Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Different Electrotherapy Agents on Central Sensitization

November 4, 2019 updated by: Şahide Eda Almaz, Turkish League Against Rheumatism

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Interferential Currents (IFC) on Central Sensitization in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), interferential currents (IFCs) and sham devices in improving central sensitization (CS) findings, including pressure pain thresholds, pain catastrophizing, depression, and kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Knee OA, which is the most frequently encountered type of OA is a leading cause of disability and chronic pain. CS is as important as nociceptive component in the pathogenesis of OA-related pain. Therefore, the necessary interventions for CS should be also considered when deciding the treatment protocol.TENS and IFC have been safely and commonly employed in the conservative treatment of knee OA. However, there are limited and inconsistent data concerning the impact of these modalities on CS component of pain.Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether these agents are effective on CS and they are superior to each other.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Hatice Bodur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

40 to 75 years of age, Having bilateral knee OA radiologically with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 2 or 3.

Reporting knee pain of more than 3 on the visual analog scale (VAS) over the last 6 months Being unfamiliar with TENS and IFC use

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having the history of any contraindication for electrotherapy (pacemakers, epilepsy, dermatological conditions, abnormal sensation in the knees, pregnancy),
  2. Having a knee surgery or intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection within 6 months.
  3. Taking any drugs acting on the nervous system such as anticonvulsants, antidepressants, myorelaxants, or opioid drugs in the study period.
  4. Having fibromyalgia, inflammatory rheumatologic, severe psychological disorders -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active TENS Group
Ten sessions of active conventional TENS and hydrocollator hot-pack.
Electrodes are placed around painful regions determined by the patient as patients are in the sitting position with the knees extended. The device is set at pulse duration of 50 to 80 μs; pulse frequency of 50 to 100 Hz; low-intensity (paraesthesia, not painful). The patient wears TENS for a 20-minute duration for each knee.
Other Names:
  • TENS
The hot-pack (at a surface temperature of almost 42 °C) is administered on knees while patients are in sitting position with the knees extended. Every session includes 20 minutes of hot-pack for each knee.
Active Comparator: Active IFC Group
Ten sessions of active interferential current and hydrocollator hot-pack.
The hot-pack (at a surface temperature of almost 42 °C) is administered on knees while patients are in sitting position with the knees extended. Every session includes 20 minutes of hot-pack for each knee.
Electrodes are placed diagonally around the painful areas defined by the patient, with the patient in the sitting position with the knees extended. The device is set at carrier frequency 4000 Hz, amplitude modulated frequency (AMF) 100 Hz, scanning frequency 50 Hz, scanning mode 1: 1 s. The patient wears ICF for a 20-minute duration for each knee.
Other Names:
  • IFC
Sham Comparator: Sham TENS Group
Ten sessions of sham TENS and hydrocollator hot-pack.
The hot-pack (at a surface temperature of almost 42 °C) is administered on knees while patients are in sitting position with the knees extended. Every session includes 20 minutes of hot-pack for each knee.
Electrodes are placed around painful regions determined by the patient as patients are in the sitting position with the knees extended.TENS unit in place but not turned on.The patient wears TENS for a 20-minute duration for each knee.
Other Names:
  • Sham TENS
Sham Comparator: Sham IFC Group
Ten sessions of sham IFC and hydrocollator hot-pack.
The hot-pack (at a surface temperature of almost 42 °C) is administered on knees while patients are in sitting position with the knees extended. Every session includes 20 minutes of hot-pack for each knee.
Electrodes are placed diagonally around the painful areas defined by the patient, with the patient in the sitting position with the knees extended. IFC unit in place but not turned on.The patient wears ICF for a 20-minute duration for each knee.
Other Names:
  • Sham IFC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure-pain thresholds
Time Frame: Change from baseline pressure-pain thresholds at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Pressure pain thresholds is measured on the knee (M. Vastus Medialis) and on the upper part of the homolateral arm (lateral part of M. Deltoideus, 10 cm below acromion) using a pressure algometer. The pressure is raised at a rate of almost 1 kg/s, until the patient first notifies that the pressure sensation changes to a pain sensation.
Change from baseline pressure-pain thresholds at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Change from baseline kinesiophobia scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Tampa Scale contains 17 parts that measure anxiety and fear related to movement. The total score ranges between 17-68 points. Higher scores represent higher grades of kinesiophobia.
Change from baseline kinesiophobia scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline BDI scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks.
Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item questionnaire that examines the characteristic symptoms of depression.
Change from baseline BDI scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks.
Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline PCS scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks.
PCS consists of 13 items in three subscales (rumination, helplessness, and magnification). Higher final score indicates more catastrophic thinking related to pain.
Change from baseline PCS scores at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: Baseline
years
Baseline
Gender
Time Frame: Baseline
female/male
Baseline
Height
Time Frame: Baseline
centimeter (cm)
Baseline
Weight
Time Frame: Baseline
kilogram (kg)
Baseline
Comorbidity
Time Frame: Baseline
self reported
Baseline
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
VAS ranging levels from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain).
Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Index.
Time Frame: Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks

There are three subscales with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score.

Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Timed up and go test is used to assess mobility which recorded the time of rising from a back-rest chair, walking at a normal pace 3 meters, turning, walking back to the chair, and sitting recumbently. In one minute durations, each participant will perform the test three times and this time will be recorded in seconds.
Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks
The participant is asked to sit-to-stand action from a standard chair five times as quickly as possible, and the time taken to complete is recorded.
Change from baseline, at 2 weeks and at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Şahide E Almaz, MD, Turkish League Against Rheumatism
  • Study Director: Hatice Bodur, Professor, Turkish League Against Rheumatism
  • Study Chair: Aslı Çalışkan Uçkun, MD, Turkish League Against Rheumatism
  • Study Chair: Filiz Acar Sivas, Professor, Turkish League Against Rheumatism
  • Study Chair: Fatma G Yurdakul, MD, Turkish League Against Rheumatism

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All the collected data will be shared with investigators of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Subscribe