Yoga and Aerobic Exercise Effects on Cognition

April 8, 2020 updated by: Sean Mullen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Examining the Association of Sun Salutations and Aerobic Exercise With Cognition Among Adults With Psychosocial Stress

The purpose of this acute randomized control study is to assess the feasibility of a low-to-moderate intensity Yoga intervention (i.e. sun salutations), and examine its effect on cognitive functioning, compared to engaging in aerobic activity or seated rest. Participants will include individuals who are currently experiencing symptoms of psychosocial stress or general anxiety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible participants will be randomized to one of three groups: 1. Sun salutations (Yoga), 2. Aerobic exercise (walking on a treadmill), 3. Seated rest (watching educational videos). Each activity will be 30 minutes in duration. Immediately before and after the 30 minute intervention, participants will undergo psychosocial and cognitive assessments. Prior to the intervention, participant's physical activity will be tracked for one week, via a consumer grade accelerometer.

Baseline and post-intervention testing will include a cognitive battery, psychosocial questionnaires, flexibility testing and physiological measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
        • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone between the ages of 18-45 years
  • Anyone with a score of 3 or higher on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptom checklist of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5. That is, anyone meeting 3 or more symptoms, on more days of the week than not, for the past 6 months:

    1. Restlessness, feeling keyed up or on edge. 2. Being easily fatigued. 3. Difficulty concentrating or mind going blank. 4. Irritability. 5. Muscle tension. 6. Sleep disturbance (difficulty falling or staying asleep, or restless, unsatisfying sleep).

  • Ability to exercise at moderate to vigorous activity levels (defined as 50%-75% of the adjusted age-predicted maximum heart rate)
  • Access to a smartphone and willingness to allow research staff to install a mobile activity tracker application (and space to allow for installation)
  • Willingness to be randomized into one of three groups

