The Danish Neuropsychological Study of the Adverse Effects of ECT (DANSECT)

February 22, 2023 updated by: Poul Videbech, University of Copenhagen
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the adverse cognitive side-effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The second aim is to investigate the mechanisms of effect of ECT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ECT has been the most effective treatment of depression for decades. Despite of this, neither the mechanism of action or side-effects are fully elucidated. The reason why some patients relapse shortly after remission is still not completely understood. Thus, there is a need to find predictors of the favourable clinical effect, relapse and side-effects. ECT is considered by professionals to be a safe procedure. Additionally, many patients do not consent to this treatment because they fear a permanent loss of memory or that they will contract a brain damage after the completed ECT series. Therefore, it is very important to examine whether ECT might have negative effects on the structure or function of the brain, using state of the art Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques.

DANSECT is a prospective, observational follow-up study with the aim of examining why cognitive side-effects of ECT occur and potentially find predictors for whom they may affect by investigating the ECT-associated cognitive disturbances, structural brain changes and clinical outcomes. Second, DANSECT examines the mechanisms of effect of ECT.

DANSECT comprises an ECT-group (30 patients) and a clinical control group (30 patients). The former consists of patients with depression receiving ECT, and the latter consists of matched patients with depression treated pharmacologically. The examinations will take place at three time-points; before, immediately after ECT or just before discharge, and 6 months after. DANSECT is a naturalistic clinical project. This means that the number of ECT sessions given to the patients in the ECT-group is up to the referring physician.

The aim of DANSECT is to investigate the cognitive side-effects of ECT. Specifically, the research project aims to examine:

  1. Prevalence, extent and persistence of adverse cognitive effects following ECT.
  2. Associations between neuroimaging findings and cognitive changes following ECT.
  3. Predictors of adverse cognitive effects of ECT.

Hypotheses:

  1. Consistency in autobiographical memories will be reduced over time in both study groups. However, the reduction will be significantly larger for the ECT patients after ECT compared to the control group. The group difference is expected to be present at both short-term and long-term.
  2. Autobiographical memory deterioration is expected to correlate with volumetric changes of the hippocampi.
  3. Processing speed, anterograde memory and executive functions will be temporarily deteriorated after ECT. The cognitive changes will correlate with volumetric brain changes and changes in structural connectivity.
  4. Baseline atrophy, age, years of education and cognitive reserve will predict the cognitive side-effects following ECT.
  5. Machine learning will reveal patterns and inference enabling the development of a predictive model of clinical and cognitive outcome after treatment with ECT, by combining neuropsychological tests, structural and functional neuroimaging (MRI) and other neurobiological measures.

In addition, the aim of DANSECT is to investigate the mechanisms of effect of ECT. The secondary aims of the project are thus to examine:

  1. Clinical, biochemical and neurobiological predictors of response to ECT
  2. Clinical, biochemical and neurobiological predictors of relapse of depression after ECT
  3. Biochemical and neurobiological mechanisms of response to ECT

Hypotheses:

  1. Smaller baseline hippocampal volume is associated with a larger post-pre reduction of depressive symptoms
  2. Thinner cortical thickness predicts better clinical improvement
  3. The cortisol trajectory before ECT is associated with clinical outcome
  4. Elevated peripheral baseline VEGF is associated with a larger post-pre reduction of depressive symptoms
  5. Baseline microRNA levels are associated with clinical outcome
  6. A higher baseline structural connectivity predicts better clinical improvement
  7. A larger post-ECT increase in hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, BDNF and VEGF predicts a lower risk of relapse within six months after an ECT series

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Recruiting
        • Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark
        • Contact:
          • Poul Videbech, Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christoffer Cramer Lundsgaard, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of two groups of inpatients admitted to one of the recruiting Mental Health Centres (MHC) in the Capital Region of Denmark, diagnosed with depression according to the 10th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and scheduled to ECT series. Patients in the other group does not received ECT and is thus a control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-95 years
  • admitted at the MHC Glostrup, MHC Amager or MHC Copenhagen (or other Mental Health Centres in the Capital Region)
  • fulfilling the criteria for depression according to ICD-10 and where ECT is planned.
  • must be able to give informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder except for psychotic depression
  • Dependency syndrome according to ICD-10.
  • Severe somatic or neurological condition (e.g. stroke) confounding results
  • Head trauma resulting in unconsciousness for more than 5 minutes
  • Severe psychotic symptoms or suicide impulses making transportation hazardous
  • Contraindications against MRI
  • Pregnancy
  • Maintenance ECT or ECT received during the last 6 months
  • Any form of compulsory treatment
  • Subjects who do not consent to be informed of incidental findings that could have healthcare implications will not be scanned and can thus not be included

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ECT
Group of patients receiving ECT during their hospitalization.

Electroconvulsive therapy is a procedure, done under general anesthesia, in which small electric currents are passed through the brain, intentionally triggering a brief seizure.

Repeated as deemed needed by the patients' doctor. Typically prescribed 10 times (3 times pr week)

Non-ECT
Group of patients not receiving ECT during their hospitalization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview - Short Form
Time Frame: at baseline (before ECT series)
Measures consistency in autobiographical memories over time. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 60. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at baseline (before ECT series)
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview - Short Form
Time Frame: at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series
Measures consistency in autobiographical memories over time. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 60. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview - Short Form
Time Frame: at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series
Measures consistency in autobiographical memories over time. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 60. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6-item. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 22. A higher score means more symptom severity.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
The Screen for Cognitive Impairment for Psychiatry
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Screening tool to measure cognitive performance across several cognitive domains. Scoring: Minimum 0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Reys complex figure task
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures visuospatial, constructional, executive and anterograde memory abilities. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 36. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Trail Making Test A
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures psychomotor speed. Scoring: Minimum:0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a worse cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Trail Making Test B
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures complex psychomotor speed / executive function. Scoring: Minimum:0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a worse cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Digit span (WAIS-IV)
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures attention span (forwards) and working memory (backwards). Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 16.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Five Point Test
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures spatial fluency / problem solving. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a better cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Color-Word Interference Test (D-KEFS)
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures psychomotor speed, meantal flexibility and set-shifting. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a worse cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Symbol Digit Modalities Test
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures psychomotor speed. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score means a worse cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire - Danish version
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Measures subjective experience of the vividness of ones mental visual imagery. Scoring: Minimum: 16. Maximum: 80. A higher score means more vividly experienced mental imagery.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Vocabulary (WAIS-IV)
Time Frame: at one time point: at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series
Measures vocabulary and serves as an estimate of premorbid intellectual ability. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 57. A higher score means a better vocabulary.
at one time point: at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series
Cognitive complaints in bipolar disorder rating assessment
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Self-report of experienced cognitive difficulties. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 48. A higher score means more symptom severity.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Self-report of experienced memory difficulties. Scoring: Minimum: -72. Maximum: +72. A higher score means a better cognitive function.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Paired Associates Learning (CANTAB)
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Visuospatial pattern localization. Scoring: Minimum 0. Maximum: Unlimited. A higher score (errors) means a worse cognitive performance.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
WHO-5
Time Frame: at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)
Self-report of well-being in the last 14 days. Scoring: Minimum: 0. Maximum: 25. A higher score means a better experience of well-being.
at 3 time points: at baseline (before ECT series), at 5 (+/- 2) days after completion of the ECT series, at follow-up (6 (+/-2) months after the ECT series)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Poul Videbech, Professor, University of Copenhagen & Mental Health Centre Glostrup

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share Individual Patient Data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Electroconvulsive therapy

3
Subscribe