- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04140578
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing GVO (ABX-GV)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Injection of Cyanoacrylate for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Gastric Variceal Bleeding
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Gastric varices is not uncommon is patients with chronic liver diseases including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Occurrence of gastric varices (GV) rupture is less often than esophageal varices (EV) but it is characteristic of higher rebleeding rate and mortality and represents an even tougher problem than EV hemorrhage. Endoscopic treatment is an alternative in the management of GV bleeding. Injection sclerotherapy has been applied to arrest GV hemorrhage but it is associated with a high rebleeding rate (50~90%) and thus is regarded as only a temporary hemostatic measure. The advantage of endoscopic variceal ligation is not suggested due to its high rebleeding rate more than 50%. Endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, a so-called "tissue glue",is more effective to treat GV bleeding because of more than 90% successful rate to arrest acute bleeding. The theoretical advantages of tissue glue derives from its unique ability to plug the varix lumen immediately after injection into varices. However, its rebleeding rate is still high around 30~40% and has potential treatment-related morbidity such as embolic and septic complications. Regardless of these disadvantage, the guideline form major international society and Bavenoconsensus recommend GVO as the first treatment of choice for GV bleeding. Therefore how to prevent the potential complications and reduce rebleedingremains an important and practical issue.
With regarding to potential septic infections and rebleeding, the effects of impaired leukocyte function in cirrhotic patients and reduced immunity and increased gut permeability of severe hemorrhagic patients were contributory. In these immunocompromised hosts, when invasive procedure such as GVO is deployed for these patients, the septic complication become un-neglectable, We found (Gastrointest Endosc 2001) more than 1/3 patients undergoing GVO may complicated with bacteremia. Although most of these bacteremia were self-limited, 2% died of sepsis. Moreover, lots of cases were reported due to persistent and recurrent bacterial infections caused by GVO. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been suggested as an integral part for the management of cirrhotic patients with acute varicealbleeding by major international society and Baveno consensus. However, there is no evidence to suggest antibiotic prophylaxis for the patients treated by elective GVO. Therefore we design a randomized trial to clarify the necessity of antibiotic prophylaxis for the patients chronic liver disease with gastric varices treated by elective GVO.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Recruiting
- Veteran General Hospital-Taipei
-
Contact:
- Ming-Chih Hou
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with live cirrhosis and/or hepatoma
- Aged 20 to 85, who had endoscopy-treatment EV(-)GV(+)or EV<GV
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had a terminal illness of any major organ system,such as heart failure, kindey failure,COPD
- Patients recieve antibiotics recently.
- Patients suspected infection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Antibiotic
Participate will be acepted ertapenem(1g) iv before endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection obliteration
|
inject from iv drip before endoscopic cyanoacrylateinjection obliteration
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Control
Participate will not be acepted ertapenem(1g) iv before endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection obliteration
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Prevetion of sepsis
Time Frame: 3 years
|
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce sepsis in Patients Undergoing GVO
|
3 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rebleeding rate
Time Frame: 3 years
|
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce GV rebleeding rate
|
3 years
|
Pevention of Refractory bacterial infection
Time Frame: 3 years
|
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can reduce infection rate in Patients Undergoing GVO
|
3 years
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
|
If Antibiotic Prophylaxis can decrease mortality in Patients Undergoing GVO
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ming-Chih Hou, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-01-027C
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityRecruitingSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruitingSepsis-associated EncephalopathyEgypt
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); New York Presbyterian Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Infection | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ertapenem
-
University Medical Center GroningenCompleted
-
University of MichiganCompletedAcute Kidney FailureUnited States
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCUnknown
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompleted
-
Hartford HospitalMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedHealthyUnited States
-
Klinikum Hanover-Siloah HospitalUnknownAcute Disease | Diverticulitis, ColonicGermany
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityUnknownPatients With Urosepis and Received Ertapenem for TreatmentThailand
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompleted
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedPneumonia | Urinary Tract Infection | Infection