Electroacupuncture Combined With Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

October 2, 2019 updated by: Simon S. M. Ng, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Electroacupuncture Combined With Fast-track Perioperative Program for Reducing Duration of Postoperative Ileus and Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The investigators' previous study demonstrated that electroacupuncture (EA) reduces the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within a traditional perioperative care setting. Recent evidence also suggested that a 'fast-track' (FT) perioperative program may help accelerate recovery after colorectal surgery. It is uncertain whether the combination of EA and FT program will result in faster recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery when compared with FT program alone.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of EA combined with FT program versus FT program alone in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Design: Prospective randomized trial.

Subjects: 72 consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer without conversion will be recruited.

Interventions: Patients will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups receiving either EA + FT program, or FT program alone.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome: time to defecation. Secondary outcomes: duration of hospital stay, time to resume diet, pain scores, analgesic requirement, morbidity, quality of life, and medical costs.

Conclusions: This study serves as a good example that illustrates an integrated approach in combining Chinese and Western models of health care. It will provide evidence-based clarification of the role of EA in enhancing recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within a FT perioperative care setting. As laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been shown to have a higher direct cost than the open counterpart, a faster postoperative recovery may help reduce the financial burden to the hospital/healthcare system.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tony WC Mak, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma of the colorectum of which the lowest margin of the tumor is located >12 cm from the anal verge as measured by rigid sigmoidoscopy)
  • Age of patients >18 years
  • Those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading I-III
  • Those with no cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination score 24 out of 30)
  • Those with no severe physical disability
  • Those who require no assistance with the activities of daily living
  • Informed consent available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal resection, or total/proctocolectomy; those with planned stoma creation
  • Those undergoing simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and other coexisting intraabdominal diseases
  • Those undergoing laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer with en bloc resection of surrounding organs
  • Those who developed intraoperative problems or complications that required conversion
  • Those undergoing emergency surgery
  • Those with evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis
  • Those with previous history of midline laparotomy
  • Those who are expected to receive epidural opioids for postoperative pain management
  • Those who are pregnant
  • Those with cardiac pacemaker
  • Those with coagulopathy
  • Those who are allergic to the acupuncture needles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electroacupuncture Plus Fast-track Perioperative Program
Patients who are randomized to the intervention arm will receive Electroacupuncture combined with Fast-track program. Each session of Electroacupuncture will last for 20 minutes. The patients will undergo one session of Electroacupuncture daily from day 1 till day 4, or until the time when the primary outcome has occurred, whichever is earlier.
As above
As above
Active Comparator: Fast-track Perioperative Program
Patients who are randomized to the control arm will receive Fast-track program alone.
As above

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to defecation
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Measured in hours, from the time the laparoscopic surgery ends till the first observed passage of stool.
Up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of first passing flatus reported by the patients
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Time to walk independently
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Direct/indirect medical costs and out-of-hospital economic costs
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Total postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery
Up to 1 month
Time that the patients tolerated solid diet
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Time that the patients tolerated solid diet (any food that required chewing) without vomiting or experiencing significant nausea 4 hours following the meal
Up to 1 month
Pain scores on visual analog scale
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
From 0 which implies no pain at all, to 100 which implies the worst pain imaginable, on the first 3 postoperative days
Up to 1 month
Postoperative 30-day morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications
Up to 1 month
Incidence rate of adverse events related to electroacupuncture
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Readmission rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Quality of life scores measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. It consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Up to 1 month
Quality of life scores measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaires at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a generic questionnaire for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. It includes 30 items, 24 of which are combined to form a global QoL scale, five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), and three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain). The other six single items evaluate dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. All questionnaires responses and scores will be linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on the global QoL and functional scales represents a higher level of QoL and functioning, whereas a higher score on the symptom scales/items represents a higher degree of symptoms or dysfunction.
Up to 1 month
Quality of life measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
EORTC QLQ-CR38 is a specific questionnaire module specifically designed for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in patients with colorectal cancer. It consists of 38 items covering symptoms and side effects related to different colorectal cancer treatment modalities. The module contains four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, and future perspective) and eight symptom scales/items (micturition problems, chemotherapy side effects, gastrointestinal tract symptoms, male sexual problems, female sexual problems, defecation problems, stoma-related problems, and weight loss). All questionnaires responses and scores will be linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on the global QoL and functional scales represents a higher level of QoL and functioning, whereas a higher score on the symptom scales/items represents a higher degree of symptoms or dysfunction.
Up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CREC 2017.668-T

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Ileus

Clinical Trials on Electroacupuncture

3
Subscribe