Spacer Graft Study

January 19, 2024 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center

Study Protocol for Comparison of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair With Hard Palate, Autologous Ear Cartilage, and Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix Spacer Grafts

To determine which of three types of spacer grafts (hard palate vs autologous ear cartilage vs Enduragen) are the most effective in lower eyelid retraction repair outcomes as measured by MRD2 (margin to reflex distance 2)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Lower eyelid retraction is a common eyelid malposition, typically caused by thyroid eye disease, excessive resection of skin in a cosmetic lower eyelid blepharoplasty, vertical rectus muscle recession, facial nerve paralysis, or a normal anatomical variant.[1] When the lower eyelid is displaced inferiorly, exposing sclera between the limbus and the eyelid margin, symptoms can vary from ocular irritation and discomfort to vision threatening corneal decompensation. If medical management does not suffice, surgery is indicated.

Although lower eyelid retractor lysis alone has been described, supporting material (spacer graft) placed to augment the posterior lamella is generally required for more effective elevation of the eyelid.[2] Various materials have been utilized, including autologous auricular cartilage, bovine acellular dermal matrix, porcine acellular dermal matrix, hard palate mucosa, dermis and dermis fat grafts. Previous studies on acellular dermal matrix use in lower eyelid retraction repair consist of retrospective efficacy studies with only 2 comparative studies. However, conflicting results raised doubt as to which material was superior. In addition, a prospective, randomized comparative study of spacer grafts used for lower eyelid retraction repair was done comparing autologous auricular cartilage, porcine acellular dermal matrix, and bovine acellular dermal matrix. The results yielded no statistically significant difference in surgical outcomes and complications.[3]. As of now, surgery with any of the spacer grafts, including autologous hard palate, is accepted as standard of care. [4] This study is designed to determine whether using hard palate as a spacer graft will have statistically significant different surgical outcomes and complications as compared to autologous ear cartilage and porcine acellular dermal matrix spacer grafts. Although studied separately, this has not been studied before in a prospective randomized manner and may prove to demonstrate improved surgical results and decreased complications. This can guide future choice of spacer graft used in lower eyelid retraction repair surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Recruiting
        • Montefiore Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be included if they undergo lower eyelid retraction repair requiring a spacer graft between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2022 .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they are younger than 18 years old, required concurrent surgeries (e.g., midface lift or full thickness skin graft) or required further surgeries on the operated eyelid within the 6 months postoperatively. In addition, patients with less than 1-month follow up will be excluded from all outcome analysis and those without postoperative 6-month data will be excluded from the postoperative month 6 MRD2 calculation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hard Palate
Some patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will be randomized to use hard palate
In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will randomly be assigned via a randomization web-site to receive 1 of 3 spacer grafts: hard palate, autologous auricular cartilage, and porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen). Both the patient and the surgeon will know which of the three possible grafts are being used.
Active Comparator: Autologous Ear Cartilage
Some patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will be randomized to use autologous ear cartilage
In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will randomly be assigned via a randomization web-site to receive 1 of 3 spacer grafts: hard palate, autologous auricular cartilage, and porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen). Both the patient and the surgeon will know which of the three possible grafts are being used.
Active Comparator: Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix
Some patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will be randomized to use porcine acellular dermal matrix
In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients who will already be undergoing lower eyelid retraction repair with a spacer graft will randomly be assigned via a randomization web-site to receive 1 of 3 spacer grafts: hard palate, autologous auricular cartilage, and porcine acellular dermal matrix (Enduragen). Both the patient and the surgeon will know which of the three possible grafts are being used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRD2 (margin to reflex distance 2)
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Analyzing the effectiveness of the spacer grafts with respect to lower eyelid retraction repair. MRD2 is the distance in millimeters between the pupillary light reflex and the lower eyelid margin with the patient looking at a light reflex in primary gaze.
6 months post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-Surgical Complications
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Conjunctival injection and eyelid swelling will be graded by the examiner on a scale of 0 to 10. Tearing, itching, discomfort will be graded by the patient on a scale of 0 to 10 both pre-operatively and post-operatively.
6 months post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Barmettler, MD, Director of Oculoplastic Surgery Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-10410

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eyelid Diseases

Clinical Trials on Spacer Graft

3
Subscribe