Monocentric Feasibility Study for a New Medical Device for the Treatment of Anal Fissure With Botulinum Toxin

November 16, 2020 updated by: Dieter Hahnloser

Étude Monocentrique de faisabilité d'un Nouveau Dispositif Pour le Traitement de la Fissure Anale Par Toxine Botulique (FR) Monocentric Feasibility Study for a New Medical Device for the Treatment of Anal Fissure With Botulinum Toxin (EN)

Monocentric feasibility study for a new device for the treatment of anal fissure with botulinum toxin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anal fissure is a common anal disease. This is a longitudinal tear in the distal part of the anal canal. The fissure provokes a spasm of the internal anal sphincter and as such pain and eventually bleeding.

There are currently 3 different treatments. All available treatments tend to relax the anal sphincter, which reduces pain and promotes fissure healing.

The first treatment consists in the local application of cream into the anal canal.

The second option is the injection of botulinum toxin into the internal or external anal sphincter. Finally the third option is a surgical intervention, most frequently a lateral sphincterotomy.

Although the usefulness of botulinum toxin to treat anal fissure has been demonstrated, the results vary. This is most likely largely due to the fact that there is no standardized way to inject botulinum toxin and that there is a significant learning curve. In addition, the gesture is not without risk for the operator.

The objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of injecting botulinum toxin into the anal canal with a new medical device for patients with anal fissure.

The trial is a mono-centric pilot study conducted on 4 patients. The study is open, prospective and all patients will be treated with the botulinum toxin injected using the new medical device.

The device (single-use) under investigation and the botulinum toxin will be made available free of charge to the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Lausanne Universitary Hospital (CHUV)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients suffering from anal fissures for a minimum of 6 weeks.
  • informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to the use of botulinum toxin or any known allergies
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Immune deficiency, immunosuppression
  • Anticoagulant treatment
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Acute anal inflammation (eg.proctitis)
  • Internal hemorrhoids of grade 2 or higher
  • Anal fissure that did not respond to a previous treatment by botulinum toxin
  • History of lateral sphincterotomy
  • Cardiopulmonary disease leading to reduced function of the Cardiopulmonary system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Injection of botulinum toxin with investigational device
Injection of botulinum toxin into the anal sphincter with the investigational device (anuscope with needles).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the injection of the botulin toxin with the device under investigation
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).
The operator shall answer by yes or no. If yes, the procedure is further assessed (see outcome 2)
This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the procedure by the operator
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).

The operator will assess the procedure by answering the following questions:

How was the introduction of the anuscope ? easy-neither easy nor difficult-difficult.

How was the positioning of the anuscope? easy-neither easy nor difficult-difficult.

How was the deployment of the needles? easy-neither easy nor difficult-difficult.

How was the injection of the toxin? easy-neither easy nor difficult-difficult. How was the needles retraction? easy-neither easy nor difficult-difficult.

This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).
Assessment of the patient's tolerance: visual analogic scale (VAS)
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).
Patient assessment using a visual analogic scale (0 to 10, 0 not tolerated at all, 10 well tolerated)
This outcome will be assessed right after the use of the device under investigation, at day 1 (day of the intervention).
Assessment of the relaxation of the internal anal sphincter
Time Frame: day 1, day +7, day +56
Measurement of the relaxation using MAPLe
day 1, day +7, day +56
Assessment of the incontinence
Time Frame: day 1, day +7, day +56
Score of Vaizey (0 minimum score, perfect continence; 24 = maximum score, totally incontinent)
day 1, day +7, day +56
Assessment of the healing rate
Time Frame: day 1, day +56
Assessment according to the Lindsey criteria
day 1, day +56
Safety of the procedure by assessing adverse events, device deficiencies and identifying new risks
Time Frame: day 1, day +7, day +56
Safety of the procedure by assessing adverse events (description of adverse events, number of participants), device deficiencies (description of the deficiency) and identifying new risks
day 1, day +7, day +56

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dieter Hahnloser, Prof., Lausanne Universitaire Hospital (CHUV)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DIT_Anuscope_2019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anal Fissure

Clinical Trials on Anuscope with needles

3
Subscribe