- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04085406
DBS of the SCC for the Treatment of Medically Refractory CLBP
April 22, 2023 updated by: Ausaf A. Bari, MD, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subgenual Cingulate Cortex for the Treatment of Medically Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the subgenual cingulate cortex for the treatment of chronic medically-refractory low back pain using a randomized double-blind crossover design.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most ubiquitous and intractable problems in medicine and a significant source of patient suffering and disability, leading to opioid misuse and addiction.
Previous neuromodulatory therapies for CLBP have focused primarily on spinal etiologies and intra-spinal mechanisms of pain transmission.
However, existing pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies have not been successful in treating CLBP.
This project aims to address critical gaps and the unmet therapeutic needs of CLBP patients by using the Abbott Infinity DBS System; a next generation DBS device with directional steering capability implanted bilaterally in the subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC) to engage networks known to mediate the affective component of CLBP.
The objective is to (1) Assess the preliminary efficacy of DBS of the SCC in the treatment of medically refractory CLBP; (2) Demonstrate the safety and feasibility of SCC DBS for CLBP; and (3) Develop diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based blueprints of response to SCC DBS for CLBP.
The overall impact of this proof-of-concept pilot trial includes validation of the concept that suffering from CLBP results from pathological activity in affective brain networks, that these networks can be accurately engaged using a next-generation directional DBS device in a safe and feasible manner, and the discover of neuroimaging biomarkers of response to SCC DBS for CLBP.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
16
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Wenxin Wei
- Phone Number: 3108170451
- Email: WenxinWei@mednet.ucla.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90067
- Recruiting
- University of California Los Angeles
-
Contact:
- Wenxin Wei
- Phone Number: 310-817-0451
- Email: WenxinWei@mednet.ucla.edu
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- Not yet recruiting
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Nader Pouratian, MD PhD
- Email: Nader.Pouratian@UTSouthwestern.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) as defined by persistent low back pain despite prior surgical interventions.
- Self-reported average back pain intensity of greater than 8 out of 10 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) documented over greater than 2 years.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief from a trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or less than 50% pain relief after 3 months of SCS therapy or patient refuses/rejects SCS trial
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to at least 4 weeks of physical therapy.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to at least 2 percutaneous spinal pain procedures.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to 3 months of opioid therapy (at least 20 MEQ/day) or inability to increase or tolerate opioid therapy due to dose-limiting side effects).
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to a 3-month trial of at least one other class of pain medication in addition to opioid therapy or inability to tolerate increasing doses of non-opioid pain medications due to dose-limiting side effects.
- Lack of a surgically correctible etiology for the pain as determined by 2 independent neurosurgeons
- Age greater than 40 years of age.
- Ability to give informed consent in accordance with institutional policies and participate in the 1.5-year follow-up, involving assessments and stimulator adjustments.
- Willingness to share unexpected neurological or psychiatric symptoms with study clinicians.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant neurocognitive impairment (MoCA < 26).
- Age > 75 years.
- History of implant-related infection.
- History of bleeding disorder or immune-compromise.
- Psychiatric comorbidity other than depression or generalized anxiety disorder, as determined by MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview.
- Patients with neurological diagnoses that may reduce the response to or increase the risk of DBS including neurodegenerative conditions, severe movement disorders, demyelinating disorders, syringomyelia, epilepsy or history of seizures, history of CNS tumors (spinal and/or cranial), history of serious head injury with loss of consciousness, history of stroke, surgically reversible peripheral pain syndromes including surgically correctable radiculopathy, and severe peripheral neuropathy.
- Patients who have undergone spine surgery within the previous 3 months.
- Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including uncontrolled hypertension, severe diabetes, major organ system failure, history of hemorrhagic stroke, need for chronic anticoagulation, active infection, immunocompromised state or malignancy with < 5 years life expectancy.
- Individuals with a currently implanted SCS device.
- Individuals with a life expectancy less than 1 year due to any cause.
- Individuals involved in an injury claim under current litigation.
- Individuals with a pending or approved worker's compensation claim.
- Patient living greater than 100 miles from UCLA.
- Suicide attempt in the last two years and/or presence of a suicide plan (an answer of Yes to Question C4 in Section C- Suicidality of MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview).
