Anti-fungal Strategies in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Patients

April 19, 2022 updated by: Dr. Nipun Verma, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Early Empirical Versus Pre-emptive Systemic Anti-fungal Therapy in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Patients With Suspected Invasive Fungal Infections: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Early treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) may prevent undue mortality in acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients. We aim to study the impact of early empiric treatment (based on clinical suspicion) of IFI as compared to pre-emptive treatment (based on biomarkers and culture positivity) on the outcomes in ACLF patients with suspected IFI in a randomized trial. The ACLF patients with clinically suspected IFI would be randomly allocated to empiric treatment or pre-emptive treatment group and followed up clinically to assess the impact on survival, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness and safety of such an approach. The protocol is designed to cut- down unnecessary usage and to curtail the duration of antifungals use in ICUs based on biomarkers/culture-driven stoppage rules. The results will fuel further studies on formal cost-effective analysis and antimicrobial stewardship protocols in ACLF patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research question: Does an early empiric antifungal therapy improve 28-day overall survival as compared to pre-emptive antifungal therapy in critically ill, non-neutropenic adult ACLF patients with suspected IFI?

This study will be a single-center prospective randomized open-label with blinded end-point PROBE assessment and conducted at Liver ICU.

ACLF patients aged 18 to 75 years with all three criteria will be included

  1. ICU stay of 48 hours or recent hospitalization
  2. Two or more risk factors for IFI 3. Clinical suspicion of IFI

Exclusion criteria A Neutrophil count of less than 500 per mm3 B Recent antifungal treatment in the past 1months C Hepatocellular carcinoma or other active malignancy D Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to Liposomal AmB E HIV positivity or on HAART F Pregnancy or lactation G Moribund patients

Eligible patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio to receive either early empiric systemic antifungal therapy (SAT: based on risk factors and clinical suspicion) or Pre-emptive SAT (based on risk factors, clinical suspicion and radiological/investigation based evidence of fungal infection) in addition to standard medical therapy SMT and followed up for a period of 28-days or transplant or death

Empirical therapy will be Liposomal AmB 3 to 5 mg per kg of body weight per day.

It is preferred because of maximum efficacy, widest spectrum, and safety in liver disease

Pre-emptive therapy with liposomal AmB will be given if the treatment initiation rules are met including fungal biomarkers positivity, Mycological or radiological evidence of IFI

Proven-IFI will be treated as per IDSA or ESCMID guidelines in either group Stoppage rules in both groups will be based on fungal biomarkers and cultures that will be done twice weekly and twice negative bio-markers or fungal cultures at day7 and 10 will be essential to stop treatment

In case of intolerable adverse effects or contraindications to LipoAmB, the patients will undergo treatment as per IDSA guidelines Standard Medical Therapy will be as indicated and will include nutritional support, rifaximin lactulose albumin diuretics proton-pump inhibitors multivitamins and antibiotics

Outcomes will include survival at 28-day, clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness and safety of two approaches of antifungal therapy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

216

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • UT
      • Chandigarh, UT, India, 160012
        • Recruiting
        • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria (All three must be present):

  1. ICU stay >48 hours or admission in a tertiary care hospital prior to the current admission
  2. Two or more risk factors for IFI from amongst the following:-

    1. Mechanically ventilated at least ≥ 48 hours
    2. Treatment with broad-spectrum antibacterial agents for more than 3 days
    3. Arterial or central vein catheter ≥ 2days
    4. Diabetes Mellitus
    5. Total parenteral nutrition ≥ 48 hours
    6. Acute renal failure requiring any form of renal replacement therapy ≥48hours
    7. Pancreatitis related hospitalization > 7days in last 3 months
    8. Steroid use, immunosuppressant use in the preceding 30 days
    9. High disease score as defined as MELD≥20 or APACHE II ≥16
    10. Refractory ascites, norfloxacin prophylaxis
    11. Gastrointestinal tract surgery, abdominal perforation or anastomotic leaks or any invasive procedures or surgeries in the last 7days
    12. Chronic pulmonary diseases including COPD or Tuberculosis
    13. Moderate to severe sarcopenia as defined by The Royal Free Hospital-global assessment (RFH-GA) scale60 (As per Appendix "4" )
    14. Firm diagnosis of H1N1 influenza infection in the last 3 months
  3. Clinical suspicion of IFI as defined by any of the following:

    1. Evidence of unresolved sepsis/SIRS(≥ 2/4) despite appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics beyond 3days
    2. Recrudescence of fever after a period of defervescence of at least 48 hours while still on antibiotics and without other apparent cause
    3. Tracheobronchial ulcer, nodule, plaque or pseudo-membrane
    4. Sino-nasal infection: features of acute sinusitis with at least 1 of acute localized pain, nasal ulcer, eschar, orbital involvement or
    5. Respiratory symptoms:

      • Worsening respiratory insufficiency despite appropriate ventilator support and antibiotics
      • Any 2 of Pleuritic chest pain, pleural rub, dyspnea, hemoptysis
    6. Characteristic skin lesions suspected of fungal infection
    7. Unexplained worsening of encephalopathy after initial improvement

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neutrophil count of less than 500/mm3
  2. Current or recent antifungal treatment in the past 1 months
  3. Hepatocellular carcinoma or other active malignancy
  4. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to Liposomal AmB or any other AmB preparation
  5. Human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity on rapid card test/ELISA, or currently on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)
  6. Pregnancy as confirmed by urine pregnancy test or lactation
  7. Moribund patients as defined as

