Advanced Endo-therapeutic Procedure : Registry-based Observational Study (AE Registry)

February 28, 2025 updated by: Daniel Von Renteln, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures are of increasing importance to provide minimal invasive treatment for GI diseases. The Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal as tertiary university center is dedicated to increase the availability of therapeutic endoscopy procedures for our population in Montreal and Quebec. Advanced endotherapeutic endoscopy can replace surgery for treatment of benign and malign GI diseases and the aim of this registry-based study is to improve quality related to advanced endotherapeutic endoscopy, as it will provide quantitative means to assess advanced endotherapeutic practice and may identify practices of low quality (possible intervention) or high quality (desired).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures included for this registry-based study are endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), Assessment of Polypectomy quality for colorectal adenomas/polyps, Radio frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC), and Per Oral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). All patients who present for an advanced endotherapeutic endoscopy (ESD, EMR, deep resection, POEM or Zenker treatment) may be included into the registry. Data will be collected prospectively. Data will be recorded on case report forms (CRF), which will then be transferred to an electronic data base (= registry), located on a protected drive.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All eligible participants presenting at the CHUM for an elective advanced therapeutic endoscopy (ESD, EMR, advanced polypectomy, POEM or Zenker treatment) will be approached for this research project.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Presenting for an elective advanced therapeutic endoscopy (ESD, EMR, advanced polypectomy, POEM or Zenker treatment)
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are not capable understanding the trial and patients without consent.
  • Patients with coagulopathy
  • Patient with poor general health defined as an American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than three
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
It has become the standard treatment for superficial tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, either flat or sessile: precancerous lesions and superficial cancers with no or low ganglionic risk. The pre-injection of physiological serum detaches the lesion from the deep plane and allows, with great security, the resection of the mucosa, muscularis mucosae with part of the submucosa, whatever the size and location of the lesion. Compared to other techniques, it allows a histological analysis which dictates the subsequent conduct and the possible need for a complementary surgery.
Advanced therapeutic endoscopy can replace surgery for treatment of benign and malign GI diseases and the aim of this registry-based study to improve quality related to advanced therapeutic endoscopy because the trial will provides a quantitative method to assess advanced therapeutic practise at the CHUM and may identify practices of low quality (possible intervention) or high quality (desired). Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures included for this registry-based study are EMR, ESD, Assessment of polypectomy quality for colorectal adenomas/polyps, Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC), and Per Oral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM).
Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD)
This technique uses submucosal injection and special knives to make a peri-lesional circumferential incision, followed by dissection through the submucosal sub-lesion.
Advanced therapeutic endoscopy can replace surgery for treatment of benign and malign GI diseases and the aim of this registry-based study to improve quality related to advanced therapeutic endoscopy because the trial will provides a quantitative method to assess advanced therapeutic practise at the CHUM and may identify practices of low quality (possible intervention) or high quality (desired). Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures included for this registry-based study are EMR, ESD, Assessment of polypectomy quality for colorectal adenomas/polyps, Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC), and Per Oral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM).
Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC)
This is a mucosal thermo-destruction technique. It uses a generator that delivers a sinusoidal current of high frequency to a probe covered with bipolar electrodes in tight network ensuring a uniform diffusion of the thermal effect. The tissue penetration is superficial on 1mm, intended to eradicate the epithelium up to the muscularis mucosae. Circumferential or focal probes are used as a function of the length of the segment to be treated.
Advanced therapeutic endoscopy can replace surgery for treatment of benign and malign GI diseases and the aim of this registry-based study to improve quality related to advanced therapeutic endoscopy because the trial will provides a quantitative method to assess advanced therapeutic practise at the CHUM and may identify practices of low quality (possible intervention) or high quality (desired). Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures included for this registry-based study are EMR, ESD, Assessment of polypectomy quality for colorectal adenomas/polyps, Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC), and Per Oral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM).
Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)

This technique allows a myotomy on the 8 cm of the lower esophagus extended on the gastric side of the cardia, totally endoscopically, after having approached and tunneled the esophageal submucosa.

Less invasive, it gradually replaces the pneumatic dilatation and surgical myotomy of Heller.

It requires a general anesthesia, an expert operator and a trained nursing team, ESD instruments, carbone dioxide insufflation.

