The Effects of Health Coaching for Frequent Attenders (HCFA)

October 21, 2019 updated by: University of Oulu

The Effectiveness of Health Coaching for Frequent Attenders in the Primary Healthcare

The purpose of the study was to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of health coaching on health-related quality of life, adherence to health regimens, clinical health outcomes and lifestyle factors among frequent attenders in primary healthcare.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The quasi-experimental research method evaluated the effectiveness of health coaching among frequent attenders in primary healthcare. The experimental group received the health coaching and the control group received the usual care. The data were collected with pre- and posttest 12-month follow-up via a questionnaire of FINRISKI2012, RAND-36 and ACDI and clinical health outcomes measured by health-coaching nurses. The data were analyzed by statistical methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had face-to-face visits to the physicians in the local primary healthcare centre at least seven times during a 12-month period
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Able to read and understand Finnish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients´ visits due to pregnancy or delivery
  • Patients´ visits due to serial treatment for the same disease
  • An inability to give informed consent
  • Involving in another study intervention at the same time

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The health coaching group
The experimental group (n = 52) consisted of frequent attenders who had chosen the health-coaching program. The intervention was based on the customized nurse-led health-coaching program. The program consisted of an individual health-coaching nurse, health-coaching sessions and a written action plan according to each participant´s individual needs.
The intervention was based on the customized nurse-led health-coaching program. The program consisted of an individual health-coaching nurse, health-coaching sessions and a written action plan according to each participant´s individual needs.
No Intervention: The control group
The control group consisted of 58 frequent attenders. They, along with the experimental group, received the usual care regarding their health problems from the physicians and nurses at the primary healthcare centres if they needed it. The usual care for frequent attenders included assessment for the need of treatment, physical examination, problem assessment, laboratory and X-ray tests, medical advice and patient support and education during their visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
The health-related quality of life was measured using the validated Finnish version of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36). The 36-item self-report instrument consists of eight separate scales of quality of life: (1) physical functioning (10 items), (2) physical role functioning (four items), (3) emotional role functioning (three items), (4) social role functioning (two items), (5) bodily pain (two items), (6) mental health (five items), (7) energy (four items) and (8) general health (five items). The scores were calculated in a two-step process using the instructions provided by Ware et al. (1994) in the user´s manual. First, all items were scored on a scale from 0 to 100. A higher score defines a better health or function. Second, items in the same scale were averaged together to create the eight scale scores. Scale scores represented the average for all items in the scale.
12 months
Adherence to health regimens
Time Frame: 12 months
Adherence was measured using the Adherence of People with Chronic Disease Instrument (ACDI) (Kyngäs, 1999), a 38-item self-report instrument that has been used to measure adherence to health regimens among people with chronic disease
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lifestyle factors
Time Frame: 12 months
The secondary outcomes were lifestyle factors. The baseline and follow-up questionnaires gathered data on the frequent attenders' alcohol consumption, smoking behaviour, and physical activity. They were based on a customized variant of the national FINRISK 2012 questionnaire
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The clinical health outcomes: Weight
Time Frame: 12 months
Weight in kilograms (kg)
12 months
The clinical health outcomes: Height
Time Frame: 12 months
Height in meters (m)
12 months
The clinical health outcomes: Body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
12 months
The clinical health outcomes: Blood pressure
Time Frame: 12 months
Blood pressure were measured using systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mmHg.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Maria Kääriäinen, Professor, University of Oulu

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Uoulu2014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Behavior

Clinical Trials on The nurse-led health coaching program

Subscribe