Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing GVO (ABX-GV)

October 24, 2019 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Injection of Cyanoacrylate for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Gastric Variceal Bleeding

We design a randomized trial to clarify the necessity of antibiotic prophylaxis for the patients chronic liver disease with gastric varices treated by elective GVO.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Gastric varices is not uncommon is patients with chronic liver diseases including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Occurrence of gastric varices (GV) rupture is less often than esophageal varices (EV) but it is characteristic of higher rebleeding rate and mortality and represents an even tougher problem than EV hemorrhage. Endoscopic treatment is an alternative in the management of GV bleeding. Injection sclerotherapy has been applied to arrest GV hemorrhage but it is associated with a high rebleeding rate (50~90%) and thus is regarded as only a temporary hemostatic measure. The advantage of endoscopic variceal ligation is not suggested due to its high rebleeding rate more than 50%. Endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, a so-called "tissue glue",is more effective to treat GV bleeding because of more than 90% successful rate to arrest acute bleeding. The theoretical advantages of tissue glue derives from its unique ability to plug the varix lumen immediately after injection into varices. However, its rebleeding rate is still high around 30~40% and has potential treatment-related morbidity such as embolic and septic complications. Regardless of these disadvantage, the guideline form major international society and Bavenoconsensus recommend GVO as the first treatment of choice for GV bleeding. Therefore how to prevent the potential complications and reduce rebleedingremains an important and practical issue.

With regarding to potential septic infections and rebleeding, the effects of impaired leukocyte function in cirrhotic patients and reduced immunity and increased gut permeability of severe hemorrhagic patients were contributory. In these immunocompromised hosts, when invasive procedure such as GVO is deployed for these patients, the septic complication become un-neglectable, We found (Gastrointest Endosc 2001) more than 1/3 patients undergoing GVO may complicated with bacteremia. Although most of these bacteremia were self-limited, 2% died of sepsis. Moreover, lots of cases were reported due to persistent and recurrent bacterial infections caused by GVO. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been suggested as an integral part for the management of cirrhotic patients with acute varicealbleeding by major international society and Baveno consensus. However, there is no evidence to suggest antibiotic prophylaxis for the patients treated by elective GVO. Therefore we design a randomized trial to clarify the necessity of antibiotic prophylaxis for the patients chronic liver disease with gastric varices treated by elective GVO.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Veteran General Hospital-Taipei
        • Contact:
          • Ming-Chih Hou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with live cirrhosis and/or hepatoma
  2. Aged 20 to 85, who had endoscopy-treatment EV(-)GV(+)or EV<GV

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had a terminal illness of any major organ system,such as heart failure, kindey failure,COPD
  2. Patients recieve antibiotics recently.
  3. Patients suspected infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Antibiotic
Participate will be acepted ertapenem(1g) iv before endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection obliteration
inject from iv drip before endoscopic cyanoacrylateinjection obliteration
Other Names:
  • Invanz
No Intervention: Control
Participate will not be acepted ertapenem(1g) iv before endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection obliteration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevetion of sepsis
Time Frame: 3 years
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce sepsis in Patients Undergoing GVO
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rebleeding rate
Time Frame: 3 years
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce GV rebleeding rate
3 years
Pevention of Refractory bacterial infection
Time Frame: 3 years
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce infection rate in Patients Undergoing GVO
3 years
Mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can decrease mortality in Patients Undergoing GVO
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ming-Chih Hou, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Ertapenem

3
Subscribe