Sublingual Sufentanil vs Intravenous Fentanyl for Acute Pain in the Ambulatory Surgery Center

April 15, 2021 updated by: University of Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to determine if a single dose of sublingual sufentanil is as or more efficacious than a single dose of IV fentanyl in a post anesthesia care setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a level I randomized prospective outcomes study comparing two groups of patients. Upon arrival in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) if the patient has a pain score of 4 or greater they will then be randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 will receive 50 mcg of IV fentanyl and group 2 will receive 30 mcg of sublingual sufentanil. The primary outcome assessed will be time of readiness to discharge after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing outpatient ambulatory surgery
  • recipient of general anesthesia
  • pain score of 4 or greater in the PACU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-english speaking patients
  • cancer surgeries
  • patients who have allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or derivatives
  • patients on chronic opioids (defined as daily opioids for 3 months or longer)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sublingual Sufentanil
Single dose of sublingual sufentanil for acute pain.
30 mcg of sublingual sufentanil
Active Comparator: IV Fentanyl
single dose of IV fentanyl for acute pain.
50 mcg of IV fentanyl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery Room Time
Time Frame: 1 day
The time (reported in minutes) from when the patient arrives in the PACU, right after surgery, to the time that all discharge criteria are met.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rescue Milligram Morphine Equivalents (Opioid Use After Intervention Until Discharge)
Time Frame: 1 day
All doses of opioid medications administered following initial dosage (sufentanil or fentanyl depending on study arm) will be converted to milligram morphine equivalents and summed for reporting.
1 day
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 day
Number of serious adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5) experienced by each group
1 day
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: 1 day
Number of participants in each arm who are treated for nausea and/or vomiting.
1 day
Supplemental Oxygen
Time Frame: 1 day
Number of participants in each arm who require supplemental oxygen therapy
1 day
Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) is a 7-item multi-dimensional survey that assesses analgesia benefits. Items are scored on a scale from 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). Total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron M Berg, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Sublingual Sufentanil

Subscribe