    1. ≥ 4 organ failure as per CLIF-SOFA score
    2. Signs of brainstem death- absent brainstem reflexes
    3. Expected ICU stay <48 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Early Empiric group
Participants will receive standard medical therapy along with the empiric strategy of treatment of invasive fungal infection (based on both risk factors and clinical suspicion of invasive fungal infection). The choice of drug will be as per institutional protocol i.e. Injection Liposomal Amphotericin B, 3-5 mg/kg of body weight as a 4- hour infusion in 5% dextrose solution. The infusion will be prepared ten minutes prior to administration by reconstituting the vial in dextrose solution by a Registered Nurse. Each vial contains 50 mg (50000U) encapsulated in liposomes. After reconstitution, the concentrate will contain 4mg/ml of the drug. During the first dose administration, 1mg will be administered with a micro drip set over ten minutes and then stopped to look for any reactions for 30 minutes. If there are no reactions, the rest of the drug is administered over 30-60 minutes period.

Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio after meeting eligibility criteria to either early empiric or pre-emptive strategy of treatment with antifungals. The antifungal treatment initiation will be at the time of allocation in the empiric group. The treatment initiation rules in the pre-emptive group will include

  1. Fungal Biomarkers positivity (Beta-D Glucan>150 pg/ml, Galactomannan index>1.0)
  2. Mycological evidence of fungal infection on fungal cultures from a non-sterile site
  3. Radiological evidence of fungal infection
  4. Other Investigations suggestive of fungal infection viz. endophthalmitis, vegetations suspicious of fungal infection, Vegetations on echocardiography with negative blood cultures for bacteria that is non-responsive to appropriate antibiotics, refractory culture-negative spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Treatment duration will be guided by serum biomarkers (BDG and GM) and fungal cultures.

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pre-emptive group
Participants will receive standard medical therapy along with the pre-emptive strategy of treatment of invasive fungal infection (based on risk factors, clinical suspicion and radiological or mycological evidence of invasive fungal infection). The choice of drug will be as per institutional protocol i.e. Injection Liposomal Amphotericin B, 3-5 mg/kg of body weight as a 4- hour infusion in 5% dextrose solution. The infusion will be prepared ten minutes prior to administration by reconstituting the vial in dextrose solution by a Registered Nurse. Each vial contains 50 mg (50000U) encapsulated in liposomes. After reconstitution, the concentrate will contain 4mg/ml of the drug. During the first dose administration, 1mg will be administered with a micro drip set over ten minutes and then stopped to look for any reactions for 30 minutes. If there are no reactions, the rest of the drug is administered over 30-60 minutes period.

Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio after meeting eligibility criteria to either early empiric or pre-emptive strategy of treatment with antifungals. The antifungal treatment initiation will be at the time of allocation in the empiric group. The treatment initiation rules in the pre-emptive group will include

  1. Fungal Biomarkers positivity (Beta-D Glucan>150 pg/ml, Galactomannan index>1.0)
  2. Mycological evidence of fungal infection on fungal cultures from a non-sterile site
  3. Radiological evidence of fungal infection
  4. Other Investigations suggestive of fungal infection viz. endophthalmitis, vegetations suspicious of fungal infection, Vegetations on echocardiography with negative blood cultures for bacteria that is non-responsive to appropriate antibiotics, refractory culture-negative spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Treatment duration will be guided by serum biomarkers (BDG and GM) and fungal cultures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 28 day
28-day overall survival
28 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of proven or probable IFI
Time Frame: 28 day
Incidence of proven or probable IFI at 28 days
28 day
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 28 day
Number of participants dying in hospital due to any cause within 28 day of enrollment
28 day
Evolution of organ failures as assessed by chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure score (CLIF-SOFA)
Time Frame: 28 day
Development of new or worsening organ failures as defined by chronic liver failure -sequential organ failure (CLIF-SOFA) scores within 28 days of enrollment. CLIF-SOFA score ranges from 0-24 incorporating 6 organ systems and 0 being best and 24 being worst.
28 day
Evolution of serum 1, 3 Beta-D Glucan (BDG; in pg/ml) levels throughout the study period
Time Frame: 28 day
Trends of 1, 3 Beta-D Glucan (BDG) throughout the study period that will be done on twice weekly intervals after enrollment
28 day
Evolution of serum Galactomannan index (GM; in %) throughout the study period
Time Frame: 28 day
Trends of Galactomannan index (GM; in %) throughout the study period that will be done on twice weekly intervals after enrollment
28 day
Incidence of key events like new onset ventilator associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection, spontaneous fungal peritonitis
Time Frame: 28 day
Incidence of key events like new onset VAP, UTI, fungal SBP
28 day
Mechanical ventilation free days
Time Frame: 28 day
Duration free from mechanical ventilation within 28 days of enrollment
28 day
Length of ICU and hospital stay
Time Frame: 28 day
Effect on length of ICU, hospital stay within 28 day of enrollment
28 day
Treatment success rate
Time Frame: 28 day

Treatment success rate, successful treatment being defined as

  1. Survival beyond 7 days of start of SAT with resolution of sepsis attributable to IFI
  2. Absence of new/ breakthrough IFI during treatment or within 7 days of completion
  3. Absence of treatment discontinuation related to toxicity/lack of efficacy
28 day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events due to antifungals requiring cessation of therapy
Time Frame: 28 day
Number of participants out of whole group who would develop adverse events due to antifungals that will require cessation of therapy within 28 day of enrollment
28 day
Out of pocket expenditure
Time Frame: 28 day
Out of pocket expenditure incurred by the patients in two groups
28 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nipun Verma, MD, DM, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

Clinical Trials on Treatment strategy trial

3
Subscribe