The Moderating Roles of Social Support, Coping Resources and Personality and Mediating Role of Self-esteem on the Impact of Cognitive Deficit on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Among Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Mixed-method Sequential Explanatory Design

January 19, 2021 updated by: Rose Sin Yi Lin, Chinese University of Hong Kong
This is a sequential mixed study to test the hypothesized models with seven hypotheses of the relationship between cognitive deficit (subject and objective) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (PwMCI). The study will also examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Mild Behavioural Impairment -Checklist (MBI-C).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this study is to test the hypothesized model that explores the moderating roles of neurotic personality, social support and coping style, as well as the mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between cognitive deficit and NPS. This study will also examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of MBI-C.

Specifically, the four objectives of this study are as follows:

  1. To examine the relationship between cognitive deficit (subjective and objective) and NPS
  2. To examine the moderating roles of the neurotic trait (neuroticism) and coping resources (coping style and social support), as well as the mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between cognitive deficit and NPS
  3. To explore the life experience of PwMCI that help to determine how these factors moderate/ mediate the relationship between cognitive deficit and NPS
  4. To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of MBI-C among PwMCI in Hong Kong

This sequential mixed study will be conducted in two non-governmental organization in Hong Kong.

For the first and second objective, a descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational approach will be adopted to test the hypothesized models with seven hypotheses of the relationship between cognitive deficit (subject and objective) and NPS. The moderating roles of personality trait (neuroticism) and coping resources (coping styles and social support), as well as the mediating role of self-esteem in such a relationship, will also be explored.

For the third objective, semi-structured interviews will be adopted to explore the life experience of PwMCI, which help understanding how the proposed factors mediate or moderate the relationship between compromised abilities and NPS.

For the fourth objective, the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of MBI-C will be examined and reported. Internal consistency, 2-week test-retest reliability, factorial validity, concurrent validity and convergent validity will be assessed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Persons with mild cognitive impairment in Hong Kong

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years old or above
  • Able to communicate in Cantonese
  • Diagnosis with MCI as defined by the following criteria:

    1. Presence of significant cognitive complaints, as defined by more than three complaints on the Memory Inventory for Chinese (MIC), which is a 27-item instrument measuring subjective memory deficit
    2. Abnormal objective cognitive performance defined as < 1.5 standard deviations from age and education matched normal persons on Hong Kong Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA), which is a 12-item instrument measuring cognitive functions
    3. Independence in daily living as evaluated through clinical interview
  • Both patients and one of their guardian or family members are consented to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With the confirmed diagnosis of any forms of dementia
  • With the confirmed diagnosis of psychiatric morbidities, or history with stroke, brain injury and other neurological conditions that may affect cognitive, behavioural and emotional functioning which may confound outcome measurement and limit their participation in the study
  • With hearing or visual impairment that may hinder participation in research activities
  • Current use of cognitive intervention or electromagnetic stimulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
243 PwMCI
243 PwMCI will receive two face-to-face interviews to complete two sets of questionnaires, of which 30 participants will be recruited attend a 1-hour semi-structured interview.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chinese Version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q)
Time Frame: Baseline
NPI-Q is a caregiver-administered instrument that assesses measure the frequency and severity of NPS among the participants.This instrument measures 12 domains including delusion, hallucination, anxiety, depression, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behaviour, sleep disturbance and appetite. The instrument will be completed by an informant to rate the frequency of NPS on a four-point scale (1 - sporadically, 4 - very often) and the severity of NPS on a three-point scale (1 - mild, 3 - severe).
Baseline
Hong Kong Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline
This 12-item instrument will be used to measure cognitive functions including visuospatial functions, naming, verbal memory, abstraction, delay memory, calculation and orientation. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating more severe cognitive impairment.
Baseline
Chinese version of Chinese version of Mild Behavioural Impairment -Checklist
Time Frame: Baseline
This 34-item questionnaire will be used to measure five domains of NPS, including decreased motivation, emotional dysregulation, impulse dyscontrol, social inappropriateness and abnormal perception or thought content. It involves closed-ended questions on the existence of symptoms followed by a 3-point Likert scale on their severity. Total scores of all domains range from 0 to 102, with higher scores indicating more NPS.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chinese version of Simplified Coping Scale Questionnaire (SCSQ)
Time Frame: Baseline
This 20-item questionnaire will be adopted to evaluate their attitude towards life events, which could be divided into active (12 items) and passive (eight items) coping styles. Each item is rated at four-point Likert scale, with subscale score are summed from the items in each subscale. A higher subscale score indicates more frequent use of the coping style.
Baseline
Chinese version of Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS-C)
Time Frame: Baseline
This 12-item instrument measures the availability of support from family (4 items) and friends (8 items) on a seven-point Likert scale with total scores range from 12 to 48. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived social support.
Baseline
Chinese version of the neuroticism subscale of NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI)
Time Frame: Baseline
This 12-item neuroticism subscale will be adopted to measure neuroticism over manageability, comprehensibility and meaningfulness on a five-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating a more neurotic personality.
Baseline
Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline
The 10-item scale will be adopted to evaluate the sense of self-worth through five positive and five negative statements on a four-point Likert scale, all items are summed to total scores that range from 10 to 40, with a higher score indicating higher level of self-esteem.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavioral Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Face-to-face interviews

Subscribe