- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04097678
Intraoperative Radiographic Detection of Retained Surgical Sponges
October 4, 2021 updated by: Twin Cities Spine Center
This prospective study will determine the efficacy of intraoperative x-ray to identify retained surgical sponges.
The recommended practice for finding a retained sponge is by radiography.
The purpose is to find out how useful plain x-rays are in open posterior lumbar spine surgery, information which is presently unavailable.
The specific aim is to compare the sensitivity (seeing a sponge when one is actually present) and specificity (not seeing a sponge when one is not present) of radiography of the surgical field for three conditions: viewing one lateral radiograph versus viewing one anteroposterior radiograph versus viewing two radiographs together, one lateral and one anteroposterior.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized study with two cohorts: one experimental and one control.
Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) radiographs are routinely obtained as standard of care during spine surgery to confirm proper implant placement.
These images will be used in this study.
In one-half of the study subjects, after all sponges are removed, a surgical sponge will be intentionally placed in the surgical field prior to imaging.
Postoperatively, each subject's images will be assessed for the presence or absence of a retained surgical sponge.
Images will be independently read by two investigators.
When there is discordance, the images will be adjudicated by a third.
Interobserver agreement will be quantified using the Kappa statistic.
Those reading images will not have participated in the surgery.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
146
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55404
- Twin Cities Spine Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing open posterior instrumented lumbar spine surgery.
- Read and understand English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy.
- Patients who do not consent to research.
- Patients less than 18 years old at the time of consent.
- Do not read and understand English.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Retained Sponge Group
Just prior to imaging, the surgeon will purposely place a sponge in the wound.
Two radiographs will be taken of the spine (AP and Lateral views).
|
A surgical sponge will be intentionally placed in the surgical field prior to final imaging and then removed.
Postoperatively, images will be assessed for the presence or absence of a retained surgical sponge.
|
NO_INTERVENTION: No Retained Sponge Group
No sponge will be placed in the wound.
Two radiographs will be taken of the spine (AP and Lateral views).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Correct answers (number)
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
Each subject's AP and LAT images will be viewed and the investigator will note whether or not a sponge is seen (graded present or graded absent).
The investigator's answer will be compared to the true condition (actually present or actually absent).
Results will be analyzed to quantify the relative specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 1) an AP image alone, 2) a LAT image alone, and 3) AP and LAT images together.
|
Intraoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amir A Mehbod, MD, Twin Cities Spine Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, Storsveen A, Weisbrod C, Deschamps C. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jul;207(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.047. Epub 2008 May 23.
- Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, Sechrist C, Kercher K, Heniford BT. Retained foreign bodies after surgery. J Surg Res. 2007 Apr;138(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.08.001. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
- Turgut M, Akhaddar A, Turgut AT. Retention of Nonabsorbable Hemostatic Materials (Retained Surgical Sponge, Gossypiboma, Textiloma, Gauzoma, Muslinoma) After Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported During the Last Half-Century. World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:255-267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.119. Epub 2018 May 26.
- Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3.
- Revesz G, Siddiqi TS, Buchheit WA, Bonitatibus M. Detection of retained surgical sponges. Radiology. 1983 Nov;149(2):411-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.149.2.6622683.
- Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003 Sep;20(5):453-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.5.453. Erratum In: Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):126.
- Hellbach K, Beller E, Schindler A, Schoeppe F, Hesse N, Baumann A, Schinner R, Auweter S, Hauke C, Radicke M, Meinel FG. Improved Detection of Foreign Bodies on Radiographs Using X-ray Dark-Field and Phase-Contrast Imaging. Invest Radiol. 2018 Jun;53(6):352-356. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000450.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
November 10, 2020
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2023
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 19, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
September 20, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 5, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 4, 2021
Last Verified
October 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1290533
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
There is not a plan to make IPD available.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Sponge, Retained
-
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic UniversityEnrolling by invitationForeign Bodies | Surgical Sponge, RetainedSaudi Arabia
-
Assuta Medical CenterCompletedPostoperative Complications, Surgical Sponges, Surgical Instruments, Retained Surgical ToolsIsrael
-
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingChildbirth | Surgical Item, Retained
-
Massachusetts General HospitalUnknownBreast Cancer | Surgery | Surgical Item, Retained
-
Bait Balev HospitalMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelCompletedRetained Product of Pregnancy
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...European Regional Development Fund; HaermonicsTerminatedPostoperative Hemorrhage | Cardiac Tamponade | Cardiac Surgical Procedures | Retained Blood SyndromeNetherlands
-
Assuta Ashdod HospitalRecruitingRetained Products of ConceptionIsrael
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterCompletedRetained Products of ConceptionIsrael
-
Junyu ShiCompletedEsthetics | Angulated Screw-retainedChina
Clinical Trials on Retained Surgical Sponge
-
Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and PharmacyNot yet recruitingAlveolar OsteitisSaudi Arabia
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompletedProsthesis and Implant DentistryEgypt
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompletedSplints | Dental TraumaPakistan
-
Federal University of PelotasUnknownEndodontically Treated TeethBrazil
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
University of ArizonaCompleted
-
Chufan MaUnknown
-
Ji-hua ChenUnknown
-
Universidade Federal de GoiasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompletedMouth, EdentulousBrazil