison of QOL survey measures by section
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of survey QOL measures by section for control and intervention arms will be done by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) , version 4 scale. It is a 28-item validated QoL questionnaire in patients receiving cancer treatment. All subscales are summed together to arrive at a total score. A higher point value is considered a better quality of life score
1 year
Overall comparison of QOL survey
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of survey QOL measures overall for control and intervention arms will be done by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) , version 4 scale. It is a 28-item validated QoL questionnaire in patients receiving cancer treatment. All subscales are summed together to arrive at a total score. A higher point value is considered a better quality of life score
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tyler P Johnson, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG)

3
Subscribe