- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04143698
Reusable Versus Disposable Duodenoscopes for ERCP
Randomized Trial Comparing Reusable and Disposable Duodenoscopes for ERCP
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Given the recent reports on infection outbreaks, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), caused by contaminated duodenoscopes used at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a disposable (single-use) duodenoscope (Exalt, Single-Use Duodenoscope, Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA) has been developed to circumvent this issue. However, there are currently no data on the technical features and outcomes of disposable duodenoscopes, in comparison with reusable duodenoscopes.
The aim of this randomized trial is therefore to evaluate the technical aspects of disposable duodenoscopes and to compare the technical outcomes between the two duodenoscope types.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
- AdventHealth Orlando
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Patients with native papilla
- Requiring an ERCP procedure for biliary or pancreatic duct disorder, based on clinical symptoms and radiological findings at computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 years old
- Unable to obtain informed consent
- Pregnancy
- Altered upper gastrointestinal surgical anatomy
- Patients with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheters
- Prior history of ERCP
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Disposable (single-use) duodenoscope
This group will be using the disposable (single-use) duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
|
The duodenoscope will be passed to the duodenum in the standard fashion.
Once the papilla has been identified in the duodenum, cannulation of the desired duct will be performed in the standard fashion, with the type of accessories used left to the discretion of the individual endoscopist performing the procedure.
If cannulation is considered difficult, advanced cannulation techniques can be used per standard of care at the discretion of the individual endoscopist.
The types of accessories used will be left to the discretion of the individual endoscopist and will be dependent on procedure indication and personal preference.
Cross-over to the alternate duodenoscope type can be performed at any time if the desired technical maneuver cannot be performed with the designated duodenoscope.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Reusable duodenoscope
This group will be using the reusable duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
|
The duodenoscope will be passed to the duodenum in the standard fashion.
Once the papilla has been identified in the duodenum, cannulation of the desired duct will be performed in the standard fashion, with the type of accessories used left to the discretion of the individual endoscopist performing the procedure.
If cannulation is considered difficult, advanced cannulation techniques can be used per standard of care at the discretion of the individual endoscopist.
The types of accessories used will be left to the discretion of the individual endoscopist and will be dependent on procedure indication and personal preference.
Cross-over to the alternate duodenoscope type can be performed at any time if the desired technical maneuver cannot be performed with the designated duodenoscope.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cannulation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The ease of cannulation of the desired duct (biliary or pancreatic), as measured by the total number of cannulation attempts to achieve successful cannulation of the desired duct.
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of passage of duodenoscope and imaging and mechanical function of the duodenoscope
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Ease of maneuverability of the duodenoscope to reach the major papilla, the imaging and mechanical function of the duodenoscope, measured on a five point scale with 1 being the easiest and 5 being the most difficult.
|
1 day
|
|
Ease of completion of interventions
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Ease of completion of each step of the ERCP procedure, measured on a 5 point scale with 1 being the easiest and 5 being the most difficult.
|
1 day
|
|
Rate of use of advanced cannulation techniques
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Need for use of advanced cannulation techniques
|
1 day
|
|
Rate of cross-over
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Rate of cross-over to the alternate duodenoscope for completion of the procedure
|
1 day
|
|
Time taken for cannulation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Time taken for cannulation
|
1 day
|
|
Total duration of the procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Total duration of the procedure
|
1 day
|
|
Rate of adverse events
Time Frame: 7 days and 30 days
|
Assessment of AEs and SAEs
|
7 days and 30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Dumonceau JM, Giovannini M, Gyokeres T, Hafner M, Halttunen J, Hassan C, Lopes L, Papanikolaou IS, Tham TC, Tringali A, van Hooft J, Williams EJ. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
- Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J, Vargo J, Baron T, Tarnasky P, Schutz S, Jacobson B, Bott C, Petersen B. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
- Rauwers AW, Voor In 't Holt AF, Buijs JG, de Groot W, Hansen BE, Bruno MJ, Vos MC. High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study. Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1637-1645. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315082. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
- Kim S, Russell D, Mohamadnejad M, Makker J, Sedarat A, Watson RR, Yang S, Hemarajata P, Humphries R, Rubin Z, Muthusamy VR. Risk factors associated with the transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae via contaminated duodenoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.790. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
- Alrabaa SF, Nguyen P, Sanderson R, Baluch A, Sandin RL, Kelker D, Karlapalem C, Thompson P, Sams K, Martin S, Montero J, Greene JN. Early identification and control of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, originating from contaminated endoscopic equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jun;41(6):562-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
- Epstein L, Hunter JC, Arwady MA, Tsai V, Stein L, Gribogiannis M, Frias M, Guh AY, Laufer AS, Black S, Pacilli M, Moulton-Meissner H, Rasheed JK, Avillan JJ, Kitchel B, Limbago BM, MacCannell D, Lonsway D, Noble-Wang J, Conway J, Conover C, Vernon M, Kallen AJ. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes. JAMA. 2014 Oct 8;312(14):1447-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12720.
