High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients Undergoing ERCP Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Intravenous Sedation.

December 15, 2025 updated by: Christian Rouphael, American University of Beirut Medical Center

High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Intravenous Sedation.

The aim of the current study is to compare the incidence of oxygen desaturation in patients receiving HFNC at different flow rates compared to conventional oxygen therapy via a simple cannula during ERCP. Secondary outcomes include lowest average observed oxygen saturation (SpO2), snoring classification scores and satisfaction levels of both patients and gastroenterologists.

Participants will be randomized to 3 groups: G0 will receive a 5 l/ min flow rate through a nasal cannula at and FiO2 of 40 %, G1 will receive a 15 l/ min flow rate and FiO2 of 40% and G2: will receive a 60L/min flow rate and FiO2 of 40%.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

High flow nasal cannula provides adequate oxygenation in patients with compromised pulmonary function. Very few studies in the literature addressed its use with IV sedation in the OR. Successful application of High Flow nasal cannula in intravenous deep sedation cases in the OR will benefit in the reduction of airway manipulation and side effects from general anesthesia.

The aim of the current study is to compare the incidence of oxygen desaturation in patients receiving HFNC at different flow rates compared to conventional oxygen therapy via a simple cannula during ERCP. Secondary outcomes include lowest average observed oxygen saturation (SpO2), snoring classification scores and satisfaction levels of both patients and gastroenterologists.

A total of 60 patients undergoing ERCP will be equally randomized to 3 groups:

G0: will receive a 5 l/ min flow rate through a nasal cannula at and FiO2 of 40 %, G1: will receive a 15 l/ min flow rate and FiO2 of 40% and G2: will receive a 60L/min flow rate and FiO2 of 40%.

The three groups' intra-procedure and outcome parameters and variables will be compared. Statistical comparison will be made using the ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Chi-squared test. Level of statistical significance will be considered at p<0.05. ANOVA test will be performed to compare the different means between the four groups. Minimum and maximum 3 of 17 values will be recorded for each value in all 3 groups. A two sided P value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Christian Rouphael

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient able to give consent.
  2. Patient undergoing deep sedation.
  3. Patient undergoing ERCP procedure with no restrictions on the duration of the procedure.
  4. Age > 18 years
  5. Patients with BMI < 40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient unable to give consent
  2. Patient refusal to participate
  3. Patients undergoing general anesthesia
  4. age less than 18 years old
  5. Patients with severe heart failure (EF<30%)
  6. Morbidly obese Patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2
  7. Patients with sleep apnea
  8. Claustrophobia
  9. Risk of aspiration due to severe reflux
  10. Facial injury, facial malformation
  11. Nasal defects/obstruction
  12. ASA 4 patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control group
High flow rate of 5 L/min and FiO2 of 40%
nasal cannula at a flow rate of 15 l/min and FiO2 of 40%
Experimental: Group 15 liter
Nasal cannula at flow rate of 15 L/min and FiO2 of 40%
nasal cannula at a flow rate of 30l/min and FiO2 of 40%
Experimental: Group 60 liter
Nasal cannula at flow rate of 60 L/min and FiO2 of 40%
nasal cannula at flow rate of 60L/min. Oxygen supplementation will be at an FiO2 of 40%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Desaturation
Time Frame: During the surgery
Desaturation (SpO2≤95%) or a drop of more than 5% from baseline SpO2
During the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lowest SpO2
Time Frame: During procedure
Lowest SpO2 (%)
During procedure
Mean SpO2
Time Frame: During procedure
Mean SpO2 (%)
During procedure
Duration of the procedure
Time Frame: During procedure
Duration of the procedure measured in minutes
During procedure
Snoring status
Time Frame: During procedure
Snoring status measured as Yes/No
During procedure
Snoring snore
Time Frame: During procedure
snoring score assessed using a subjective snoring classification developed at Stanford on a scale from 0 to 10
During procedure
Gastroenterologists' satisfaction
Time Frame: During procedure
Gastroenterologists' satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale
During procedure
Patients' satisfaction
Time Frame: During procedure
Patients' satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale
During procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Rouphael, MD, American University of Beirut Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ANES.CE.01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High-flow Nasal Cannula

Clinical Trials on High flow nasal cannula (15 L/m)

Subscribe