Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: Hamstring Versus Quadriceps

October 22, 2019 updated by: FELIX VILCHEZ CAVAZOS, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: Hamstring Versus Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

The use of hamstrings and quadriceps autografts as an alternative option for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has good clinical results: however, both techniques have not been compared among them, which is why this study is intended. The use of quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament repair presents similar or better results compared to autograft of the hamstrings. The objective of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the use of quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring autograft.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methods Institution Patients attending the Orthopedics and Traumatology consult of the Hospital Universitario "Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez" of the Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.

Study design This is a double-blind , prospective, reproducible, comparative and longitudinal clinical trial with specific population.

It is proposed to study 28 patients, being randomly divided into two groups. Inclusion criteria: patients of age between 18 years and 45 years, with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury diagnosed clinically and by magnetic resonance image and with or without associated meniscal injury, without previous reconstruction surgery and with previous informed Consent.

Exclusion criteria: multiligamentous injury and/or diagnosis of moderate or severe ostearthritis, chronic degenerative diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension) and contralateral ACL injury.

Elimination criteria: own initiative to stop participating and those who didn't complete all follow-up appointments.

Procedure Before surgery Detailed Informed Consent is performed to the patient before inclusion to the protocol Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (evaluates the functionality of the knee and classifies them in grades with respect to its functional capacity) IKDC (evaluates knee ligament injuries, based on symptoms, sports activities and knee function) KOOS (evaluates knee sports injuries in young and middle-aged patients) Knee Society Score (pain, range of motion and injured knee stability) Cincinnati Knee Ligament Rating System (CKRS, assesses knee instability in ACL sports injuries) SF-12 (assesses patient's life quality) VAS (a subjective assesment of pain). Surgery The investigators will proceed to perform the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, both by the same surgeon, who will use the same technique in both groups, with the autograft in which the patient will have been randomly assigned.

After surgery all patients will be discharged previous warning signs explanation and several appointments in 2 weeks, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure, for later evaluation scales, mentioned previously Statistical analysis In the sample size calculation, 14 patients per group are included using a mean equivalence formula, with 95% confidence and a power of 80%, estimating an equivalence of more less 2.5 on the Lysholm scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nuevo Leon
      • Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 1-4469
        • Facultad de Medicina UANL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 43 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 years and 45 years
  • Anterior cruciate ligament injury diagnosed clinically and by image (magnetic resonance)
  • Patients with or without associated meniscal injury
  • Patients without previous ACL reconstruction surgery
  • Patients with previous informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with multiligamentous injury
  • Patients who have diagnosis of moderate or severe ostearthritis
  • Patients with chronic degenerative diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension)
  • Patients with contralateral ACL injury.

Elimination criteria

  • Patients that for own initiative, wants to stop participating
  • Patients who didn't complete all follow-up appointments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hamstring
It is the group in which the hamstrings are surgically removed to be used as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The intervention will consist of make an incision on the medial side of the proximal portion of the leg approximately 3 centimeters to dissect by planes until the tendons of the hamstrings are located, which will be removed surgically with specialized instruments and the wound will be closed, for later These tendons be used as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
The intervention will consist of make an incision on the medial side of the proximal portion of the leg approximately 3 centimeters to dissect by planes until the tendons of the hamstrings are located, which will be removed surgically with specialized instruments and the wound will be closed, for later These tendons be used as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
Experimental: Quadriceps tendon
It is the group in which a portion of the quadriceps tendon will be surgically removed for later use as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The intervention consisted in making an incision in the anterior aspect of the distal portion of the thigh of approximately 3 centimeters to dissect by planes until locating the membranous portion of the quadriceps tendon, from which will be removed a portion of surgical way with specialized instruments and the Wound will be closed, for later this tendon to be used as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
orThe intervention consisted in making an incision in the anterior aspect of the distal portion of the thigh of approximately 3 centimeters to dissect by planes until locating the membranous portion of the quadriceps tendon, from which will be removed a portion of surgical way with specialized instruments and the Wound will be closed, for later this tendon to be used as an autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm knee score
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Assessment tool for the results of ACL reconstruction even though it only measures activities of daily living. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IKDC subjective score
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) assess patients with a variety of knee disorders including ligamentous and meniscal injuries as well as patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis. 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
SF-12 physical domain
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)

The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a general health questionnaire that was first published in 1995 as part of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS).

Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. The United States population standard deviation is 10 points. So each 10 increment of 10 points above or below 50, corresponds to one standard deviation away from the average.

up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
SF-12 mental domain
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)

The 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a general health questionnaire that was first published in 1995 as part of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS).

Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. The United States population standard deviation is 10 points. So each 10 increment of 10 points above or below 50, corresponds to one standard deviation away from the average.

up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Flexion (degrees)
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Range of motion in degrees
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Extension (degrees)
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Range of motion in degrees
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Thigh circumference (cm)
Time Frame: up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)
Circumference (cm)
up to 12 months (Baseline and 12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix Vilchez, PhD, UANL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Clinical Trials on Hamstring

3
Subscribe