Functional Improvement of Coronary Artery Narrowing by Cholesterol Reduction With a PCSK9 Antibody (FITTER)

July 16, 2024 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Functional Improvement of Non-infarcT relaTed Coronary Artery Stenosis by Extensive LDL-C Reduction With a PCSK9 Antibody

In a large number of patients who experienced an acute coronary syndrome, multiple narrowings of the coronary arteries are identified. Mechanical treatment of the infarct related artery is indisputable, yet mechanical treatment of other bystander lesions in non-infarct related arteries is controversial.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol can speed up the formation of these coronary artery narrowings, and can increase the risk of a second event.

The investigators want to investigate if treating patients with the new cholesterol-lowering drug evolocumab in addition to statin therapy ameliorates blood flow and reduces atherosclerotic plaque size compared with placebo. Improved blood flow and a reduction of plaque size could prevent the need for additional stenting or surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In a large number of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) multivessel disease is identified. Mechanical treatment of the infarct related artery (IRA) is indisputable, yet mechanical treatment of other bystander lesions in non-infarct related arteries (non-IRAs) is controversial. Some randomized studies have favored preventive complete revascularization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) over conservative medical treatment with deferred percutaneous intervention (PCI). Yet patient selection and medical treatment in the conservative medical treatment groups were suboptimal.

Revascularization of lesions in the non-IRA can be guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR). In current practice, a value of 0.80 or lower is often used to mark a functionally significant stenosis at a stabilized moment after initial hyperemic response. However, recent evidence suggests that hyperemic response to adenosine is impaired in patients with ACS, which could underestimate how flow-limiting a non-culprit lesion is as measured by FFR. A large patient-level meta-analysis of multiple FFR trials showed that FFR values below 0.67 most evidently identify those at risk of MI or death. Thus, in patients with values above 0.67, mechanical revascularization has less apparent benefit as compared to patients with values below 0.67. The threshold of 0.67 could be a lower safety margin applied for non-IRA lesions, with percutaneous intervention (PCI) as treatment. For values between 0.67 and 0.85, medical treatment could be optimized using the latest generation LDL-C lowering agents on top of current high-intensity statin therapy (HIST) before directly stenting the lesion.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have shown to induce regression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume (PV) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). As high-risk lesions with large plaque burden (PB) and lipid content are frequently present in ACS, a rapid response on PB and PV can be expected when starting PCSK9-inhibitors on top of HIST. In addition to plaque size, plaque morphology is important in determining residual risk. Lipid-rich plaques have recently again shown to increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events. Lipid rich plaque can be identified using Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS). The amount of lipid is represented in the lipid core burden index (LCBI) and is an independent risk factor for future coronary events. A recent study demonstrated the effect on plaque composition in 52 weeks. In this study, an effect in 12 weeks will be evaluated as a potential independent explanation of reduced events in long-term clinical follow-up studies.The change in plaque volume might be closely related to a change in FFR.

Furthermore, it is now well-appreciated that an ACS, a result of atherosclerotic plaque destabilization, initiates a temporary acceleration of atherogenesis in itself. An ACS induces rapid activation of the bone marrow hematopoietic stem- and progenitor cells resulting in monocytosis and activation of innate immune cells, which subsequently accelerate atherosclerosis progression throughout the body. Hypercholesterolemia also activates the innate immune system bone marrow progenitors resulting in long-term activation of the innate immune system. In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), PCSK9 treatment reduced monocyte CCR2 expression and ex-vivo migratory capacity. Therefore, in the first weeks after an ACS occurred, there is an optimal time window for preventing atherosclerosis progression by powerful lowering of plasma cholesterol.

This pharmaco-invasive strategy with a combination of HIST and a PCSK9-inhibitor could possibly prevent mechanical revascularization (PCI or CABG) in a large cohort of patients. Evolocumab was the first PCSK9-inhibitor approved for clinical use in 2015 for lowering of LDL-C as an adjunct to diet in patients with FH, primary hypercholesterolemia and in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Evolocumab has been evaluated in several large scale studies as GLAGOV (N = 968) and FOURIER (N= 27564) on surrogate and clinical endpoints with important benefits and established safety and tolerability.