- Alcohol or illicit substance use disorder (other than nicotine) within the last 6 months, unstable remission of substance abuse, or chart evidence that co-morbid substance use disorder could account for lack of treatment response.
- Uncontrolled medical condition including cardiovascular problems and diabetes.
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant.
- Use of warfarin or other blood thinners.
- Significant structural abnormality on preoperative brain MRI.
- Contraindications to MRIs or the need for recurrent body MRIs.
- Presence of cardiac pacemakers/defibrillators, implanted medication pumps, intra-cardiac lines, any intracranial implants (e.g., aneurysm clip, shunt, cochlear implant, electrodes) or other implanted stimulators.
- History of prior cranial neurosurgery.
- Patients unable to discontinue any existing therapeutic diathermy.
- Individuals who are concomitantly participating in another clinical study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active Stimulation
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: Active Treatment (active stimulation programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the initial open-label period) and a Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V).
|
The Abbott Infinity DBS device will be surgically implanted in the bilateral subgenual cingulate cortex to provide electrical stimulation to this region.
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: Active Treatment (active stimulation programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the initial open-label phase) and a Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V).
|
The Abbott Infinity DBS device will be surgically implanted in the bilateral subgenual cingulate cortex to provide electrical stimulation to this region.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of at least 50% in pain scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) compared to baseline.
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The visual analog scale for pain is a continuous horizontal scale of length 100 mm with the extremes of pain expressed on either end (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain).
The change on the VAS from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in at least 50% in pain scores on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale -- Short Form 20 (PASS SF-20) compared to baseline.
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The PASS SF-20 score is a composite 20 item score which focuses on fear and anxiety of pain.
It includes 4 sections on aspects of pain including cognitive, escape/avoidance, fear and physiological anxiety.
All items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 5 (always), where higher values indicate worse outcome.
Summary scores are calculated by summing assigned items and then by summing the subscales to derive an overall score for a possible total of 100.
The change on the PASS from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
At least 10% of study participants to experience one or more significant adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: 18 months - the end of the study
|
The percentage of subjects with one or more SAEs during the entire study period will be calculated.
|
18 months - the end of the study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in dose and/or frequency of opioid analgesic medication use in oral morphine equivalents.
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The effect of therapy on reduction in opioid medication intake will be compared to baseline.
Opioid use will be converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
The MME taken in the preceding month will be calculated using chart review and expressed in MMEs/ day and total MMEs/month expressed as a percentage of the baseline usage calculated as the average MMEs/day and MMEs/month over the previous six months before the start of enrollment.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
50% improvement in McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a well validated and reliable measure of pain.
The MPQ captures pain intensity on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is pain as bad as it can be.
It is a well validated measure of sensory, affective, and evaluative pain.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire score.
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Short Form 36.
The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health.
The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used in health economics as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section.
Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight.
The lower the score the more disability.
The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in EuroQol 5-Domain (EQ-5D) Score
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The EQ-5D is a 5-item patient self-reported survey of health-related quality of life questions consisting of a descriptive part and an evaluation part.
The descriptive part includes 5 categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/ discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each category can be rated as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3 - for a total of the 5 categories.
In the evaluation part, subjects rate their overall health on a visual analog scale (0 to100, where 100 is most healthy).
The change in the EQ-5D score from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score (MoCA)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The MoCA is a 30-point cognitive test which measures memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, attention, language and orientation to time and place.
The MoCA score will be used to assess potential adverse effects of stimulation on cognition.
Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes.
The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
The change in the MoCA score from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The HAM-D is a 17-item rating scale for depression.
It is the most frequently used depression rating scale used in controlled clinical trials.
It provides ratings on current DSM-IV symptoms of depression, with the exceptions of hypersomnia, increased appetite, and concentration/indecision.
The HAMD-17 was designed to be administered by a trained clinician using a semi-structured clinical interview.
The 17- items are rated on either a 5-point (0-4) or a 3-point (0-2) scale.The change in the HAM-D score from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The ODI is a self-assessment of disability secondary to low back pain.
The ODI consists of ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel.
Each item is rated from 0 to 5, the item scores summed and then multiplied by 2 to arrive at a combined final index score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (highest disability),.