Advanced therapeutic endoscopy can replace surgery for treatment of benign and malign GI diseases and the aim of this registry-based study to improve quality related to advanced therapeutic endoscopy because the trial will provides a quantitative method to assess advanced therapeutic practise at the CHUM and may identify practices of low quality (possible intervention) or high quality (desired). Advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures included for this registry-based study are EMR, ESD, Assessment of polypectomy quality for colorectal adenomas/polyps, Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) and Argon Plasma Ablation (APC), and Per Oral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the incidence of overall severe complications following the procedure
Time Frame: 14 days
Aggregate of all severe adverse events that occur at the time of the procedure (immediate complications) or during 14 days of follow-up. Severe adverse events include bleeding, perforation, and clinical events that require an admission to the hospital.
14 days
Assess the rate of completeness of neoplastic tissue resection
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Assessment of the complete adenoma/Barretts/dysplastic tissue removal, defined as removal of all visible neoplastic tissue at the end of the EMR as assessed by the endoscopist.
6-18 months
Assess the presence of perforation at resection site
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Assessment of the presence of a complete hole, or full-thickness resection of the muscularis propria
6-18 months
Assess the number of patients with post-polypectomy syndrome
Time Frame: 6-18 months
As defined as abdominal pain severe enough to warrant an ER visit or hospital admission and presence of leukocytosis and/or required treatment with antibiotics.
6-18 months
Assess the efficacy of submucosal injectate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Assessment of the solution volume per lesion size (ml/cm2), time of resection.
6-18 months
Assess the number of patients with the need for surgical resection
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Assessment of patients that require surgery for removal of precancerous or cancerous lesions or as result of complications related to the EMR/ESD or endoscopy intervention or for follow-up procedures.
6-18 months
Assess the number of patients with intraprocedural bleeding
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Assessment of immediate bleeding that requires endoscopic intervention to stop the bleeding (e.g. clip placement or snare tip soft coagulation or coagulation grasper).
6-18 months
Severe bleeding complications
Time Frame: 14 days
Immediate or delayed: severe bleeding is defined as the need for hospitalization, transfusion, a repeat endoscopy, surgery, or interventional radiology. An immediate complication is defined as an event at the time of resection or immediately following the endoscopy (before patient has left the endoscopy unit/during immediate post-colonoscopy care). A delayed complication is defined as a bleeding event that occurred after the patient has left the endoscopy unit and within 14 days following the procedure.
14 days
Technical skill of the endoscopist
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Video based assessment of endoscopic resection skills
6-18 months
En-bloc resection rate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The number of cases with complete removal of the targeted lesion in a single piece without fragmentation (ensuring the entire specimen can be assessed for histopathological margins and integrity) out of all the cases.
6-18 months
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The number of cases with a resection with histologically confirmed negative margins (indicating no residual tumor cells at the resection site, both lateral and deep margins are free of neoplastic involvement) out of all cases.
6-18 months
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The rate of reappearance of biopsy-confirmed neoplastic tissue at the original resection site during surveillance endoscopies or detection of cancer in the same area on imaging after the initial curative treatment.
6-18 months
Distant metastasis rate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The rate of development of cancerous spread to distant organs or sites beyond the original tumor location after initial curative treatment.
6-18 months
Lymph node involvement rate
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The rate of detection of cancerous infiltration in regional or distant lymph nodes, identified through imaging, biopsy, or surgical pathology, after initial curative treatment.
6-18 months
Disease progression
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Worsening of the disease, as evidenced by local recurrence, distant metastasis, lymph node involvement, or the appearance of new lesions, after the initial curative treatment.
6-18 months
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The time from the date of initial treatment to the earliest occurrence of disease progression (local recurrence, distant metastasis, lymph node involvement, or new lesion development) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
6-18 months
Cancer-related mortality
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Death directly attributable to the primary cancer or its complications, as determined by clinical assessment, autopsy, or death records.
6-18 months
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Death from any cause, including cancer-related and unrelated causes, during the study period or follow-up after initial curative treatment.
6-18 months
Time to recurrence
Time Frame: 6-18 months
The interval between the date of initial curative treatment and the detection of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
6-18 months
Quality of life (QoL) score
Time Frame: 6-18 months
Patient-reported or clinician-assessed outcomes measuring physical, emotional, and social well-being, as well as symptom burden, during or after treatment. The EQ-5D-5L score will be used, which is a health status measurement that ranges from -0.59 to 1, where 1 indicates excellent health status.
6-18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel von Renteln, MD,PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyp of Colon

Clinical Trials on Polypectomy or myotomy

Subscribe