- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04139616
Prospective Validation of a Pre-Specified Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. (PROMOTE)
Prospective Validation of a Pre-Specified Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. The PROMOTE Study
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The objectives of the study are:
- Feasibility: to validate and determine the applicability of a pre-specified algorithm for managing conduction disturbances in consecutive patients undergoing TAVR, also evaluating the percentage of patients included in each group of the algorithm strategy.
- Efficacy: (i) to evaluate the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation in-hospital and at 30 days compared to that of the year prior to the implementation of the protocol, (ii) to determine the incidence of sudden death at 30 days and at 1-year follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Melanie Côté, MSc
- Phone Number: 2646 418-656-8711
- Email: melanie.cote@criucpq.ulaval.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD
- Phone Number: 418-656-8711
- Email: josep.rodes@criucpq.ulaval.ca
Study Locations
-
-
-
Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
- Recruiting
- IUCPQ
-
Principal Investigator:
- Josep Rodes-Cabau
-
Contact:
- Melanie Cote, MSc
- Phone Number: Rodes-Cabau 4186568711
- Email: melanie.cote@criucpq.ulaval.ca
-
Contact:
- Josep Rodes-Cabau, MD
- Phone Number: 4186568711
- Email: josep.rodes@criucpq.ulaval.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-Patients with aortic valve disease undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior permanent pacemaker
- Failure to provide signed informed consent for data collection
- Impossibility for a follow-up
- Unwillingness to follow the pre-specified strategy for the management of conduction disturbances
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
No ECG changes in patients without pre-existing RBBB
Patients with no new conduction disturbances on the ECG performed immediately post-TAVR (and no episodes of HAVB/CHB during the procedure) have a very low risk of developing HAVB/CHB or any conduction disturbance within the hours-days following the procedure.
In these cases, temporary pacing will be discontinued at the end of the procedure.
However, continuous ECG monitoring until hospital discharge is recommended.
A 12-lead ECG is recommended 24 hours after the procedure.
If no arrhythmic episodes and no ECG changes occur within the 24 hours post-procedure, the patient can be safely discharged (the day after TAVR) with no other monitoring measures in case of otherwise uneventful clinical course (absence of other TAVR related adverse events).
If the patient has to remain hospitalized because of other reasons or TAVR complications, telemetry would be recommended (but no strictly required) for the detection of post-TAVR tachyarrhythmias or late ECG changes.
|
Patients with pre-existing RBBB
A temporary pacing wire is recommended to be maintained for 24 hours (or at least overnight) in all patients with prior RBBB, along with telemetry and daily ECG during the entire hospitalization period (minimum of 2 days).
If any ECG changes occur during the initial 2-3 days, patients can be managed according to the proposed strategy (see management strategies for groups 3 and 5).
If no ECG changes or significant bradyarrythmias occur within the 2-3 days following the procedure, the patient can be discharged.
Considering that the increased risk of life threatening bradyarrhythmias in these patients may extend beyond the hospitalization period, the use of continuous ECG monitoring systems (minimum of 48 hours, up to 4 weeks) may be considered.
|
ECG changes in patients with prior conduction disturbances
Any significant increase in PR or QRS interval will indicate to continuing the temporary pacing for 24 hrs, with daily ECG and telemetry for 1-2 days. If the ECG changes regress in <24 hrs, an earlier removal of the temporary pacing may be considered. Also, a strategy of multiple ECGs during the first 24 hrs may be considered. If ECG changes regress or no further changes occur the patient can be discharged with no PPM at 2 days post-TAVR. If 24 hrs post-TAVR, the PR and QRS interval remain stable but >240 or >150 ms, respectively, and ≥20 ms longer than baseline, maintaining the temporary pacing wire for another 24 hrs is recommended. If no decrease in the PR or QRS duration occurs at day 2, the patient can be considered at risk for more advanced conduction disturbances requiring PPM. The use of an EP study may be a reasonable option for deciding PPM in those patients with prior conduction disturbances with worsening of ECG changes post-TAVR |
New-onset LBBB
Temporary pacing for 24 hrs is recommended, in all patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVR. Earlier removal of the temporary pacing and discharged at day 1 can be considered if LBBB resolves in <24 hrs. If LBBB persists but no further progression of the duration of the QRS or PR interval is observed at day 1, temporary pacing can be discontinued. If no further ECG changes are observed up to day 2-3 post-TAVR, the patient can be discharged. These patients are however at increased risk of HAVB/CHB requiring PPM, and continuous ECG monitoring and/or EP studies may be considered. If further prolongation of the QRS or PR interval is observed at day 1, the temporary pacing is recommended for an additional 24 hrs. If the prolongation of the QRS or PR intervals continues at day 2, evaluation with EP studies or PPM implantation may be considered. The occurrence of any episode of HAVB/CHB following TAVR in a patient with new-onset LBBB will be considered an indication for PPM |
HAVB/CHB during the periprocedural period
Maintaining temporary pacing in patients with procedural persistent HAVB/CHB, and monitoring in intensive care unit are recommended. If HAVB/CHB persists at 24 hrs, PPM is recommended. If HAVB/CHB recovers the day after TAVR, the temporary pacing can be removed and the patient can remain hospitalized for 1 day. If another episode of HAVB/CHB occurs, PPM is recommended. If no other episode of HAVB/CHB occurs, and no other features potentially justifying PPM exist the patient can be discharged. Temporary pacing is recommended for 24 hrs in patients with transient HAVB during the procedure, with telemetry and daily ECG for 2 days. Discontinuing temporary pacing may be considered in those cases with brief episodes of HAVB/CHB and normal ECG. If no recurrent episodes of HAVB/CHB occur, and the patient has no other potential indications for PPM the patient can be discharged at day 2. PPM would be indicated if any recurrent episode of HAVB/CHB occurs during the hospitalization period. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Rate of successful algorithm implementation and percentage of patients in each arm of the pre-specified algorithm
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up
|
1 year follow-up
|
Incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Incidence of sudden death
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Incidence of sudden death
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: Before hospital discharge (between 1 to 30 days)
|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation in each group of the pre-specified algorithm
