- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04163744
Effectiveness and Safety of Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Catheter (INDOBA) (INDOBA)
The goal of induction of labor is to achieve vaginal delivery by stimulating uterine contractions before the spontaneous onset of labor. Generally, induction of labor has merit as a therapeutic option when the benefits of expeditious delivery outweigh the risks of continuing the pregnancy.
The first part of this process is called cervical ripening. The goal is to facilitate the process of cervical softening, thinning, and dilating with resultant reduction in the rate of failed induction and induction to delivery time. Cervical remodeling is a critical component of normal parturition.
Effective methods for cervical ripening include the use of mechanical and pharmacological methods.
There are many induction methods: pharmacological and mechanical.
Nowadays, induction of labour is one of the most frequent obstetric interventions, performed in 25% of pregnancies. Generally, better maternal and neonatal outcomes are achieved if the risks of continuing pregnancy outweigh the benefits.
Cervical ripening is the first part of the induction process, which consists in relaxing and softening the uterine cervix prior to the onset of uterine dynamics.
For this purpose, there are available pharmacological (mainly prostaglandin) and mechanical methods (including the balloon probes: Foley catheter or double cervical balloon). Despite being equally effective in vaginal delivery and caesarean section rate, there has been registered an increased risk of uterine hyperdynamic with the use of prostaglandin in contrast to the use of balloon probes, which may lead to an increased risk of fetal distress.
Concerning balloon probes, various published studies conclude that it is an effective and safe cervical ripening method, without increasing the risk of maternal infection (chorioamnionitis / endometritis) or neonatal infection.
The use of balloon probes could be established as first-choice method of induction of labour, reducing the risk of uterine hyperdynamic and the likelihood of intrauterine fetal distress derived from the use of prostaglandin.
The balloon probe safety makes it an ideal method for performing cervical ripening at home (out-patient) in low-risk pregnancies, increasing the satisfaction of women who desire it and reducing the economic cost for the hospital.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of double balloon catheter (CRB-Cook®) in induction of labour.
The main objective is to provide evidence that there are no differences in caesarean section rate between induction of labour performed with Cook double balloon catheter in out-patient and in-patient compared with a cohort of induction of labour with pharmacological methods (dinoprostone and misoprostol).
Two clinical studies will be carried out for this purpose:
- Prospective cohort observational study
- Historical case-control study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08025
- Recruiting
- Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women
- Age: ≧ 18 years
- Ability to read and understand informed consent
- Unique or multiple pregnancies (monochorionic or dichorionic twins)
- ≧37 weeks of pregnancy
- Unfavourable cervix (Bishop test: < 7)
Exclusion Criteria:
- >2 foetus pregnancies
- < 37 or ≧42 weeks of pregnancy
- Prelabour rupture of membranes
Vaginal delivery contraindication
- Placenta previa (occlusive and not occlusive)
- Vasa previa
- Transverse or oblique lie
- Umbilical cord procubitus or prolapse
- Corporal uterine surgery with entrance into the uterine cavity
- Antecedent of ≧ 2 caesarean section
- Antecedent of inverted T caesarean section
- Antecedent of uterine rupture
- Active genital herpes infection
- Cervical carcinoma
- Severe maternal pathology
- Breech lie
- ≥ 7 Bishop score
- Non-reassuring fetal cardiotocographic registration
- Indication of immediate delivery
- Stillbirth of malformed foetus
Also, patients to be included in the out-patient group should comply with the following criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
- Low-risk pregnancies
- ≤ 2 previous deliveries
- Patient acceptation and good comprehension of the instructions
- Maximum 30 minutes of distance to the hospital.
- Possibility of telephone communication at any moment
- To be accompanied by someone during the entire process at home
Exclusion criteria:
- Positive screening for vaginal / rectum group B streptococcal infection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness Vaginal delivery / caesarean section rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measure vaginal delivery and caesarean rate of induction of labour with double balloon catheter
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of patient and foetus
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measured through complications and adverse effects registered during induction of labour
|
12 months
|
|
Patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measured as global satisfaction with the use of double balloon catheter as induction of labour method with an analog visual scale from 0 to 10
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elisa Llurba, MD, PhD, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- WHO recommendations: Induction of labour at or beyond term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535795/
- Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
- Ten Eikelder ML, Mast K, van der Velden A, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BW. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):620-630. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000361.
- Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
- Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):418-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.
- McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIBSP-CRB-2019-70
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Induction of Labour
-
Ministry of Health, BhutanNot yet recruitingInduction of LabourBhutan
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalNational Healthcare Group, SingaporeCompletedInduction of LabourSingapore
-
Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training...Completed
-
Ferring PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaNot yet recruitingInduction of LabourSlovenia
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreCompletedInduction of LabourMalaysia
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, PakistanRecruitingInduction of Labour With MisoprostolPakistan
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbHCompletedLabour Induction
Clinical Trials on Double balloon catheter
-
Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterUnknownPregnancy | Previous Cesarian Section | Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM)
-
University Hospital TuebingenUnknown
-
Centre Hospitalier de PAUNot yet recruitingInduction of ChildbirthFrance
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
Jena University HospitalCompleted
-
Western Galilee Hospital-NahariyaCompletedCesarean | Endometritis | Induction of LaborIsrael
-
Haukeland University HospitalCompletedInduction of BirthNorway
-
Soroka University Medical CenterUnknownPrelabor Rupture of Membranes | Previous; Cesarean Section, Cicatricial, Complicating Pregnancy or Childbirth, Affecting Fetus or NewbornIsrael
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalUnknown
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingDelivery ProblemHong Kong