Genome Sequencing Strategies for Genetics Diagnosis of Patients With Intellectual Disability (DEFIDIAG)

Etude Pilote Des différentes stratégies de séquençage Haut débit du génome Pour le Diagnostic génétique Des Patients Atteints de déficience Intellectuelle

Introduction : Intellectual Disability (ID) is the most common cause of referral in the pediatric genetic centers and is characterized by an extreme genetic heterogeneity corresponding to a myriad of rare diseases that complicates the identification of ID's.

Overall today in France, for non-syndromic ID affected patients, the Fra-X detection, the chromosomal microarray analysis and Gene Panel Strategy of 44 ID selected genes leads to a global diagnostic yield for 1/3 patients leaving 2/3 of patients still with no diagnosis.

The advent, and burst, of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has clearly revolutionized the approaches to diagnosis and research in the field of rare diseases at an international. That's why the main hypothesis of DEFIDIAG is that Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) could allow to improve the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness for French patients with ID.

Objective : The main objective of this study is to compare ther percentage of genetic causal diagnosis identified in ID patients by performing trio WGS analysis vs the use of the current French reference strategy (ACPA, X-Fra, DI 44).

Methods and design : This is a prospective study. The investigators expect to include 1275 index case with his/her 2 biological unaffected parents.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3825

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49000
        • CHU d'Angers
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU Bordeaux
      • Bron, France
        • Hospices Civil de Lyon
      • Dijon, France
        • CHU Dijon
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • CHU de Grenoble-Alpes
      • Lille, France
        • CHRU Lille
      • Marseille, France
        • Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Marseille
      • Montpellier, France
        • CHU Montpellier
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU Nantes
      • Paris, France
        • Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière
      • Paris, France
        • Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris - Hôpital Necker - Enfants malades
      • Rennes, France
        • CHU Rennes
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU Rouen
      • Strasbourg, France
        • CHU Strasbourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

  1. Inclusion criteria for children or adults with ID of unknown etiology (index case)

    In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all the following criteria:

    • Age:

      1. Between 0 and 5 years with stringent criteria (severe delayed development in terms of motor skills, language, and/or sociability) OR
      2. ≥ 6 years: patients with ID, whatever the severity (but with proven ID by ad hoc neuropsychological testing) and the associated manifestations
    • Without any obvious diagnosis identified during a genetic consultation in one of the participating center (i.e., an obvious syndrome with ID with well-known molecular diagnosis is excluded);
    • Provision of signed and dated of "participant" consent form;
    • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.

    Patient with a social security in compliance with the French law (Provisions relating to research involving the human person provided for in Articles L 1121-1 et seq. of the French Public Health Code).

  2. Inclusion criteria for biological parents

    - Provision of signed and dated of both parents consent form.

  3. Non-inclusion criteria

    • An individual, who presents any condition which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the subject to participate in the trial or which would jeopardize compliance with the protocol, will not be eligible;
    • Patients with isolated learning disabilities;
    • One or both parents with ID;
    • Parent placed under judicial protection (tutelle, curatelle et sauvegarde de justice) ;
    • Patient with a known etiological diagnosis (non-genetic, previously proven Fra-X syndrome, know chromosomal anomaly, known pathogenic or probably pathogenic variant identified in an ID gene by any technique).
    • For patient concerning by biobank project: hypersensitivity to local anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary study endpoint is the identification of a causal diagnosis of ID defined as the identification of one class 4 or 5 variant (or two in case of autosomal recessive inheritance) that explains the symptoms presented by the patient. In addition variants classified as 3+, anticipated to become future 4 will be recorded. Specific analysis and follow up of the variant classified as 3+ (i.e. with a high probability of pathogenicity) will be done after the end of the protocol to determine the class 3+ to class 4-5 switch proportion and to describe the new genes/mechanisms involved in ID and revealed by DEFIDIAG.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Causal structural change
Time Frame: 12 months

Identification of causal structural changes (CNV, translocation, inversion) in the first investigation population (confirmed during the MDM for the WGS strategies)

The clinical characteristics of patients and the diagnostic yield at each step of the incremental selection within WGS analyses (44GPS, OMIMOME, WES, WGS) according to the results of the preceding step as well as according to the results of chromosomal microarray analysis and 44GPS will also be parameters of interest in the whole population.

12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: 24 months
The cost-effectiveness endpoint will be an efficiency criterion based on the estimation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, expressed in terms of cost per additional positive diagnosis.
24 months
Mean cost of wavering diagnostic research
Time Frame: 24 months
Estimation of the cost of wavering diagnostic research
24 months
Percentage of at least one modification in medical, medico-social, rehabilitative and psychological follow-up
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Number and type of secondary data
Time Frame: 12 months
The number and type of SFs (class 4 or 5 mutation(s)) identified in the parents that specifically consent to this study will be recorded in a specific report. The outcome will be defined by the percentage of SFs in the studied population and the number and type of medical consequences following their identification.
12 months
Median time and type of skills required for analyzing genetic data and for genetic confirmation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Median time to obtain results
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hélène DOLLFUS, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intellectual Disability

Clinical Trials on Trio Whole Genome Sequencing

3
Subscribe