|
Before hospital discharge (between 1 to 30 days)
|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation in each group of the pre-specified algorithm
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
|
Rate, timing of and reasons for permanent pacemaker implantation in each group of the pre-specified algorithm
|
At 1 year follow-up
|
Rate and timing of sudden death
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
Rate and timing of sudden death in each group of the pre-specified algorithm
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Rate and timing of sudden death
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
Rate and timing of sudden death in each group of the pre-specified algorithm
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Evaluation of arrhythmic events in patients with continuous ECG monitoring
Time Frame: After hospital discharge (up to 1-year)
|
Evaluation of arrhythmic events in patients with continuous ECG monitoring at hospital discharge
|
After hospital discharge (up to 1-year)
|
Evaluation of the rate and timing of permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: After hospital discharge (up to 1-year)
|
After hospital discharge (up to 1-year)
|
|
Rate of PPI among valve types
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
Compare rate of permanent pacemaker implantation among different valve types
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Rate of PPI among valve types
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
Compare rate of permanent pacemaker implantation among different valve types
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Pace dependency and pacing rate
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
Determine the pace dependency and pacing rate in patients with periprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation (overall and in each subgroup of the algorithm)
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Pace dependency and pacing rate
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
Determine the pace dependency and pacing rate in patients with periprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation (overall and in each subgroup of the algorithm)
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Factors associated with sudden death or permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
|
Determine factors associated with sudden death or permanent pacemaker implantation during the follow-up period overall and in each algorithm group
|
At 30-day follow-up
|
Factors associated with sudden death or permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up
|
Determine factors associated with sudden death or permanent pacemaker implantation during the follow-up period overall and in each algorithm group
|
At 1-year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Auffret V, Puri R, Urena M, Chamandi C, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Philippon F, Rodes-Cabau J. Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Circulation. 2017 Sep 12;136(11):1049-1069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028352.
- Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, Brott TG, Cohen DJ, Cutlip DE, van Es GA, Hahn RT, Kirtane AJ, Krucoff MW, Kodali S, Mack MJ, Mehran R, Rodes-Cabau J, Vranckx P, Webb JG, Windecker S, Serruys PW, Leon MB. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2403-18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs255.
- Puri R, Chamandi C, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Rodes-Cabau J. Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation - evolving clinical indications. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Jan;15(1):57-65. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.116. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
- Kolte D, Vlahakes GJ, Palacios IF, Sakhuja R, Passeri JJ, Inglessis I, Elmariah S. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 24;74(12):1532-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.076.
- Auffret V, Lefevre T, Van Belle E, Eltchaninoff H, Iung B, Koning R, Motreff P, Leprince P, Verhoye JP, Manigold T, Souteyrand G, Boulmier D, Joly P, Pinaud F, Himbert D, Collet JP, Rioufol G, Ghostine S, Bar O, Dibie A, Champagnac D, Leroux L, Collet F, Teiger E, Darremont O, Folliguet T, Leclercq F, Lhermusier T, Olhmann P, Huret B, Lorgis L, Drogoul L, Bertrand B, Spaulding C, Quilliet L, Cuisset T, Delomez M, Beygui F, Claudel JP, Hepp A, Jegou A, Gommeaux A, Mirode A, Christiaens L, Christophe C, Cassat C, Metz D, Mangin L, Isaaz K, Jacquemin L, Guyon P, Pouillot C, Makowski S, Bataille V, Rodes-Cabau J, Gilard M, Le Breton H; FRANCE TAVI Investigators. Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in France: FRANCE 2 to FRANCE TAVI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.053.
- van Rosendael PJ, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):2003-2013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx785.
- Cerrato E, Nombela-Franco L, Nazif TM, Eltchaninoff H, Sondergaard L, Ribeiro HB, Barbanti M, Nietlispach F, De Jaegere P, Agostoni P, Trillo R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, D'Ascenzo F, Wendler O, Maluenda G, Chen M, Tamburino C, Macaya C, Leon MB, Rodes-Cabau J. Evaluation of current practices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The WRITTEN (WoRldwIde TAVI ExperieNce) survey. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:640-647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.104. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
- Rodes-Cabau J, Ellenbogen KA, Krahn AD, Latib A, Mack M, Mittal S, Muntane-Carol G, Nazif TM, Sondergaard L, Urena M, Windecker S, Philippon F. Management of Conduction Disturbances Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 27;74(8):1086-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014.
- Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20;74(7):932-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20;74(7):1014-1016.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PROMOTE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
-
Cara Medical LtdRecruitingTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementSpain, Canada, Italy
-
Cara Medical LtdRecruitingTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaRecruitingTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementUnited States
-
Filterlex Medical Ltd.Completed
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesMedtronicRecruitingTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementFrance
-
Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaACompletedTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementGermany
-
BayerJanssen Research & Development, LLCTerminatedTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementBelgium, France, Germany, Spain, United States, Switzerland, Canada, Austria, United Kingdom, Korea, Republic of, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Czechia, Sweden, Norway
-
Action, FranceUnknownTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementFrance
-
Technical University of MunichDeutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen; Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen, GrosshadernCompletedTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementGermany