- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04081233
Surgical Stabilization for Rib Fractures (SSRF)
March 31, 2024 updated by: David E. Meyer, MD, MS, FACS, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The Effect of Early Stabilization of Rib Fractures on Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare the usual care alone to usual care plus early surgical stabilization in adult trauma patients who have been admitted with rib fractures, to evaluate for heterogeneity of treatment effect in high risk subgroups and to determine the the impact of multiple rib fractures on post-discharge health status and time to return to work or usual physical activity.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
84
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: David E Meyer, MD
- Phone Number: 713-500-7244
- Email: David.E.Meyer@uth.tmc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lily Stephens, RN
- Phone Number: (713) 500-5461
- Email: Lily.A.Stephens@uth.tmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Blunt trauma mechanism
- Severe chest wall injury (defined by one of the 3 below):
Radiographic flail segment (defined as greater than 2 fractures in greater than 3 consecutive ribs) or greater than 5 consecutive rib fractures or greater than 1 rib fractures with bicortical displacement
- At least one true rib (1-7) fractured and accessible for stabilization
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe traumatic brain injury (best resuscitated GCS less than 8 as measured at 24 hours)
- Spinal cord injury
- Pre-existing congestive heart failure or oxygen-dependent pulmonary disease
- Any reason for which SSRF could not occur within 72 hours of admission
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Early surgical stabilization
This arm will include early surgical stabilization (within 72 hours of admission) in addition to the usual care received for patients with multiple rib fractures.
Usual care will involve pain management.
|
Surgical procedure utilizing any commercially available internal rib fixation system
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Usual care
This arm will be usual care only.
Usual care will include pain managment.
|
Usual care typically consists of breathing exercises and pain control,often including opioids
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 180 days after admission
|
Number of days patient is in the hospital
|
180 days after admission
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mortality
Time Frame: 180 days after admission
|
Death following trauma injury involving rib fractures
|
180 days after admission
|
Incidence of Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Greater Than 24 Hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after hospital admission
|
number of patients who require mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours
|
24 hours after hospital admission
|
Number of Patients Who Developed Pneumonia During the Hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months after admission
|
Number of patients diagnosed with pneumonia with greater than 10,000 cfu/ml on bronchioalveolar lavage or clinical diagnosis of pneumonia with subsequent antibiotic coverage
|
6 months after admission
|
Number of Patients Who Received Regional Analgesia
Time Frame: 6 months after admission
|
Number of patients utilizing regional analgesia, such as epidural, paravertebral, intercostal or serratus plane anesthesia
|
6 months after admission
|
Opioid Usage
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Opioid usage is reported in milligrams per patient pre-randomization
|
Baseline
|
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Free Days
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Number of inpatient hospital days patient was not in ICU in the first 30 days
|
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Hospital (ICU) Free Days
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
|
Number of days patient was not in the hospital during the first 30 days after admission.
|
30 days post admission
|
Re-intervention Rates for Surgical Complications
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
The number of times a procedure was required to treat surgical complications
|
180 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
|
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
30 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
|
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
90 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
180 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
|
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression).
It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
30 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
|
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression).
It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
90 days post admission
|
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression).
It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
180 days post admission
|
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
|
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain, Anxiety) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5).
A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
|
30 days post admission
|
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
|
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5).
A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
|
90 days post admission
|
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L).
Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5).
A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
|
180 days post admission
|
Time From Injury to Return to Work
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Number of days from time of injury until patient was able to return to work prior to injury per patient's assessment
|
180 days post admission
|
Time From Injury to Resolution of Pain
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Number of days from time of injury to time patient verbalized pain was resolved
|
180 days post admission
|
Time From Injury to Return to Usual Activity
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
Number of days from time of injury until patient was able to return to usual activities prior to injury per patient's assessment
|
180 days post admission
|
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
|
30 days post admission
|
|
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
|
90 days post admission
|
|
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
|
180 days post admission
|
|
Number of Patients Requiring Tracheostomy
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Number of patients requiring a tracheostomy due to prolonged mechanical ventilation
|
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Opioid Usage
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Opioid usage is reported in milligrams per patient from admission to discharge
|
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Ventilator Free Days
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Number of inpatient hospital days patients did not require mechanical ventilation
|
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Number of Participants Prescribed Opioids at Discharge
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David E Meyer, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 23, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 4, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
September 9, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 2, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 31, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-19-0649
- KL2TR003168 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Trauma Chest
-
Hospital de GranollersCompleted
-
Radboud University Medical CenterRecruitingBlunt Chest TraumaNetherlands
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingChest Trauma PatientsEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingChest Injury Trauma
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruiting
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth...CompletedPulmonary Contusion , Chest Trauma , Prediction Model
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaAzienda ospedaliera universitaria Careggi; Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Huda Fahmy Mahmoud, PhDCompleted
-
Sameh FathyCompleted
Clinical Trials on surgical stabilization
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingSPINAL Fracture | Burst Fracture | Spinal Instability of Thoracolumbar RegionSwitzerland
-
Uppsala UniversityKarolinska University Hospital; Karolinska Institutet; Oslo University Hospital; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Gwendolyn VuurbergZimmer Biomet; Albert Schweitzer Hospital; Centro Hospitalar do Porto; Amphia Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingChronic Ankle InstabilityNetherlands, Portugal, Switzerland
-
Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDePuy SynthesCompleted
-
UMC UtrechtWithdrawnNeoplasm Metastasis | Surgery | Spinal Neoplasms | RadiosurgeryNetherlands
-
Balgrist University HospitalWithdrawnSpinal TumorSwitzerland
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompletedRotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeCanada
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsBrown University; LifespanCompletedTraumatic Amputation of ArmUnited States
-
Real Fundación Victoria EugeniaUnknownSports Physical TherapySpain
-
Prof A Gruca Teaching HospitalRecruiting