Functional Collagen Scaffold for Laryngeal Soft Tissue Regeneration

November 14, 2019 updated by: Jianwu Dai, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Clinical Study of Functional Collagen Scaffold Transplantation for Laryngeal Soft Tissue Regeneration

Unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP) is a clinical condition and often leads to glottic insufficiency. The presence of glottic insufficiency can result in poor pronunciation quality, vocal fatigue, shortness of breath with speaking, and in some cases, it could lead to unable to pronounce, dysphagia and aspiration, severely decreasing quality of life for its victims. This study is carried out to explore the short-term and long-term efficacy of the functional collagen scaffold in guiding laryngeal soft tissue regeneration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100032
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age of 18-65 years old, male or female
  2. Unilateral vocal cord injury and poor closure of the glottis
  3. Disease course was more than 1 year
  4. At least two GRBAS scores reach 2 points or more
  5. The subjects have read and fully understood the research notes, signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Over speaking professionals, such as teachers, shop assistants
  2. With vital organ dysfunction, such as heart, lung, liver or kidney
  3. With malignant tumors
  4. Pregnant or lactating women, or in preconception period
  5. History of drug allergy
  6. Difficult to be followed-up or cooperate long-termly
  7. Participated in other clinical trials in the last 3 months
  8. With severe progressive diseases
  9. Alcoholics or drug addicts
  10. Unable to execute clinical study protocol due to severe mental disorders or lingual barriers
  11. With inevitable circumstances of voice damage
  12. Any other unsuitable conditions for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional collagen scaffold transplantation
Injectable collagen scaffold combined with autologous adipose-derived cells will be injected into submucosa of vocal cord and paraglottic space under the surgical microscope
Experimental: Autologous adipose cell transplantation
Autologous adipose-derived cells will be injected into the submucosa of vocal cord and paraglottic space under the surgical microscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 1 week after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
1 week after intervention
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 1 month after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
1 month after intervention
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 3 month after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
3 month after intervention
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 6 month after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
6 month after intervention
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 9 month after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
9 month after intervention
GRBAS scale
Time Frame: 12 month after intervention
Auditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance
12 month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Voice handicap index (VHI) scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is a 30-item test divided into 3 subscales that measure the functional, physical and emotional features of the disability caused by voice impairment was used for patient self-assessment. The subscale scores ranged from 0 to 40, and the total ranged from 0 to 120, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of disability
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Jitter
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Acoustic voice analysis parameter. Jitter is for short and middle term pitch perturbation analysis
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Shimmer
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Acoustic voice analysis parameter. Shimmer is for short and middle term amplitude perturbation analysis
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Normalized noise energy (NNE)
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Acoustic voice analysis parameter. Normalized Noise Energy (NNE) is automatically computed from the voice signals using an adaptive comb filtering method performed in the frequency domain
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Maximum phonation time (MPT)
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Acoustic voice analysis parameter. Maximum phonation time (MPT) represents the maximum time that an individual can sustain the vowel /a/ at a comfortable pitch and loudness
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after intervention
Physical status of vocal cords
Time Frame: 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 month after intervention
The morphology of vocal cords (thin or fat, smooth or rough, plump or atrophy), motor function of vocal cords (normal, limited or fixed) and glottic closure (yes or no) were observed by fiber laryngoscopy
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 month after intervention
Volume of vocal cords
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 year after intervention
The volume of vocal cords was evaluated by Computed tomography (CT)
Baseline, 1 year, 2 year after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CAS-XDA-LSTR/IGDB

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glottic Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Functional collagen scaffold transplantation

3
Subscribe