The change in the ODI from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
NIH Toolbox Pain Interference CAT asks participants about how their experience of pain interfered with or affected their enjoyment of various daily activities in the past seven days.
The CAT scale is computer-adaptive and has a minimum of four questions and a maximum of 12 questions.
The questions ask for a response on a 5-point scale: "Not at all" to "Very much"; or rated: "Never" "Always".
The test is self-assessed using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The survey is scored using IRT (item response theory) methods.
An IRT theta score is generated for each participant, and while no Toolbox norms are available for this measure, the IRT scores are converted to general T-scores based off PROMIS (pain intensity scale).
Higher theta and T-Scores represent greater participant report of pain interference.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a fixed form test consists 3 questions about the subject's worst pain and average pain over the past 7 days and current pain level.
All items are self-reported on a scale of 1 (no pain) -5 (maximal pain).
The test is self-assessed using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the PROMIS Pain Behavior CAT
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The PROMIS Pain Behavior CAT measures pain related behavioral changes.
All items are self-reported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
With CAT, participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (20 items in total).
The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT), a family of statistical models that link individual questions to a presumed underlying trait or concept of pain behavior represented by all items in the item bank.
The final score is represented by the T-score, a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox Positive Affect CAT
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The NIH Toolbox Positive Affect CAT measures positive affect.
All items are self-reported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT).
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox Sadness CAT
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The NIH Toolbox Sadness CAT measures the subject's level of sadness.
All items are self-reported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT).
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox General Life Satisfaction CAT
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The NIH Toolbox General Life Satisfaction CAT measures life satisfaction.
All items are self-reported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT).
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Fixed Form (FF)
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress FF is a 10-item measure of perceived stress.
All items are selfreported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT).
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the PROMIS Prescription Pain Medication Misuse CAT
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The PROMIS Prescription Pain Medication Misuse CAT is a 17-item measure of misuse and/or abuse of prescription pain medications.
All items are self-reported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT).
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Toolbox Locomotion
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
The NIH Toolbox Locomotion measures locomotion.
Participants walk a short distance at their usual pace, completing one practice and two-timed trials.
Scores are recorded as time in seconds required to walk 4 meters on each of two trials, with the better trial used for scoring.
An administrator will use the NIH toolbox app to assist in conducting this assessment.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Change in the NIH Pain Intensity Survey
Time Frame: 12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
NIH Toolbox Pain Intensity Survey consists of one self-report item asking about the participant's level of pain in the past seven days.
Participants are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
All items are selfreported on using the NIH Toolbox app which will be installed on an iPad provided to the subject for the duration of the study.
The change from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
|
12 months - the end of the crossover period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ausaf Bari, MD PhD, UCLA Department of Neurosurgery
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
June 30, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 7, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
September 11, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 25, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2023
Last Verified
April 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UH3NS113661 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Iran University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain | Cupping Therapy
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisRecruitingBack Pain | Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Back Pain Lower Back ChronicBrazil
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
University of Colorado, BoulderNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Radiological Society of North America; Psychophysiologic... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Back Pain, LowUnited States
-
Presidio Medical, IncRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low-back PainAustralia
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalHighland Instruments, Inc.Active, not recruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Active, not recruiting
-
Dan RhonNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH); 59th Medical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Surgery | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Back Pain, LowUnited States
Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subgenus Cingulate Cortex
-
University Health Network, TorontoWeston Brain InstituteRecruitingFrontotemporal Dementia | Deep Brain StimulationCanada
-
Jorge Gonzalez-MartinezNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Stroke | Central Nervous System Diseases | Nervous System Diseases | Brain DiseaseUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityZhejiang University; Huzhou Third People's Hospital; Wenzhou Seventh People's... and other collaboratorsRecruitingTreatment-Resistant DepressionChina
-
German Parkinson Study Group (GPS)Medtronic; Competence Network on Parkinson's DiseaseUnknownDystoniaGermany, Austria
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Princess Beatrix Muscle FoundationUnknownDystonia | Primary Generalized DystoniaNetherlands
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruiting
-
University of CologneGerman Research FoundationCompleted
-
Jonathan JagidUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedPain | Autonomic DysreflexiaUnited States
-
University Hospital TuebingenAbbottActive, not recruitingParkinson DiseaseGermany
-
Hospital San Carlos, MadridUnknown