Surgical Stabilization for Rib Fractures (SSRF)

March 31, 2024 updated by: David E. Meyer, MD, MS, FACS, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The Effect of Early Stabilization of Rib Fractures on Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the usual care alone to usual care plus early surgical stabilization in adult trauma patients who have been admitted with rib fractures, to evaluate for heterogeneity of treatment effect in high risk subgroups and to determine the the impact of multiple rib fractures on post-discharge health status and time to return to work or usual physical activity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Blunt trauma mechanism
  • Severe chest wall injury (defined by one of the 3 below):

Radiographic flail segment (defined as greater than 2 fractures in greater than 3 consecutive ribs) or greater than 5 consecutive rib fractures or greater than 1 rib fractures with bicortical displacement

  • At least one true rib (1-7) fractured and accessible for stabilization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe traumatic brain injury (best resuscitated GCS less than 8 as measured at 24 hours)
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Pre-existing congestive heart failure or oxygen-dependent pulmonary disease
  • Any reason for which SSRF could not occur within 72 hours of admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early surgical stabilization
This arm will include early surgical stabilization (within 72 hours of admission) in addition to the usual care received for patients with multiple rib fractures. Usual care will involve pain management.
Surgical procedure utilizing any commercially available internal rib fixation system
Other Names:
  • Rib plating
Active Comparator: Usual care
This arm will be usual care only. Usual care will include pain managment.
Usual care typically consists of breathing exercises and pain control,often including opioids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 180 days after admission
Number of days patient is in the hospital
180 days after admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 180 days after admission
Death following trauma injury involving rib fractures
180 days after admission
Incidence of Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Greater Than 24 Hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after hospital admission
number of patients who require mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours
24 hours after hospital admission
Number of Patients Who Developed Pneumonia During the Hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months after admission
Number of patients diagnosed with pneumonia with greater than 10,000 cfu/ml on bronchioalveolar lavage or clinical diagnosis of pneumonia with subsequent antibiotic coverage
6 months after admission
Number of Patients Who Received Regional Analgesia
Time Frame: 6 months after admission
Number of patients utilizing regional analgesia, such as epidural, paravertebral, intercostal or serratus plane anesthesia
6 months after admission
Opioid Usage
Time Frame: Baseline
Opioid usage is reported in milligrams per patient pre-randomization
Baseline
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Free Days
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Number of inpatient hospital days patient was not in ICU in the first 30 days
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Hospital (ICU) Free Days
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
Number of days patient was not in the hospital during the first 30 days after admission.
30 days post admission
Re-intervention Rates for Surgical Complications
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
The number of times a procedure was required to treat surgical complications
180 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
30 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
90 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L)
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Health status will be assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L VAS score is directly reported by participants and ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
180 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression). It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
30 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression). It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
90 days post admission
Health Status as Assessed by Index Score on the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Health Status will be assessed by the index score on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). The Euro QoL 5-D 5-L index score ranges from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), and it is a summary score based on societal preference weights for the cumulative health states measured by 5 different dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression). It is calculated using the 2017 United States time trade-off valuation data set. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
180 days post admission
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain, Anxiety) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
30 days post admission
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
90 days post admission
Health Status as Indicated by Level of Impairment as Assessed by the Euroqol-5D-5L
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Level of impairment will be assessed for five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Daily activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression) by using the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Euro QoL 5-D 5-L). Each dimension is rated at five levels: no impairment (1); minor impairment (2); moderate impairment (3); severe impairment (4); and extreme impairment (5). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
180 days post admission
Time From Injury to Return to Work
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Number of days from time of injury until patient was able to return to work prior to injury per patient's assessment
180 days post admission
Time From Injury to Resolution of Pain
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Number of days from time of injury to time patient verbalized pain was resolved
180 days post admission
Time From Injury to Return to Usual Activity
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
Number of days from time of injury until patient was able to return to usual activities prior to injury per patient's assessment
180 days post admission
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 30 days post admission
30 days post admission
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 90 days post admission
90 days post admission
Number of Participants Back to Work or Normal Physical Activity
Time Frame: 180 days post admission
180 days post admission
Number of Patients Requiring Tracheostomy
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Number of patients requiring a tracheostomy due to prolonged mechanical ventilation
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Opioid Usage
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Opioid usage is reported in milligrams per patient from admission to discharge
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Ventilator Free Days
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Number of inpatient hospital days patients did not require mechanical ventilation
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Number of Participants Prescribed Opioids at Discharge
Time Frame: Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)
Hospital discharge (about 20 to 30 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David E Meyer, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-19-0649
  • KL2TR003168 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma Chest

Clinical Trials on surgical stabilization

3
Subscribe