Anticoagulation Alone Versus Anticoagulation and Aspirin Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions (1:1) (AVATAR)

September 7, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Anticoagulation Alone Versus Anticoagulation and Aspirin Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions - an Open, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial With Two Parallel Arms (1:1)

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate that a single anticoagulant therapy is superior to a combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy on the net clinical benefit estimated at 12 months after a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention (TAVI) according to BARC2 criteria (bleeding complications; Mehran et al 2011) and VARC2 (other complications; Kappetein et al 2012)..

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the following at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after TAVI in both groups:

  1. Mortality (all causes).
  2. Cardiovascular mortality.
  3. The occurrence of myocardial infarction.
  4. The occurrence of stroke.
  5. The occurrence of valve thrombosis.
  6. The occurrence of major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3).
  7. The occurrence of minor bleeding (2 ≤ BARC <3).
  8. Treatment compliance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

170

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Florence LECLERCQ, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Christophe Macia, MD
      • Montpellier cedex 2, France, 34960
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique du Millenaire
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christophe Piot, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gilles Levy, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • François Rivalland, MD
      • Nîmes Cedex 09, France, 30029
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume CAYLA, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laurent Schmutz, MD
      • Nîmes Cedex 1, France, 30032
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Privé Les Franciscaines
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Eric Maupas, MD
      • Perpignan, France, 66000
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique Saint-Pierre
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gabriel Robert, MD
      • Perpignan, France, 66046
        • Recruiting
        • CH de Perpignan - Hôpital Saint Jean
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Frédéric Targosz, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Delphine Delseny, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient or his/her representative must have given free and informed consent and signed the consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 12 months of follow-up
  • The patient underwent a successful transcutaneous implant procedure for an aortic valve
  • The patient required anticoagulant treatment (AVK or DOAC) excepted rivaroxaban the day of inclusion
  • The patient is stable on anticoagulant treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient or his/her representative refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient or his/her representative
  • The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • The patient has a contraindication (or an incompatible drug association) for a treatment used in this study
  • The patient had a coronary stent for less than 12 months
  • The patient does not require treatment with aspirin or any other antiplatelet agent
  • The patient has a history of aspirin allergy
  • High bleeding risk; such as platelets <50,000 / mm3 during screening, Hb <8.5 g / dL, history of intracranial hemorrhage or subdural hematoma, major surgery, parenchymal organ biopsy or severe trauma within 30 days before inclusion, active gastrointestinal ulcer in the last 3 months;
  • History of Stroke in the last 3 months;
  • Moderate or severe liver affection associated with coagulopathy
  • Active infectious endocarditis
  • Active tumor treated at the time of inclusion associated with expected survival less than one year
  • Not following countraindications specific to the molecules used fo the patients receiving DOAC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: vitamin K antagonist or Direct oral anticoagulant treatment

In this group, patients will receive monotherapy via anticoagulant (AVK or DOAC) excepted rivaroxaban; this treatment given corresponds to the anticoagulant treatment the patient was receiving before surgery. A data collection book for monitoring INR values and dates for the next 12 months is given to the patient.

Intervention: anticoagulant

The Vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant treatment will be administered to obtain an International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 as recommended if the treatment is AVK.

The Direct oral anticoagulant treatment : Apixaban 5 mg x2 or 2.5 mg X2, Edoxaban 30 ou 60 mg

Active Comparator: vitamin K antagonist or Direct oral anticoagulant + Aspirin

In this group, patients will receive combination therapy via anticoagulant (AVK or DOAC) and aspirin, whose daily dose is between 75 mg and 100 mg; the anticoagulant treatment administered corresponds to the anticoagulant treatment the patient was receiving before the procedure, monitored and adapted according to current recommendations. A data collection book for monitoring INR values and dates for the next 12 months is given to the patient.

Intervention: anticoagulant Intervention: Aspirin

The Vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant treatment will be administered to obtain an International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 as recommended if the treatment is AVK.

The Direct oral anticoagulant treatment : Apixaban 5 mg x2 or 2.5 mg X2, Edoxaban 30 ou 60 mg

Daily dose is between 75 mg and 100 mg.

Allergic reactions to aspirin may be observed in rare cases. In case of suspicion of allergy, treatment with aspirin is stopped.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite outcome of the following events: death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke all causes, valve thrombosis and hemorrhage ≥ 2 as defined by the VARC 2 (Valve Academic Research Consortium scale).
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All cause death according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 1
month 1
All cause death according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 3
month 3
All cause death according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 6
month 6
All cause death according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 12
month 12
Death due to cardio-vascular causes according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 1
month 1
Death due to cardio-vascular causes according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 3
month 3
Death due to cardio-vascular causes according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 6
month 6
Death due to cardio-vascular causes according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 12
month 12
Myocardial infarction according to VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 1
month 1
Myocardial infarction according to VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 3
month 3
Myocardial infarction according to VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 6
month 6
Myocardial infarction according to VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 12
month 12
Stroke (all cause) according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 1
month 1
Stroke (all cause) according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 3
month 3
Stroke (all cause) according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 6
month 6
Stroke (all cause) according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: month 12
month 12
Valve thrombosis according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: Month 1
Month 1
Valve thrombosis according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Valve thrombosis according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Valve thrombosis according to the VARC 2 criteria
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Major hemorrhage (BARC ≥ 3)
Time Frame: Month 1
Month 1
Major hemorrhage (BARC ≥ 3)
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Major hemorrhage (BARC ≥ 3)
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Major hemorrhage (BARC ≥ 3)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Minor hemorrhage (2 ≤ BARC < 3)
Time Frame: Month 1
Month 1
Minor hemorrhage (2 ≤ BARC < 3)
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Minor hemorrhage (2 ≤ BARC < 3)
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Minor hemorrhage (2 ≤ BARC < 3)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Observance / Modification of treatment (Questionnaire according to Girerd et al. 2001)
Time Frame: Month 1
Month 1
Observance / Modification of treatment (Questionnaire according to Girerd et al. 2001)
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Observance / Modification of treatment (Questionnaire according to Girerd et al. 2001)
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Observance / Modification of treatment (Questionnaire according to Girerd et al. 2001)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Guillaume Cayla, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Clinical Trials on Vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant treatment

3
Subscribe