- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05857592
Improving the Cognitive Accessibility of Self-reports for People With ID
Adapting Self-report Instruments for People With Intellectual Disability to Improve Cognitive Accessibility - Putting Guidelines to the Test
Study Overview
Status
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
L
-
Sittard, L, Netherlands, 6130 PC
- Koraal
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Last known Total Intelligence Quotient (TIQ) 55 - 85
- Receiving support from a care organization for persons with ID.
- A care worker who knows the participant for at least a year and knows him well enough tot complete the informant version of the ABAS-3 is available.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Severe physical or sensory impairment limiting ability to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Persons with Mild Intellectual Disability (MID) or Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF) complete the ABAS-3 in assisted form on two occasions: the original version the first time and an adapted version after a few weeks.
|
A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning
A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning, adapted to the communication level of the participant
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scoring comprehension - T0
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
Degree to which the qualitative information provided by the participant aligns with the self-reported score on the original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) questionnaire.
Outcomes are 0, scores align, -1, scores are lower than answer would suggest, +1, score is higher than answer would suggest.
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Scoring comprehension - T1
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Degree to which the qualitative information provided by the participant aligns with the self-reported score on the original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) questionnaire.
Outcomes are 0, scores align, -1, scores are lower than answer would suggest, +1, score is higher than answer would suggest.
|
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Text comprehension - cognitive interviews T0
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
Level of verbal understanding of questions in the questionnaire - qualitative analysis of answers from cognitive interviews during assessment of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition).
Terms and concepts that were misinterpreted, participant utterings of confusion of statements of difficulty
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Text comprehension - cognitive interviews T1
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Level of verbal understanding of questions in the questionnaire - qualitative analysis of answers from cognitive interviews during assessment of an adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition).
Terms and concepts that were misinterpreted, participant utterings of confusion of statements of difficulty.
|
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Comprehension of instructions - cognitive interviews T0
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
Level of verbal understanding of the instructions in the questionnaire - original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition).
Number of elements that were correctly identiefied (out of possible 10).
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Comprehension of instructions - cognitive interviews T1
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Level of verbal understanding of the instructions in the questionnaire - adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition).
Number of elements that were correctly identiefied (out of possible 10).
|
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Overall difficulty score - T0
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
Likert scale rating of the overall difficulty of items of original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) by participants (from 1. very easy - 5. very difficult)
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Overall difficulty score - T1
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Likert scale rating of the overall difficulty of items of adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) by participants (from 1. very easy - 5. very difficult)
|
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported Adaptive Functioning - original ABAS-3 scores
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour.
Both self-report and informant report versions are available.
In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used.
Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain).
Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale.
Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning.
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Self-reported Adaptive Functioning - adapted ABAS-3 scores
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning. The second time participants complete the ABAS (approximately 8 weeks after baseline, T1), an adapted version is used, with language and design adapted to the comprehension level of participants according to the outcomes at baseline (T0). |
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Informant-reported Adaptive Functioning - adapted ABAS-3 scores
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning. For the informant-report an adapted version of the original is used; the adaptations for the self-report version are replicated for the informant version. |
Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
|
|
Self-reported Adaptive functioning - SCAF
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
The SCAF (Screener for Adaptive Functioning) is a screening questionnaire for adaptive functioning for individuals who may have MID or BIF.
The SCAF yields a total AF score (min 0 - max 24), with higher scores indicating better adaptive functioning.
|
At baseline (T0)
|
|
Informant-reported Adaptive Functioning - original ABAS-3 scores
Time Frame: At baseline (T0)
|
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning. For the informant-report an adapted version of the original is used; the adaptations for the self-report version are replicated for the informant version. |
At baseline (T0)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roel Kooijmans, MSc, Koraal
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kooijmans, R., Mercera, G., Langdon, P. E., & Moonen, X. (2022). The adaptation of self-report measures to the needs of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Koraal-ABAS-Kooijmans
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mild Intellectual Disability
-
Oasi Research Institute-IRCCSNot yet recruitingMild Intellectual DisabilityItaly
-
Oasi Research Institute-IRCCSNot yet recruiting
-
Oasi Research Institute-IRCCSNot yet recruitingMild Intellectual DisabilityItaly
-
Oasi Research Institute-IRCCSNot yet recruiting
-
GalenusRx, Inc.CP UnlimitedNot yet recruitingDevelopmental Disability | Intellectual Disability, Mild | Intellectual Disability, Mild to ModerateUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoKorea Health Industry Development Institute; DoBrain Inc.CompletedMild Intellectual Disability | Borderline Intellectual FunctioningUnited States
-
Temple UniversityUniversity of Florida; University of Minnesota; University of New HampshireNot yet recruitingDevelopmental Disability | Intellectual Disability, Mild to ModerateUnited States
-
Chinese University of Hong KongActive, not recruitingIntellectual Disability, MildHong Kong
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingMild Intellectual DisabilityPakistan
-
Aleksandra KiperRecruitingIntellectual Disability, MildPoland
Clinical Trials on Adaptive functioning self-report questionnaire
-
Oslo University HospitalNot yet recruitingCaesarean SectionNorway
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
University Hospital, GasthuisbergFund for Scientific Research, Flanders, BelgiumCompleted
-
Acibadem UniversityNot yet recruitingParkinson Disease, Symptom Severity, Functional Status, Quality of Life, Self-compassion, and Self-efficacy
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedHuman Papillomavirus InfectionFrance
-
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of SussexNot yet recruitingEmotional Instability | Borderline PersonalityUnited Kingdom
-
Hospital Clínico La FloridaCompleted
-
Centre Leon BerardUniversity of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes; Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie...Completed
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompleted
-
Haukeland University HospitalOslo University Hospital; Norwegian School of Sport SciencesCompletedDuchenne Muscular DystrophyNorway