Early Institutionalization Intervention Impact Project (EI-3)

March 16, 2026 updated by: Charles Alexander Nelson III, Boston Children's Hospital
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of early intervention (placement into foster care, and a caregiving training) on physical, cognitive, social and brain development and psychiatric symptomatology in children place in out-of-home care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Early Institutionalization Intervention Impact (EI-3) Project will document and compare the impact of enhanced institutional care on early childhood development to that of high-quality foster care. We will recruit a large (n= 220) samples of young children who have been identified as having to be removed from their families and we will randomize these children to two groups: enhanced institutional care (Group 1) or to enhanced foster care (Group 2). Institutional caregivers and Foster Parents will participate in a caregiving training, along with the child, that includes 8-1.5 hour sessions over 8-9 weeks.

In this Randomized Control Trial (RCT), we will assess the children in Groups 1 and 2 at the time they come into care and then at several follow-up time points (12 months, 24 months, 36 months of age). We hypothesize that children placed into foster/family care (FCG) will display enhanced socioemotional development, and enhanced behavioral and neural patterns of attention, cognition and social cognition, compared to children placed in enhanced institutional care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 01228-200
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto PENSI
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edson Amaro, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • newly entering the institution system in and near São Paulo, Brazil, and the institution director or foster parent is the guardian at the time of baseline,
  • at the time of baseline assessment the child is less than 24 months old,
  • the child's birth weight must be at or above 2500 grams; none should be small or large for dates.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the child does not have a neurological or other genetic condition that severely impairs typical development (e.g. Cerebral Palsy, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Down Syndrome)
  • the child is below 2500 grams.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced Foster Care

Foster parents will be recruited, consented to background checks, and trained in Portuguese. Hired foster parents will supported and monitored by project social workers and psychologists from local Foster Care programs. Foster parents will received frequent visits from the social workers, with visits occurring weekly for several months after placement of the child, then biweekly and later monthly. Project social workers will consult weekly with US staff experienced in dealing with young children in foster care.

Additionally, foster parents will participate in the VIPP caregiving training, in the same format as that described in the Enhanced Institutional Care Arm: the VIPP Interventionist will meet with caregivers and children for 5, 2-hours sessions over 6-8 weeks to discuss recordings of children and their caregivers. As described above, the sessions will focus on creating a positive atmosphere by reinforcing positive interactions.

During AVI an intervenor meets with a caregiver (foster parent or caregiver at the institution) and child in the home environment. During each session, the intervenor videotapes the caregiver and child doing play-based activities. During that meeting, the intervenor reviews the videos with the caregiver and provides positive, constructive feedback to the caregiver. AVI is aimed at increasing sensitivity in parents/caregivers in order to encourage positive interactions. The guiding principles are to create a positive environment and to convey that the caregiver is the expert on their own child. The AVI methodology was selected to be used as a method of caregiving intervention with the study participants due to its demonstrated results in its use with children in contexts of social vulnerability, as well as families included in the child protection system. This will be the first time that AVI is being used in foster and institutional care in Brazil.
Other Names:
  • Attachment Video Feedback intervention

Upon entry into the Child Protection System, if the child is assigned to one of the districts participating in the RCT, the court will notify the study team. Children that have been randomly assigned to Foster Care will be placed in a foster home within 48 hours of referral to the Family Court/Child Protection System.

Children and Foster Parents will receive biweekly visits from Social Workers. Children and Foster parents will also participate in the caregiving intervention described below. Children will remain in the placement until such time as the social workers, psychologists and Family Court Judge determine that one of the following outcomes is appropriate: reunification with biological family or adoption.

Experimental: Enhanced Institutional Care

Caregivers at institutions will participate in a caregiving training, called Attachment VideoFeedback Intervention (AVI). During AVI a trained interventionist meets with a caregiver and child in the home environment.

The AVI Interventionist will meet with caregivers and children for 8, 1.5-hours sessions over 8-9 weeks to discuss recordings of children and their caregivers. As described above, the sessions will focus on creating a positive atmosphere by reinforcing positive interactions.

During AVI an intervenor meets with a caregiver (foster parent or caregiver at the institution) and child in the home environment. During each session, the intervenor videotapes the caregiver and child doing play-based activities. During that meeting, the intervenor reviews the videos with the caregiver and provides positive, constructive feedback to the caregiver. AVI is aimed at increasing sensitivity in parents/caregivers in order to encourage positive interactions. The guiding principles are to create a positive environment and to convey that the caregiver is the expert on their own child. The AVI methodology was selected to be used as a method of caregiving intervention with the study participants due to its demonstrated results in its use with children in contexts of social vulnerability, as well as families included in the child protection system. This will be the first time that AVI is being used in foster and institutional care in Brazil.
Other Names:
  • Attachment Video Feedback intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in security of attachment
Time Frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Strange Situation Procedure
baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Differences in Alpha Electroencephalogram (EEG) Power, Coherence and Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
EEG power
baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in Cognition in early Childhood
Time Frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Mullen Scales of Early Learning, AGS Edition. For the subscales (Visual Receptions, Fine Motor, Gross Motor, Receptive, and Expressive Language), the minimum T-score is 20 and the maximum is 80. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The Composite Standard Score goes from 49 to 155; 155 is the best outcome.
baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Differences in Attachment Disturbances and Disorders
Time Frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Disturbances of Attachment Interview
baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Differences in Competence
Time Frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos
Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessments- Revised. Range for competence is 0-66. Ratings are 0, 1, 2 on 33 items. Higher scores are better outcomes. T-scores of 35 or lower on the Competence scale are also termed "of concern."
baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathan A Fox, PhD, University of Maryland
  • Principal Investigator: Charles A Nelson, PhD, BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL/ Harvard University
  • Principal Investigator: Charles H Zeanah, PhD, Tulane University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychopathology

Clinical Trials on Caregiving Intervention

Subscribe