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone who is physically active (≥30 minutes, 2 or more times/week, for the last 3 months) and/or a regular practitioner of Yoga or mind-body activities (≥30 minutes, 2 or more times/week, for the last 3 months).
  • Anyone with serious chronic medical conditions that would preclude them from participating without a physician present, or anyone with a risk of seizure, or anyone having psychiatric and/or neurological disorders.
  • Anyone who does not consent to wearing the Fitbit, or does not have a smartphone that allows us to download an app on their phone.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Anyone incapable of performing the following movements at a moderate intensity- sitting, standing, kicking, pulling, pushing, bending one's elbows, bending the body forward, bending one's knees, lying down and getting up.
  • Anyone with blood pressure of 200/105 or more, and anyone who scores 1 or more on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  • Anyone refusing or unwilling to be randomized into either of the conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sun salutations
Sun salutations, breathing exercises, and relaxation, at a low to moderate intensity, for 30 minutes.
This group will be asked to participate in 25 minutes of low-to-moderate intensity Yoga. This acute session will include engaging in sun salutations, breathing exercises and relaxation. Sun salutations involves performing 10 postures in a particular sequence, and then repeating that sequence. Some of the positions include bending over and touching one's toes, and lying belly-down on the ground and pushing up from ground while arching backwards. The activity will begin as a low intensity activity for the first 5 minutes, and the intensity will be gradually increased. Participants' heart rate will be measured before and after the intervention. The intervention will be delivered by a video displayed on a tablet device. An orientation session in the beginning will familiarize participants with the activity.
Active Comparator: Aerobic exercise
Walking on a treadmill at low to moderate intensity for 30 minutes.
This group will be asked to walk on the treadmill for the same amount of time (i.e. 25 minutes) at a moderate intensity (50-70% of their maximum heart rate). Participants will receive an initial 5-minute orientation and then begin at a self-selected speed for the first 5 minutes. Heart rate will be measured and monitored by an undergraduate research assistant. Speed will be increased after 5 minutes if participants have not reached the moderate zone. If participants still have not reached the target heart rate zone by the 10-min mark, the incline of the treadmill will be increased by a 5% grade until the zone is reached.
Other: Seated rest (attentional control)
Watching educational videos for 30 minutes.
This group will be watching educational videos for the same amount of time as the intervention groups. An orientation session of 5 minutes will be held in the beginning. Participants will be watching videos on general health related topics, such as healthy eating, while being seated in a quiet room, free of distractions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
n-back task (Working memory)
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance on the n-back at 30 minutes
This is a computerized task measuring the working memory domain of cognition. The task had 3 conditions, namely, 0-back, 1-back and 2-back. Participants are presented with a series of stimuli one after the other. They have to decide whether the stimulus currently presented is the same as the stimulus presented "n" items before. For the 1-back task, participants have to decide whether the stimulus matches the stimulus presented 1 earlier. For the 2- back task, they have to decide whether the stimulus matches the stimulus presented 2 earlier. Reaction time and accuracy of the response are recorded.
Change from baseline performance on the n-back at 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trail Making test A and B (Global cognition)
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
This is a paper pencil task having 2 parts- Trails A and Trails B, with Trails B being more complex. In Trails A, there are 25 circles on a piece of paper numbered 1-25. Participants have to join these numbers in ascending order, as quickly as they can, without lifting their pencil. In Trails B, the participants have to join 25 circles in an ascending order, but they have to alternate between numbers and letters (1-A-2-B-3-C). Time to complete the task correctly is recorded.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Processing Speed)
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
In this task, participants are presented with a code key, in which numbers 1-9 are matched with a unique symbol. Then, they are presented with a sheet of paper having a series of symbols on it. Using the codekey, participants have to read aloud, the numbers that the symbols are associated with, in 2 minutes. The accuracy is recorded.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
State Trait Anxiety Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
This questionnaire has 20 items for assessing state anxiety. Participants respond on a 4-point scale ("Not at all" to "Very much so"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Visual Analog Scale for stress
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Participants have to indicate how stressed they are currently feeling on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 100 (as bad as it gets). Higher scores mean more stress.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Perceived Mental Fatigue
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Participants self rate their present moment feelings on a scale from 1 - 5 (1=not true at all, 5=very true) yielding a mean score across all 7 items, with higher scores indicating greater mental fatigue.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Focus of Attention
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants are asked to self rate (1 item) their focus of attention while engaged in the previous activity. Responses range from 0 (Internal thoughts) to 10 (external thoughts), with higher scores representing external focus of attention.
Day 1
Feeling Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
This scale measures how a participant is feeling at the present moment (valence) after a bout of exercise. It is an 11-point one-item measure ranging from +5 (very good) to -5 (very bad). Higher scores represent positive affect.
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Participants' heart rate will be measured using an oxymeter
Change from baseline performance at 30 minutes
Rating of Perceived Exertion
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants are asked to self rate their feeling of exertion on a 11 point scale, ranging from 6 (no exertion) to 20 (maximal exertion), for the activity they were engaged in during the intervention.
Day 1
Rating of Enjoyment and Intervention
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants will rate their enjoyment in terms of the delivery method and the intervention. This will include questions such as 'Did you like the video instruction for sun salutations?', 'Would you recommend this activity to your family and friends?' This will also include a semi-structured interview with those in the sun salutation group. For example, 'What about this activity did you find challenging?', 'To what extent did you enjoy the sun salutations activity?'
Day 1
Rating of Technology Ease of Use and Usability
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants will rate the technology used to deliver the intervention, in terms of its ease of use and usability. The items are based on the Technology Acceptance Model and will include questions such as 'The Yoga video was clear and understandable.'
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Madhura Phansikar, MA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20067

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Although this is not an NIH-funded study, we will update these records within 1 year of data collection completion per NIH guidelines.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be accessible on an open site (e.g., Open Science Framework https://osf.io/) with a request to interested parties to engage with the investigative team about any publication of these data in an effort to avoid redundancy. Appropriate authorship crediting investigators involved in the parent study conceptualization, and any consultation regarding data interpretation should be sought by any researchers interested in publishing these data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological

Clinical Trials on Sun salutations

3
Subscribe