Massage and Electroacupuncture in Chronic Lumbar Pain

November 9, 2021 updated by: Elena Arnaoutoglou, University of Thessaly

The Effect of Combination of Massage and Electroacupuncture in Patients With Chronic Lumbar Pain. Comparison With the Use of Epidural Analgesia

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare in patients with chronic back pain two therapeutic interventions: a) the combination of massage and electroacupuncture; and b) the application of epidural analgesia in pain, functioning-incompetence, quality of life and mood.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thessaly
      • Larisa, Thessaly, Greece, 41110
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Larisa, Department of Anesthesiology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Larissa, Thessaly, Greece, 41110
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University Hospital of Larissa
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from lumbar pain of benign etiology
  • Age 20 to 65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ages over 65 or below 20 years
  • Neoplasms (benign or malignant etiology)
  • Contagious or infectious disease
  • Dermopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Alcohol or drug use
  • Previous use of epidural analgesia
  • Systemic opioid use
  • Severe heart disease
  • Fever for more than one sessions
  • Allergy to the oil which will be used and its derivatives
  • Thrombi or varicose veins
  • Psychiatric disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: massage-electroacupuncture
Electroacupuncture will be applied throughout the back of the body, upper limbs and ears.Massage will follow the same paths of acupuncture points respectively
The technical characteristics of the device will be: power supply with alkaline batteries (4 pieces), 6V voltage, 6 independently regulated channels, symmetrical biphasic rectangular pulse, excitation from pen type electrode 0.48mA, with high 0.32mA + / -25% & low 0.16mA +/- 25%. Three preset programs to avoid tolerance effect: program 1) 1-6Hz, program 2) 30-100Hz, program 3) 2-100Hz. Low frequencies (2Hz) cause release of endorphins in the brain and enkephalins in the spinal cord, high frequencies (30-100Hz) cause release of dynorphins in the spinal cord, while medium frequencies (15Hz) cause simultaneous release of endorphin and dynorphin. At low frequencies slow diffuse analgesia is achieved with a long duration of analgesic effect, while at high frequencies rapid local analgesic effect of short duration is achieved.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Epidural analgesia
Epidural analgesia will be applied using ropivacaine 0.2%, 5-7% ml and Fentanyl 25 mcg
Ropivacaine (Naropeine) 0.2%, 5-7% ml, and Fentanyl 25mcg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of pain intensity: VAS
Time Frame: 2 years
The Visual Analog Scale scale in its numerical version will be used to evaluate the pain. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a segmented numeric version of the Visual Analog Scale in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain).
2 years
Assessment of functional status and incompetence in both groups
Time Frame: 2 years
The Oswestry & Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (specific for low-back pain) will be used to assess patient functional status and incompetence
2 years
Measurement of health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years
The SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire will be used. It is a generic measure of health status as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. It has three levels: (1) items; (2) eight scales that aggregate 2-10 items each; and (3) two summary measures that aggregate scales. Each item is used in scoring only one scale. Three scales (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain) correlate most highly with the physical component and contribute most to the scoring of the Physical Component Summary measure. The mental component correlates most highly with the Mental Health, Role-Emotional, and Social Functioning scales, which also contribute most to the scoring of the Mental Component Summary measure. Three of the scales (Vitality, General Health, and Social Functioning) have noteworthy correlations with both components. The SF-36 has a verbatim content and response choices.
2 years
Profile of mood states
Time Frame: 2 years
The The Profile of Mood States (acronym: POMS) is a standard validated psychological test. This questionnaire will be used to investigate the mood level. It is a questionnaire investigating the mood level and assessing the impact of a program on the patient mood in the short term. The questionnaire consists of 72 adjectives related to mood, which are grouped into 6 factors. The first five factors are negatively rated (high scores correspond to more negative emotions). The sixth factor is scored positively (high scores correspond to higher vitality). Participants are asked to complete these adjectives in a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "extremely" (4).
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8/19ης/22-11-2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Electroacupuncture device

3
Subscribe