Brain-injured Patients Extubation Readiness Study (Biper)

October 19, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Readiness of Extubation in Brain-injured Patients Using a Clinical Score

The BIPER study is a stepped wedge cluster randomised clinical trial aiming to decrease extubation failure in critically-ill brain-injured patients with residual impaired consciousness using a simple clinical score.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severe brain-injured patients need mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation. After treatment of the acute neurological condition, weaning of the mechanical ventilation has to be initiated notably to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia and others complications. Nevertheless, extubation failure is very common in this population due to residual neurological impairment with airway control alteration.

Guidelines about weaning of mechanical ventilation and extubation exclude brain-injured patients with a residual impaired consciousness.

In 2017, a simple and pragmatic extubation readiness clinical score was validated in a prospective observational cohort study of 140 brain injured patients. (Godet et al. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):104-114) In this study, brain injured patients with residual impaired consciousness who succeeded a spontaneous breathing trial were extubated. In multivariate analysis, 4 clinical elements were associated with extubation success. A prediction score was determined using the odds ratio such as followed :

  1. Deglutition: 3 points if present
  2. Gag reflex: 4 points if present
  3. Cough: 4 points if present
  4. CRS-R Score, visual item > 2, 3 points if present For a cut-off value of 9, extubation failure could be predicted with a sensibility of 84%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 89% and a negative predictive value of 66%.

In order to participate, brain-injured patients will have to succeed a spontaneous breathing trial and meet all inclusion criteria, including not being able to obey to simple orders without sedation. Using a stepped wedge randomisation process with intensive care units as clusters, patients will be weaned and extubated under usual care or using the extubation readiness clinical score.

The authors' hypothesis is that this clinical score will allow physicians to extubate patients at the right time interval and prevent extubation failure in this frail population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

660

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Sigismond Lasocki
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Hugues De Courson
      • Bourg-en-Bresse, France
        • Terminated
        • CH
      • Caen, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Clément Gakuba
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Russell Chabanne
      • Grenoble, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Olivier Vincent
      • La Réunion, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Sophie Kauffmann
      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Natalie De Sa
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
        • Contact:
          • Florent Gobert
      • Marseille, France
        • Withdrawn
        • APHM
      • Montpellier, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pierre-François Perrigault
      • Nantes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pierre-André Rodié-Talbère
      • Nice, France
        • Terminated
        • Pasteur 2 Hospital - University Hospital
      • Nîmes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Claire Roger
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
        • Contact:
          • Mohamed Khemili
      • Poitiers, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Claire Dahyot-Fizelier
      • Rennes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Yoann Launey
      • Saint-Etienne, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Jérome Morel
      • Toulouse, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Geeraerts
      • Valence, France
        • Terminated
        • CH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute cerebral lesion with a Glasgow Coma Scale < 13 needing admission in ICU and mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation for neurological cause : cerebrovascular stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic including aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury or anoxo ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest
  • Mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours
  • 18 to 75 yers old
  • Neurological stability with no intracranial hypertension with minimal sedation
  • Glasgow Coma Scale motor response < 6
  • Spontaneous breathing trial succeeded
  • First extubation attempt
  • Affiliated to French Social Assurance System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Posterior Cerebral Fossa lesion
  • Status epilepticus
  • Spinal cord injury (tetraplegia or paraplegia)
  • Central nervous system infection
  • Life expectancy less than 48 hours or withdrawal of life sustaining therapy
  • Chronic respiratory failure
  • More than 3 failed spontaneous breathing trials
  • Chest trauma
  • Surgery planned within 7 days
  • Tracheotomy
  • Previous compromised upper airway permeability
  • Pregnant woman
  • Adult under the protection of the law

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of care
Clinicians decide whether to extubate or not following their ICU protocol

After treatment of the acute neurological condition, elligibility for a spontaneous breathing trial will be assessed 2 times a day.

In the control group, after a successful spontaneous breathing trial in unconscious patients, the extubation will be achieved according to the standard of care

Experimental: Extubation readiness clinical score
Clinicians decide whether to extubate or not following the extubation readiness clinical score

After treatment of the acute neurological condition, elligibility for a spontaneous breathing trial will be assessed 2 times a day.

In the intervention group, after a successful spontaneous breathing trial in unconscious patients, the score will be evaluated.

If the score is >9, extubation has to be completed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extubation failure
Time Frame: Day 5 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Extubation failure is defined as a need of reintubation or death
Day 5 (Day 0 = Extubation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Invasive mechanical ventilation duration
Time Frame: End of the ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Period expressed in days during which patients will need invasive mechanical ventilation
End of the ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation duration
Time Frame: End of the ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Period expressed in days during which patients will need non-invasive mechanical ventilation
End of the ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Reintubation rate
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Patients needing reintubation during entire ICU stay
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Reintubation rate
Time Frame: Until Day 2 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Patients needing reintubation during entire ICU stay
Until Day 2 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Causes of reintubation
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Causes of reintubation if needed
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: End of ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
ICU length of stay expressed in days
End of ICU Stay or Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Post extubation nosocomial pneumonia
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Post extubation nosocomial pneumonia is defined as a pulmonary infection after extubation that necessitate antibiotic therapy
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Tracheotomy before extubation
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Number of patients that necessitate a tracheotomy after a successful spontaneous breathing trial but before extubation
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Tracheotomy after extubation
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Number of patients that necessitate a tracheotomy afetr extubation failure
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Neurological outcome
Time Frame: Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Neurological outcome using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended
Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: End of Hospital Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Hospital length of stay expressed in days
End of Hospital Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Mortality
Time Frame: Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Deceased patient in each group
Until the end of the ICU Stay or until Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 28 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Deceased patient in each group
Day 28 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)
Deceased patient in each group
Day 90 (Day 0 = Extubation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carole Ichai, CHU Nice
  • Study Director: Russell Chabanne, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
  • Principal Investigator: Olivier Vincent, University Hospital, Grenoble
  • Principal Investigator: Florent Gobert, Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • Principal Investigator: Jérôme Morel, CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
  • Principal Investigator: Matthieu Jeannot, CH Valence
  • Principal Investigator: Ségolène Mrozek, CHU Toulouse
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre-François Perrigault, University Hospital, Montpellier
  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas Bruder, La Timone - Assistance Publique Hôpital de Marseille
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Leone, Hôp Nord - Assistance Publique Hôpital de Marseille
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Lebard, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
  • Principal Investigator: Camille Bouisse, CH de Bourg-en-Bresse
  • Principal Investigator: Claire Roger, CHU Nîmes
  • Principal Investigator: Karim Asehnoune, Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 13, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 13, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Standard of care

3
Subscribe