- Sahar N, La Selva D, Gluck M, Gan SI, Irani S, Larsen M, Ross AS, Kozarek RA. The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital. Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):448-453. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6317-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
- Liao WC, Angsuwatcharakon P, Isayama H, Dhir V, Devereaux B, Khor CJ, Ponnudurai R, Lakhtakia S, Lee DK, Ratanachu-Ek T, Yasuda I, Dy FT, Ho SH, Makmun D, Liang HL, Draganov PV, Rerknimitr R, Wang HP. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Oct 5. No abstract available.
- Bassi M, Luigiano C, Ghersi S, Fabbri C, Gibiino G, Balzani L, Iabichino G, Tringali A, Manta R, Mutignani M, Cennamo V. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the use of touch versus no-touch guidewire technique for deep biliary cannulation: the TNT study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 18.
- Hwang JC, Yoo BM, Yang MJ, Lee YK, Lee JY, Lim K, Noh CK, Cho HJ, Kim SS, Kim JH. A prospective randomized study of loop-tip versus straight-tip guidewire in wire-guided biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1708-1713. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5851-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
- Bassan MS, Sundaralingam P, Fanning SB, Lau J, Menon J, Ong E, Rerknimitr R, Seo DW, Teo EK, Wang HP, Reddy DN, Goh KL, Bourke MJ. The impact of wire caliber on ERCP outcomes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 0.025-inch and 0.035-inch guidewires. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1454-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.037. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
- Buxbaum J, Leonor P, Tung J, Lane C, Sahakian A, Laine L. Randomized Trial of Endoscopist-Controlled vs. Assistant-Controlled Wire-Guided Cannulation of the Bile Duct. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1841-1847. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial. Gut. 2021 May;70(5):838-844. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321836. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1388902
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
-
Beijing Friendship HospitalCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyChina
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeUnited States
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyUnited States, Netherlands
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyFinland
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyItaly
-
Kliniken Ludwigsburg-Bietigheim gGmbHNot yet recruitingCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
-
Olympus Europe SE & Co. KGCompletedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeBelgium, Germany, Norway
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyUnited States
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalTurku University Hospital; Oulu University HospitalCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyFinland
-
University Hospital, LinkoepingCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographySweden
Clinical Trials on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography , GallstoneChina
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedEndoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography | ERCP-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Interval | Number of Preoperative ERCPs | Stone Extraction Status in ERCP Procedures | Biliary Stents | Mechanical LithotripsyTurkey
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Gallbladder Carcinoma | Bile Duct CarcinomaUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterUnknownMalignant Biliary ObstructionKorea, Republic of
-
University of FloridaCompletedBenign Biliary StricturesUnited States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesUnknown
-
University Hospital OlomoucPalacky UniversityRecruitingEndoscopy | Klatskin Tumor | Diagnosis | Biliary Stricture | Cholangiocarcinoma, Perihilar | Cholangiocarcinoma, Extrahepatic | Malignant Biliary Stricture | Cholangiocarcinoma of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct | Raman SpectroscopyCzechia
-
Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalSpanish Society of Digestive EndoscopyNot yet recruitingCholangiocarcinoma | Choledocholithiasis | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Sclerosing Cholangitis | Biliary Fistula | Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis
-
AdventHealthCompletedBile Duct Diseases | Gallstone | Bile Duct ObstructionUnited States