In this study we want to investigate the effect of maximal LDL-C reduction by evolocumab in addition to HIST compared to placebo on functional impairment of non-IRA lesions, measured by FFR, and the change in NIRS derived lipid core burden index at the 4mm maximal segment (MaxLCBI4mm) from baseline to follow-up in the non-IRA. Secondly, we want to evaluate the change in multiple plaque characteristics, measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Finally, we will investigate the change in microvascular function, change in pro-inflammatory monocyte phenotype and explore correlations between on treatment LDL-C, LCBI, plaque characteristics and FFR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (all):

  • ACS with PCI of infarct related artery
  • MVD
  • FFR of non-IRA lesion 0.67 - 0.85
  • 18 years old at screening

Exclusion Criteria (any):

Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

  • Prior coronary artery bypass graft
  • Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%
  • Untreated functional left main stem stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.80)
  • Contra-indication for antithrombotic therapy according to ESC guidelines
  • Non-IRA stenosis not amenable for PCI treatment (operator's decision)
  • Complicated IRA treatment, with one or more of the following:
  • Extravasation
  • Permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1)
  • Inability to implant a stent
  • Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery in the follow-up period.
  • Severe kidney disease defined as an eGFR < 30 ml/min.
  • Known severe liver disease defined as Child-Pugh score of 10-15.
  • Female subject is pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or planning to breastfeed during treatment and for an additional 15 weeks after the last dose of investigational product. Females of childbearing potential should only be included in the study after a confirmed menstrual period and a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential unwilling to use 1 acceptable method of effective contraception during treatment and for an additional 15 weeks after the last dose of investigational product.
  • Female subject who has not used an acceptable method(s) of birth control for at least 1 month prior to screening, unless the female subject is sterilized or postmenopausal.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment arm
Evolocumab (140mg) will be administered subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) on day 1 through week 12 with personal injectors, containing 1 mL deliverable volume of 140 mg/mL Evolocumab.
Evolocumab (also known as Repatha, formerly referred to as AMG 145) is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) that specifically binds to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) preventing its interaction with the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). The inhibition of PCSK9 by evolocumab leads to increased LDLR expression and subsequent decreased circulating concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
Other Names:
  • Repatha
  • AMG145
Placebo Comparator: Comparator arm
Placebo will be administered subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) on day 1 through week 12 with personal injectors, containing 1 mL deliverable volume of placebo.
Matching placebo
Other Names:
  • Placebo injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in FFR from baseline to follow-up in non-IRA lesions.
Time Frame: FFR will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Primary physiological endpoint
FFR will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Change in lipid core burden index at the 4mm maximal segment (MaxLCBI4mm) from baseline to follow-up of the non-IRA.
Time Frame: LCBI will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Primary imaging endpoint
LCBI will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in percent atheroma volume (PAV, %)
Time Frame: IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Secondary invasive imaging endpoint (measured by IVUS)
IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
The change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV, mm3)
Time Frame: IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Secondary invasive imaging endpoint (measured by IVUS)
IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
The change in maximum plaque burden (PB, %)
Time Frame: IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Secondary invasive imaging endpoint (measured by IVUS)
IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
The change in minimum luminal area (MLA, mm2)
Time Frame: IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Secondary invasive imaging endpoint (measured by IVUS)
IVUS will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The correlations between achieved on-treatment LDL-C, the change in FFR, the change in LCBI and the change in PAV
Time Frame: This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
Exploratory endpoint
This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
The correlation between baseline NIRS derived MaxLCBI4mm and change in FFR of the non-IRA.
Time Frame: This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
Exploratory endpoint
This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
The correlation between change in IVUS-derived plaque characteristics and change in FFR of the non-IRA
Time Frame: This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
Exploratory endpoint
This endpoint is measured at the last study visit (12 weeks)
Change of microvascular resistance as measured by CFR and IMR
Time Frame: CFR/IMR will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
Exploratory endpoint
CFR/IMR will be assessed at baseline (0 weeks) and at the last follow-up visit (12 weeks)
The correlation between LDL-C reduction and reduction of pro-inflammatory monocyte phenotypes.
Time Frame: Blood for monocyte phenotyping will be drawn at baseline, week 4 and week 12
Exploratory endpoint
Blood for monocyte phenotyping will be drawn at baseline, week 4 and week 12
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: This endpoint is measured during the study, and terminates 30 days after the participant received the last dose of study medication.
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE): composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI and any revascularization, unplanned ischemia driven PCI of the target lesion, any unplanned ischemia driven PCI in the total study population. Furthermore, all (serious) adverse events will be listed.
This endpoint is measured during the study, and terminates 30 days after the participant received the last dose of study medication.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Jan van Geuns, MD, PhD, robertjan.vangeuns@radboudumc.nl

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe