Radiomics of Immunotherapeutics Response Evaluation and Prediction (RIREP)

Radiomics of Immunotherapeutics Response Evaluation and Prediction in Solid Tumor: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of CT radiomic analysis which serves as a high through-put analytical strategy applied to image big-data resource in evaluating and predicting the response of immunotherapeutics. A multi-center retrospective diagnostic test has been designed for this aim to compare the predictive performance of clinical model, qualitative model incorporating semantic CT features and image-based quantitative radiomic model. The reference standard of therapeutic effect is determined by the latest evaluation result utilizing iRECIST within 365 days after recruited. This study intends to enroll 400 participates who had been diagnosed with advanced somatic solid tumor confirmed by histo- or cyto-pathological examination and were planning to receive immunotherapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

285

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Inpatient records in each involved research center from 2017.01.01 to 2019.12.31.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histopathological or cytopathological confirmed solid tumor (including metastatic solid tumor).
  2. Patients ≥ 18 years of age on the day of baseline CT scan.
  3. Patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in any line of treatment.
  4. Patients with at least one measurable target lesion of which minor axis was greater than 15mm and without any local treatment.
  5. Female with a negative pregnancy test, or male who agree to use barrier methods of contraception through the therapy period.
  6. Patients with a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1.
  7. Patients underwent follow-up CT scans with an 6-9-week interval until 365 days after baseline CT scan.
  8. Patients with baseline and follow-up CT scans which meet the following conditions: a) Spiral computed tomography device of General Electric Healthcare or Siemens with greater than 16 rows of detectors ; b) Peak kilovoltage: 120kV; c) Dose: auto or fixed; d) Slice resolution: not less than 512 pixels multiply 512 pixels; e) Scanning range: from supraclavicular region to 2cm below the costophrenic angle for thorax, and from diaphragm to pubic symphysis for abdomen; f) contrast-enhanced scan utilizing nonionic low- or iso-osmolar contrast agent and including arterial phase, venous phase and delayed phase at least.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients received any kinds of cytotoxic drugs or experimental drugs 2 weeks before enrollment.
  2. Patients meet the contraindications of contrast-enhanced CT scan.
  3. Patients who were not suitable for continuous follow-up CT scans.
  4. Patients with severe myocardial infarction confirmed by ECG or left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) less than 40% or glomerular filtration rate(GFR) less than 45ml/min.
  5. Patients who cannot tolerate immunotherapy or with serious immune-related adverse response.
  6. Patients with severe interstitial pneumonia confirmed by baseline CT scan.
  7. Patients who cannot complete follow-up examinations scheduled by study design.
  8. Patients with AIDS or positive serum HIV antibodies.
  9. Patients with a CT scan presenting extremely low signal noise ratio or too much artifacts at any timepoint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Monotherapy
Patients who has received mono-therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Clinical: A diagnostic model incorporating clinical variables (Age, Pathological diagnosis, level of serum tumor biomarkers etc.)
Semantic: A diagnostic model incorporating semantic radiological features (shape, location, border, density etc.)
Other Names:
  • Radiological
Radiomic: A diagnostic model incorporating quantitative radiomic features (histogram, texture, morphology etc.)
Combined therapy
Patients who has received immune checkpoint inhibitor combining chemotherapy.
Clinical: A diagnostic model incorporating clinical variables (Age, Pathological diagnosis, level of serum tumor biomarkers etc.)
Semantic: A diagnostic model incorporating semantic radiological features (shape, location, border, density etc.)
Other Names:
  • Radiological
Radiomic: A diagnostic model incorporating quantitative radiomic features (histogram, texture, morphology etc.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year since course start (365 days)
Area under curve (AUC) of each diagnostic model
6 months and 1 year since course start (365 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Control Rate
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year since course start (365 days)
Disease Control Rate of immunotherapy
6 months and 1 year since course start (365 days)
Incidence
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Incidence of immune-related adverse events
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on Clinical

Subscribe